Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Questions about the reckless U.S. rescue attempt in Yemen [View all]former9thward
(33,424 posts)19. I don't agree with the OP but al Qaeda has released many hostages.
Mainly to the European countries. They pay.
In stark contrast to the US and UK, Continental nations, including Germany, France, Italy, and Spain, have directly paid ransoms to hostage-takers. The nations are in turn accused of funding terrorism, with al-Qa'ida alone making $125 million (£75 million) from global ransom transactions since 2008 - $66m (£40m) of which was made last year, the New York Times reported. It is believed that North African al-Qa'ida agents have benefited most from this indirect European funding.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/isis-hostage-threat-which-countries-pay-ransoms-to-release-their-citizens-9710129.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
49 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
How could they have known that the terrorists might have high-tech equipment like barking guard dogs
HomerRamone
Dec 2014
#4
I find it amazing that anyone would believe AlQaeda's claims that they were going to release
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#8
I think it was, too. And I cannot imagine the suffering the hostage's families
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#22
They couldn't wait because they had reliable intel that the hostage would be killed Saturday morning
okaawhatever
Dec 2014
#13
The South African hostage is dead. He probably would have been free by now.
Comrade Grumpy
Dec 2014
#5
You are assuming a great deal here.....mainly that AQAP are truthtellers. That is an astonishing
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#9
Even if they didn't "know" for sure why not wait a day rather than do something so chancy? nt
HomerRamone
Dec 2014
#10
Posting a comment on an anonymous message board is not questioning authority. n/t
1StrongBlackMan
Dec 2014
#33
Again....why are accepting that AQAP's narrative of events is the truthful one?
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#14
Yes....they believed what AQAP told them. After 18 months of captivity, he was being released.
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#46
They'd been negotiating for 18 months. AQAP took the ransom money, and shot him anyway.nt
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#49
Clearly your source of information on this subject is promoting an agenda. Most reliable media
okaawhatever
Dec 2014
#15
He's not dead because of the rescue attempt, he's dead because AQAP shot him.
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#26
Actually, I find that your source does excuse terrorists. Your source seems to accept the
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#35
Yet they didn't shoot him for 18 months. He died because of the rescue attempt.
Comrade Grumpy
Dec 2014
#38
No....he died because AQAP kidnapped him and then killed him. If you served on
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#39
I think AQAP is directly culpable. I think the US is indirectly culpable. That's not so hard, is it?
Comrade Grumpy
Dec 2014
#43
Um...AQAP already had the ransom money. They shot him, anyway. So, tell me again
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#48
This blog is nothing but propaganda and conspiracy theory. You should be ashamed you posted it here
okaawhatever
Dec 2014
#18
And yet you didn't use the Guardian article for your post did you? No, you used a no-source CT
okaawhatever
Dec 2014
#45
But then, you're not the hostage who was about to be freed who got killed instead.
Comrade Grumpy
Dec 2014
#40