Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
Mon Dec 8, 2014, 05:22 PM Dec 2014

Americans Want Congress Members To Pee In Cups To Prove They're Not On Drugs [View all]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/02/drug-testing-congress_n_4373472.html

While most Americans like the idea of drug testing for welfare recipients, they LOVE the idea of drug testing for members of Congress.

According to a new HuffPost/YouGov poll, 64 percent of Americans favor requiring welfare recipients to submit to random drug testing -- a measure pushed by Republican lawmakers in recent years -- while 18 percent oppose it. But an even stronger majority said they're in favor of random drug testing for members of Congress, by a 78 percent to 7 percent margin. Sixty-two percent said they "strongly" favor drug testing for congressional lawmakers, compared to only 51 percent who said the same of welfare recipients.

The House of Representatives passed legislation this year that would allow states to require food stamp recipients to pee in cups to prove they're not on drugs. In 2012, Republicans pushed for drug testing of people seeking unemployment insurance benefits when they lose their jobs. At the state level, GOP lawmakers across the country have sought drug testing for an array of safety net programs. (Politicians sometimes refer to means-tested government benefits in general as "welfare," although the term is more commonly a nickname for the relatively small Temporary Assistance for Needy Families program.)...

If a member of Congress is caught using illegal drugs, as Rep. Trey Radel (R-Fla.) was in late October, Americans expressed little inclination to show mercy. Sixty-six percent said that a member of Congress convicted of possessing a small amount of cocaine should be forced to resign, while only 14 percent favored allowing the convicted member to serve out the remainder of his or her term.
44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I just want ignition interlocks sharp_stick Dec 2014 #1
Not Boner, that's for sure KamaAina Dec 2014 #2
Very true sharp_stick Dec 2014 #4
Johnny Walker Orange. nt msanthrope Dec 2014 #5
:D C Moon Dec 2014 #19
A whole new brand sharp_stick Dec 2014 #31
there would be a designated blow flunky on the payroll. Voice for Peace Dec 2014 #14
I'm telling you sharp_stick Dec 2014 #32
no convincing needed here. Voice for Peace Dec 2014 #34
It's sad isn't it? n/t sharp_stick Dec 2014 #37
Complete psych workup would ork for me. Skidmore Dec 2014 #3
I think this should be a requirement for anyone to run for public office Triana Dec 2014 #42
Here's a pledge... TreasonousBastard Dec 2014 #6
I love you. JaneyVee Dec 2014 #13
it's poetry. Voice for Peace Dec 2014 #15
I want them to prove they *are* on drugs. At least that would help explain recent events . . . Journeyman Dec 2014 #7
I pretty much don't want ANYBODY drug tested. Liberal Veteran Dec 2014 #8
+1 nt NutmegYankee Dec 2014 #22
Ditto. I work a lowly job in a hospital and am subject to random drug testing. In japple Dec 2014 #23
I agree. Pacifist Patriot Dec 2014 #43
Don't look at me. I'm not going to hold the freaking cup. n/t nichomachus Dec 2014 #9
awesome idea! n/t wildbilln864 Dec 2014 #10
Well if the majority of people want it, it will never happen with this Congress. Rex Dec 2014 #11
and if tested positive does it disqualify the member from serving ? JI7 Dec 2014 #12
Also they loose any federal pension that they might have earned while in cstanleytech Dec 2014 #17
Don't waste the money. How could they not be on drugs? mahannah Dec 2014 #16
Pre-voting breathalyzer checks. Half-Century Man Dec 2014 #18
yep azureblue Dec 2014 #25
I don't know if I'd restrict their access. Half-Century Man Dec 2014 #30
They'd just pay someone TBF Dec 2014 #20
Not if it can detect DNA.. Biometric scanner... Lugano Dec 2014 #33
... TBF Dec 2014 #35
That's assuming they can pee straight! MrMickeysMom Dec 2014 #21
Ha!!! Initech Dec 2014 #24
Of course they can. They were briefed by the Committee on Small Business. pinboy3niner Dec 2014 #28
good one, pin boy! MrMickeysMom Dec 2014 #39
Cops need to be tested for trugs too notadmblnd Dec 2014 #26
Indeed. KamaAina Dec 2014 #29
fuck that. hair tests. no compromises. elehhhhna Dec 2014 #27
Ah c'mon, you know better than that jmowreader Dec 2014 #38
Could have done without the visual. Liberal Veteran Dec 2014 #40
LOL! I thought this was a Borowitz or Onion thingy... LOL! 2banon Dec 2014 #36
Pre-employment drug testing hasn't saved a dime. nilesobek Dec 2014 #41
Money doesn't show up in urine. n/t Orsino Dec 2014 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Americans Want Congress M...