Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I just want ignition interlocks sharp_stick Dec 2014 #1
Not Boner, that's for sure KamaAina Dec 2014 #2
Very true sharp_stick Dec 2014 #4
Johnny Walker Orange. nt msanthrope Dec 2014 #5
:D C Moon Dec 2014 #19
A whole new brand sharp_stick Dec 2014 #31
there would be a designated blow flunky on the payroll. Voice for Peace Dec 2014 #14
I'm telling you sharp_stick Dec 2014 #32
no convincing needed here. Voice for Peace Dec 2014 #34
It's sad isn't it? n/t sharp_stick Dec 2014 #37
Complete psych workup would ork for me. Skidmore Dec 2014 #3
I think this should be a requirement for anyone to run for public office Triana Dec 2014 #42
Here's a pledge... TreasonousBastard Dec 2014 #6
I love you. JaneyVee Dec 2014 #13
it's poetry. Voice for Peace Dec 2014 #15
I want them to prove they *are* on drugs. At least that would help explain recent events . . . Journeyman Dec 2014 #7
I pretty much don't want ANYBODY drug tested. Liberal Veteran Dec 2014 #8
+1 nt NutmegYankee Dec 2014 #22
Ditto. I work a lowly job in a hospital and am subject to random drug testing. In japple Dec 2014 #23
I agree. Pacifist Patriot Dec 2014 #43
Don't look at me. I'm not going to hold the freaking cup. n/t nichomachus Dec 2014 #9
awesome idea! n/t wildbilln864 Dec 2014 #10
Well if the majority of people want it, it will never happen with this Congress. Rex Dec 2014 #11
and if tested positive does it disqualify the member from serving ? JI7 Dec 2014 #12
Also they loose any federal pension that they might have earned while in cstanleytech Dec 2014 #17
Don't waste the money. How could they not be on drugs? mahannah Dec 2014 #16
Pre-voting breathalyzer checks. Half-Century Man Dec 2014 #18
yep azureblue Dec 2014 #25
I don't know if I'd restrict their access. Half-Century Man Dec 2014 #30
They'd just pay someone TBF Dec 2014 #20
Not if it can detect DNA.. Biometric scanner... Lugano Dec 2014 #33
... TBF Dec 2014 #35
That's assuming they can pee straight! MrMickeysMom Dec 2014 #21
Ha!!! Initech Dec 2014 #24
Of course they can. They were briefed by the Committee on Small Business. pinboy3niner Dec 2014 #28
good one, pin boy! MrMickeysMom Dec 2014 #39
Cops need to be tested for trugs too notadmblnd Dec 2014 #26
Indeed. KamaAina Dec 2014 #29
fuck that. hair tests. no compromises. elehhhhna Dec 2014 #27
Ah c'mon, you know better than that jmowreader Dec 2014 #38
Could have done without the visual. Liberal Veteran Dec 2014 #40
LOL! I thought this was a Borowitz or Onion thingy... LOL! 2banon Dec 2014 #36
Pre-employment drug testing hasn't saved a dime. nilesobek Dec 2014 #41
Money doesn't show up in urine. n/t Orsino Dec 2014 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Americans Want Congress M...»Reply #34