Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This message was self-deleted by its author [View all]gollygee
(22,336 posts)22. Exactly the same?
I don't recall people being kidnapped, shipped over, and then sold as chattel under the name "cracker." What history book was that in?
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
121 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The fact you drew out the racist element so fast and hatefully earns a big k&r from me. Great post!
marble falls
Dec 2014
#7
Closed doors, nothing. I was on that jury and I voted 'leave it alone'....
marble falls
Dec 2014
#14
I respectfully disagree. It may very well mean something nasty to you. Here in Florida..
BlueJazz
Dec 2014
#26
Its a term based on attitudes and values. When I call my grandfather a "cracker", who actually was
marble falls
Dec 2014
#106
People don't get to decide. The term is hurtful. Ask a parent of a Down's child what they think of
joeglow3
Dec 2014
#109
cracker isn't on the same level of the 'r' word. And yes, people do get to decide. When I was a ...
marble falls
Dec 2014
#113
I have heard people say the same thing about the n word (they r talking about an attitude, not race)
joeglow3
Dec 2014
#121
This subject is close to me. Cracker doesn't offend me. Using it to claim some sort of reverse...
marble falls
Dec 2014
#24
Yes, our "master" is losing his/her touch, not responding to anybody in the thread anyway.
snooper2
Dec 2014
#44
It's bullshit, LTH. We used to delete or lock threads and posts for using it. What bullshit.
NYC_SKP
Dec 2014
#46
All people ought to learn these important facts: If you want to change the police forces
kelliekat44
Dec 2014
#47
The jury messed up here. TMN is using 'cracker' as a general description, not as a directed epithet.
Dreamer Tatum
Dec 2014
#49
I think sticking pins in something on the logic that you're tired of pins being stuck elsewhere
Dreamer Tatum
Dec 2014
#75
The word does not have a history and context associated with it that would cause offense
gollygee
Dec 2014
#79
People could use a lot of things as a slur, but not all words have the same history and context
gollygee
Dec 2014
#84
It can't even become particularly offensive, unless there's a huge power shift
gollygee
Dec 2014
#86
The problem is, you're not uniquely entitled to determine what is offensive
Dreamer Tatum
Dec 2014
#83
Part of the outrage is the OP's utter indifference in responding in his own thread.
randome
Dec 2014
#93
Rex, I expected better from you. Nothing like that is going to happen to us white folks.
marble falls
Dec 2014
#108
Your post shows that you are very much a part of the "society who are indifferent"
Renew Deal
Dec 2014
#56
Geeze. It's like you discovered a new word. You used 'crackers' three times in one OP.
randome
Dec 2014
#57
'Nothing"??? One post and the OP knows "nothing" at all about human nature? nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Dec 2014
#102
One post and the OP know 'nothing' about human nature? You didn't answer my question. nt
ChisolmTrailDem
Dec 2014
#120