Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Logical

(22,457 posts)
28. Not cranky, just tired of the "Obama is Perfect". We will know soon if you or the NYT are correct.
Sat Apr 21, 2012, 03:45 PM
Apr 2012

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Evidently striving for bipartisanship with wingnuts has a down side.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #1
Yes, he was a little naive about that I agree! Logical Apr 2012 #2
Naive? Fumesucker Apr 2012 #5
Yes, he was. He held on to the belief that the GOP would cooperate.... Logical Apr 2012 #7
Let's see how things pan out after the election.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #11
I think he will also. I think Romney will end up looking like a fool. And I think 2008.... Logical Apr 2012 #13
Yep, why would he? Marr Apr 2012 #20
Actually, I disagree with you on this one. PragmaticLiberal Apr 2012 #33
Well, reasonable people can disagree, of course, but-- Marr Apr 2012 #36
But reality is, we need to get behind this President for re-election because the other side of the teddy51 Apr 2012 #3
100% agree. Obama is better than any GOP idiot. But voting is one thing. Donating and working.... Logical Apr 2012 #4
One question Canuckistanian Apr 2012 #6
To smart voters it does. But not many of them are on the GOP side. Advertising makes people.... Logical Apr 2012 #8
Because getting information like the Corporate Parasite thread jsmirman Apr 2012 #9
A woman once told Adlai Stevenson that he had the support of every thinking person.. Fumesucker Apr 2012 #10
I agree. He could go on ANY talk show ANY time he wants. No one would turn him down. Plus FarLeftFist Apr 2012 #12
What a ridiculous article. I know Obama's leftist critics like to glom onto shit like this, but... Tarheel_Dem Apr 2012 #14
Obama held on to the bipartisan stuff way to long. Long after the GOP..... Logical Apr 2012 #15
I don't put too much stock in what "progressives say". Bitter progressive opponents have been.... Tarheel_Dem Apr 2012 #16
Anyone who is not disappointed in Obama had much lower expectations than I did. But I am ..... Logical Apr 2012 #17
Your "expectations" are beside the point. You posted an article that in no way.... Tarheel_Dem Apr 2012 #18
Well, of you are right then money should not be an issue. We will see. Logical Apr 2012 #19
If your theories bore any resemblance to actual fact, I would challenge you to explain.... Tarheel_Dem Apr 2012 #21
We can agree the professional left can just sit this one out. Obama should be OK with that also..... Logical Apr 2012 #23
You obviously thought it had some merit, or else, why post it? Tarheel_Dem Apr 2012 #25
Not cranky, just tired of the "Obama is Perfect". We will know soon if you or the NYT are correct. Logical Apr 2012 #28
Since you used "quotes", I'm gonna assume you can provide a link to "Obama is Perfect"? Tarheel_Dem Apr 2012 #31
Post removed Post removed Apr 2012 #34
What's really "telling" is you've resorted to namecalling. Who's the "jerk" again? Tarheel_Dem Apr 2012 #38
"You've become tired & cranky. A nap might just be the cure." deserves name calling! Logical Apr 2012 #40
Yeah, but I didn't call you a name. You may infer from it what you will, but the fact remains..... Tarheel_Dem Apr 2012 #43
I got two PMs with some links. LOL, I understand you much better now. n-t Logical Apr 2012 #46
All the pm's and links in the world won't change the fact that when you're on the losing end..... Tarheel_Dem Apr 2012 #48
and some will cheer this type of crap... dionysus Apr 2012 #41
That was the whole point, doncha know? Tarheel_Dem Apr 2012 #42
the media is gonna frame Obama as the loser, no matter what happens....watch. spanone Apr 2012 #22
Is it a surprise that Corporate America is more enthusiastic about supporting one of their own? AZ Progressive Apr 2012 #24
"at the expense of pissing off the liberal base", Tarheel_Dem Apr 2012 #30
Clearly that's not the case.. girl gone mad Apr 2012 #37
Spare me your sermonizing. All I heard was Blah, Blah & more Blah. Tarheel_Dem Apr 2012 #39
Perfectly said Number23 Apr 2012 #47
Precisely stated. Tarheel_Dem Apr 2012 #49
And then he should have flown to the moon on gossamer wings. Arkana Apr 2012 #44
Your post is a good case study into the 'DU is not the liberal base" thesis. FarLeftFist Apr 2012 #45
Obama's gonna have to raise a LOT of money though AZ Progressive Apr 2012 #26
I think, if true, this can be used very much to his advantage. sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #27
Good one! calimary Apr 2012 #50
The people who buy our elections think they can get a better deal this year, imo. EFerrari Apr 2012 #29
Obama raised 10x more than RMoney BumRushDaShow Apr 2012 #32
Not too hard to fix... annabanana Apr 2012 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT: Obama Sees Steep Dro...»Reply #28