Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Thinking about the TPP. FDR regarding tariffs: [View all]pampango
(24,692 posts)31. Wages declined from the early 1970's to the mid-1990's then increased. A NAFTA tragedy?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Household_income_in_the_United_States#mediaviewer/File:U.S._Hourly_Wages_-_Real_or_Adjusted_for_Inflation_1964-2014.png
It is fine with me to use another, more realistic measure of living standards. I used per capita GDP to respond to the post:
Any other accurate measure of living standards is fine with me. My point was to ask what happens if we were to restrict trade agreements to countries that have "similar or greater living standards.
As many have pointed out the TPP has little to do with tariffs. I have not seen many conclude that it will cause larger trade deficits.
Our imports are a small part of our economy - 13% - as is total trade - 22%. Imports are a large part of Germany's economy - 34% - while trade is 76%. To blame economic problems on imports or trade ignores what really makes for good wages, strong unions and a healthy middle class.
It is fine with me to use another, more realistic measure of living standards. I used per capita GDP to respond to the post:
The best path is to completely abandon any and all trade deals with nations that do not have a similar or greater living standards.
Any other accurate measure of living standards is fine with me. My point was to ask what happens if we were to restrict trade agreements to countries that have "similar or greater living standards.
The last thing we need is yet another trade deficit.
As many have pointed out the TPP has little to do with tariffs. I have not seen many conclude that it will cause larger trade deficits.
Our imports are a small part of our economy - 13% - as is total trade - 22%. Imports are a large part of Germany's economy - 34% - while trade is 76%. To blame economic problems on imports or trade ignores what really makes for good wages, strong unions and a healthy middle class.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
31 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Here's an actual liberal view(which is of course correct). Maybe you can post something from Fox
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#7
FDR was right on. Tariffs should protect the living standards of the American worker.
Enthusiast
Dec 2014
#2
"In FDR's view high tariffs shifted the burden of financing the government from the rich to the poor
pampango
Dec 2014
#16
Very little of the TPP has anything to do with what tariffs are still existing.
djean111
Dec 2014
#3
I certainly hope you did not think that with my post I was suggesting that the TPP is just about
JDPriestly
Dec 2014
#13
Of course, he campaigned against and negotiated away most of the high tariffs he inherited
pampango
Dec 2014
#15
Unfortunately, as our high trade deficit and declining wages prove, even multilateral trade
JDPriestly
Dec 2014
#17
But the wealth is safely in the hands of the wealthy elite and multinational corporations where
Enthusiast
Dec 2014
#20
Indeed I believe FDR knew that the elite have prospered under high tariffs and low. The key
pampango
Dec 2014
#22
I've posted many times that the TPP is only good if it has strong labor and environmental standards
pampango
Dec 2014
#24
Yeah, we heard about those mythical strong labor and environmental standards
Enthusiast
Dec 2014
#25
That was pretty quick going from "completely abandon any and all trade deals with nations that do
pampango
Dec 2014
#29
Wages declined from the early 1970's to the mid-1990's then increased. A NAFTA tragedy?
pampango
Dec 2014
#31