Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

blm

(114,703 posts)
58. A single link to Kerry's views on roots of terrorism and humanitarian
Thu Dec 11, 2014, 01:17 PM
Dec 2014

solutions as part of the effort combatting it? JEEEEEEZUS Keerist, Scub…..where have you been the last 40 years?

Humanitarian component is NOT being pushed aside.
>>>
“As we build this coalition, I want to underscore that almost every single country on earth has a role to play in eliminating the ISIL threat and the evil that it represents,” he said.

“For some that will mean military assistance, both direct and in the form of training, arming, and advising, equipping. For some it will mean contributing to the desperately needed humanitarian relief effort. For some it will mean helping to identify, track, and cut off ISIL’s funding, and prevent the flow of foreign fighters,” Kerry continued.

“For still others it will mean demolishing the distortion of one of the world’s great peaceful religions and counteracting the propaganda ISIL uses to recruit new supporters,” he said. “And for all it will mean publicly supporting the new inclusive government in Iraq.”

Kerry outlined what several countries have already offered, including the provision of military assistance (Canada, Britain, France, Estonia, Albania, Australia) and humanitarian aid (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, France, Britain, Japan, Australia).

“The UAE [United Arab Emirates] has agreed to take on ISIL’s support networks and beat back against its militant ideological propaganda,” he said.

More from transcript of key meeting:
>>>>
From Jeddah we then went to Paris, in which we had the Paris conference hosted by President Hollande, and that was focused on support for Iraq in its fight against ISIS. And the statement that issued in Paris, 26 nations signed up to a very comprehensive and broad-scale campaign to defeat ISIS. That then led into the Security Council meeting on Friday hosted by Secretary Kerry with almost 40 nations offering their very clear support for Iraq and a comprehensive global campaign, again, to defeat ISIS along these multiples lines of effort.

And this is all anchored by Chapter 7 Security Council Resolution 2170 that was passed right before the NATO summit, which basically discussed the need for all member-states around the entire world to cut down on foreign fighter flows, to restrict the financing of extremist groups like ISIL and associated movements, and also to stop the incitement and legitimization that these groups tend to get.

And this will flow in, of course, to the historic Security Council meeting we’re having tomorrow. And I’m using the word “historic” because I really think if you look at what’s happened over the last six weeks, it truly is historic, which gets to what happened last night and today. I know when we were on the road with a lot of you last week, there was some skepticism of what the coalition was about. We tried to emphasize that this was not only a military coalition; the military piece is only one part of it, but there is a military component. The support I know was described in some articles as tepid.

Obviously, we couldn’t talk about everything that was going on behind the scenes, but behind the scenes we are very actively building a military coalition in order to target ISIL and some of the associated groups in a very effective and fairly comprehensive way with the target packages, and now everybody can see what happened last night.
So that then led into today. And today we had – the meeting I can talk about was President Obama and Secretary Kerry with the new prime minister of Iraq, Prime Minister Abadi, and with the countries from the region who were involved in the operation last night, so UAE, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Jordan, Qatar – all around the table discussing the common threat of ISIL. And I think I would just say the President was very clear in terms of actually laying out where we are, talking about the fact that this is a threat that unifies everybody. And everybody’s head around the table was nodding at the fact that this is a threat that unifies everybody. Everybody around the table agreed that there are times in the world where you need to make a stand, and this is a time in which the world needs to come together and make a stand, but particularly the region needs to come together and make a stand, because this is a threat that is most prominently affecting our partners in the region.

So strong unanimity around the table, the fact that it is time to make a stand, the fact that this is going to be a long-term campaign, the fact that everybody around the table is in it for the long haul. And that was really what this meeting was about. And what made it quite interesting was the fact that Iraq was not only a key component of this meeting, but also a lead participant in talking about the wishes and desires of Iraq to open a new page in the region for all of the regional partners who were also around the table to fully restore relations, to open embassies, to work with bilateral and multilateral forums to help strengthen this new Iraqi Government as it takes on the very, very, very difficult fight that it confronts against ISIS.

So I think, again, if you look at the continuum of what’s happened over the last six weeks and the pretty extraordinary level of diplomacy not only in the region but also around the world, if you look at all the countries that have been brought together at the Security Council last Friday and Paris and of course at NATO, at Jeddah, and Cairo, and then of course, all the bilateral meetings we’ve had, that Secretary Kerry has had in Ankara and Cairo and Baghdad over the last few weeks, you can now see some of the – what we were building towards.

But again, this is only a start. Nobody is looking at this as something that is going to be short-term. We would like to defeat ISIL as fast as we can, but that’s not going to be possible. It’s going to be long-term and there’s going to be a military component; there is going to be a financial component; there is going to be a foreign fighter component, which is key because the foreign fighters are the oxygen that gives these movements their very lifeblood, and that’ll be a focus of the Security Council session tomorrow; there is a humanitarian component; and there is a de-legitimization component. All of these things have to work harmoniously and in an integrated fashion, and that is one reason also that General Allen has been brought on board to help integrate this entire effort and to match coalition contributions to the needs and to make sure the whole thing is synchronized, because this is a very, very difficult endeavor.
>>>

Read more: http://translations.state.gov/st/english/texttrans/2014/09/20140924308819.html#ixzz3LbrbCywb

>>>>>

Really, Scub…you want to claim you don't know Kerry's 40 year record at this point, I direct you to National Security Archives.

If this nation had been smart enough to acknowledge Kerry's efforts on terrorism and act on them back in the 90s, then there never would have been a rise in global terrorism, let alone a 9-11. The humanitarian efforts wouldn't even have become so exploited and so pressing now.

Apparently you, along with corporate-media fed America, ignored his 90s book warning about global terrorism and how it needed to be fought…. legally: The New War

http://www.amazon.com/The-New-War-Threatens-Americas/dp/B006QS9H36


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

What strategic move would you take to halt ISIS? Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #1
It was strategic moves that created ISIS. We need to be focusing more on liberal_at_heart Dec 2014 #4
Kerry's doing that - people don't want to understand how he is doing it. blm Dec 2014 #7
Nothing we are doing right now is decreasing the number of terrorists. liberal_at_heart Dec 2014 #11
That was before Kerry's negotiations to bring Muslim nations blm Dec 2014 #20
"Rooting for"? No. Realistic about. Scuba Dec 2014 #24
Reality - Kerry's goal has always been the right one: blm Dec 2014 #28
Yeah, you just keep believing that fantasy. Scuba Dec 2014 #29
Sorry, Scub - I deal only with reality. You want to join the smears on Kerry blm Dec 2014 #32
I'm still waiting for that link where Kerry advocates humanitarian aid to prevent terror. Scuba Dec 2014 #34
http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/world/2014-09/09/c_126964123.htm blm Dec 2014 #37
So you have no link where Kerry advocates humanitarian aid to end terrorism. Got it. Scuba Dec 2014 #39
Because that has always been his mindset, Scub…whether you want blm Dec 2014 #42
What part of "We do not think an AUMF should include a geographic limitation" do you interpret as .. Scuba Dec 2014 #44
Because it isn't ABOUT geography. It's a worldview and you know it. blm Dec 2014 #48
I don't see Kerry advocating use of any tools except the hammer. That's disappointing. Scuba Dec 2014 #53
See what you want. I've seen and heard it in plenty of his blm Dec 2014 #55
Yet you can't provide a single link. Scuba Dec 2014 #56
A single link to Kerry's views on roots of terrorism and humanitarian blm Dec 2014 #58
I've never previously heard of Kerry's book, let alone read it. Can you cite passages .... Scuba Dec 2014 #59
I'm horrified and sorry that so many rely on corporate media for their news about blm Dec 2014 #60
My apologies for being so ignorant as to not know about a passing reference Kerry made to ... Scuba Dec 2014 #62
You've paid as much attention to Kerry's work as corporate media wanted you. blm Dec 2014 #74
So your position is that issues like food insecurity are the centerpiece of Kerry's diplomacy? Scuba Dec 2014 #77
LOL - I swing by here when I can spare a minute blm Dec 2014 #80
You're hilarious. Kerry abandoned any ideals he had and now touts more failed militarism ... Scuba Dec 2014 #81
I can't MAKE you read, Scuba. blm Dec 2014 #83
You've got nothing. Scuba Dec 2014 #84
Only to someone who refuses to READ. blm Dec 2014 #85
Yet you only have one four-year-old link. Scuba Dec 2014 #86
Nope. What I have is little time to guide you along blm Dec 2014 #87
Oh it is NOT a fantasy. Just facts. mylye2222 Dec 2014 #67
Read the thread. Scuba Dec 2014 #71
Just ignore the beheadings on the other side of the room.... VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #8
Do you seriously think ficusing on decreasing military actions abroad is going to Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #15
Wow. More Democrats who favor war. Somehow not surprising. liberal_at_heart Dec 2014 #16
Okay, I will give you a shot at an intelligent strategic mive here, you tell me Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #18
Instead of bombs, send them food, medicine, iPads and Wii's. Scuba Dec 2014 #25
iPads and Wiis? LordGlenconner Dec 2014 #36
To ISIS, are you serious? They have lots of modern items, they are still cutting off heads Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #40
They don't recruit well cared for citizens with ample leisure activities. Scuba Dec 2014 #43
who do you think they are recruiting? so you think they are going to sit down all day and play Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #46
Naviety LordGlenconner Dec 2014 #47
Why not hookers and blow? I mean, maybe that will keep them from kidnapping, raping, and killing msanthrope Dec 2014 #61
they already have food, ipads and other shit, you do realize most of the terrorists live well JI7 Dec 2014 #68
Surprising? No. Disgusting? Yes. The willful disregard for the simple fact that our military ... Scuba Dec 2014 #65
Well, I suggest Kerry get his helmet out of the closet and take to the front lines Scootaloo Dec 2014 #2
I dont think we should be fighting this war. But given that we are gonna fight it, Vattel Dec 2014 #3
So instead of giving them approval, let's tell them to end the war and vote for liberal_at_heart Dec 2014 #5
Nope. This is progressive use of military instead of targeting entire nations. blm Dec 2014 #10
You can justify it all you want. It is part of the endless war in the Middle East that we have liberal_at_heart Dec 2014 #12
Hard to argue with someone who hasn't a clue what's driving this tact. blm Dec 2014 #13
Oh, give me a break. If you think it is helping you are fooling yourself. liberal_at_heart Dec 2014 #14
If you were truly a THOUGHTFUL anti-war person, you'd understand exactly blm Dec 2014 #19
How is it narrowing when there's no geographical boundaries? I guess Kerry thinks we ... Scuba Dec 2014 #26
If that is what you think Kerry's goal is, then please don't complain when blm Dec 2014 #30
Please link to where Kerry advocates for humanitarian aid as a means of preventing terror. Scuba Dec 2014 #31
Good thing OTHER nation's news organizations respect Kerry: blm Dec 2014 #35
Yeah LOL People trying to portray our military as being a humanitarian aid org is a bad joke. L0oniX Dec 2014 #82
I agree, Cheers! Vattel Dec 2014 #51
Altered to target ISIL/extremists specifically. They aren't expanding war, just narrowing the TARGET blm Dec 2014 #6
thank you.....and THANK GOD cooler heads will prevail VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #9
YES Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #17
do you have a link G_j Dec 2014 #21
I know Kerry's work and know that is exactly what he's been working on blm Dec 2014 #22
Do you have a link to the where the AUMF has been altered to target ISIL specifically? Autumn Dec 2014 #41
LOL - Sorry I have the ability to connect ALL the historical dots. blm Dec 2014 #45
Then your post is indeed a fantasy and the wording HAS NOT been changed to target ISIL Autumn Dec 2014 #49
I was referring to the changes being sought as per the OP article. blm Dec 2014 #54
If you want to make sure ISIL never goes away, hughee99 Dec 2014 #23
They can shrink it to a regional law enforcement effort. blm Dec 2014 #27
Common Dreams...of course brooklynite Dec 2014 #33
Is common Dreams a RW site or just one you don't like? Autumn Dec 2014 #38
Common dreams is a left-wing sites that takes an extreme view on issues with a lot of hyperbole brooklynite Dec 2014 #50
Okay. As a Democrat I like left wing. Autumn Dec 2014 #57
And as a centrist, I have no objection to it... brooklynite Dec 2014 #63
There's Nothing in the Middle of the Road but Yellow Stripes and Dead Armadillos Autumn Dec 2014 #66
No, because I'm not a philosophical centrist...I'm a POLICY centrist brooklynite Dec 2014 #70
got the shirt Baclava Dec 2014 #52
Fuck John Kerry Aerows Dec 2014 #64
Say better F... HRC and her faar more hawkish inclinements!!!! mylye2222 Dec 2014 #69
Kick for corruption woo me with science Dec 2014 #72
What corruption would that be? Any actual Details? blm Dec 2014 #75
I was surprised you guys missed that keyword before now. woo me with science Dec 2014 #76
Kerry is NOT a tool and he's not corruptible. blm Dec 2014 #78
He's Superman! L0oniX Dec 2014 #79
Well, you are welcome to name one other lawmaker who has blm Dec 2014 #88
"not corruptible" was your words not mine so yea ...Superman. L0oniX Dec 2014 #89
LOL - iow, you can't name one. blm Dec 2014 #90
I have no problem with you thinking rich people like Kerry are not corruptible. That's your thing. L0oniX Dec 2014 #91
Doesn't bother me that you don't know your history - blm Dec 2014 #92
Doesn't bother me that you think rich people are uncorruptible. L0oniX Dec 2014 #95
Bwah! woo me with science Dec 2014 #93
kick woo me with science Dec 2014 #73
Now I always have to wonder fadedrose Dec 2014 #94
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here We Go Again! "...»Reply #58