General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Some folks seem more OK with the defense of torture and torturers, [View all]MADem
(135,425 posts)The AG is independent from the POTUS in matters of prosecution and does not bow to him. He doesn't work "for" Obama, any more than Janet Reno "worked for" Bill Clinton when it came to matters of prosecution. Clinton couldn't tell Reno "Don't look into anything I've done." That's not how it works.
You seem to forget a guy named Nixon who told a guy named Richardson to fire a guy named Cox. Richardson told him fuck no and resigned. A cretin named Bork finally went and did it...and thus the term "Borked" came into popular usage when Bork wanted to fulfill his nasty little dream of becoming a member of the Supreme Court.
And remember when Alberto Gonzales tried to game the system and dump all those pesky states' attorneys? http://www.salon.com/2007/02/09/united_states_attorneys/
Why do you think it will go over any better if Obama tries to tell the AG what to do? He can't "tell" Holder (or Holder's replacement) to prosecute anymore than he can "tell" Holder's replacement to NOT prosecute. The AG has to go where the evidence takes him--or her--not where Obama tells him to go.