Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Liberals: Obama Abandoned Us - Politico [View all]RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)90. Absolutely nuts, eh? Gee thanks!
I'm proud to be joined by fellow crazy Chris Hedges in my assessment of the President:
AMY GOODMAN: Your assessment of President Obama?
CHRIS HEDGES: A disaster. A poster child for the bankruptcy of the liberal class. Somebody who, like Clinton, is a self-identified liberal, who speaks in the traditional language of liberalism but has made war against the core values of liberalism, which is a concern for those people outside the narrow power elite. And the tragedy, if tragedy is the right word, is that Obama, who made this Faustian bargain with corporate interests in order to gain power, has now been crumpled up and thrown away by these interests. They dont need him anymore. He functioned as a brand after the disastrous eight years of George Bush.
And what we are watching is an even more craven attempt on the part of the White House to cater to the forces that are literally destroying the United States, have reconfigured, are reconfiguring this country into a form of neofeudalism. And all of the traditional the pillars of the liberal establishment, that once provided some kind of protection and, more importantly, a kind of safety valve, a mechanism by which legitimate grievances and injustices in this country could be addressed, have shut tight. They no longer work. And so, we are getting these terrifying, proto-fascist movements that are leaping up around the fringes of American society and have as their anger not only a rage against government, but a rage against liberals, as well. And I would say that rage is not misplaced.
CHRIS HEDGES: A disaster. A poster child for the bankruptcy of the liberal class. Somebody who, like Clinton, is a self-identified liberal, who speaks in the traditional language of liberalism but has made war against the core values of liberalism, which is a concern for those people outside the narrow power elite. And the tragedy, if tragedy is the right word, is that Obama, who made this Faustian bargain with corporate interests in order to gain power, has now been crumpled up and thrown away by these interests. They dont need him anymore. He functioned as a brand after the disastrous eight years of George Bush.
And what we are watching is an even more craven attempt on the part of the White House to cater to the forces that are literally destroying the United States, have reconfigured, are reconfiguring this country into a form of neofeudalism. And all of the traditional the pillars of the liberal establishment, that once provided some kind of protection and, more importantly, a kind of safety valve, a mechanism by which legitimate grievances and injustices in this country could be addressed, have shut tight. They no longer work. And so, we are getting these terrifying, proto-fascist movements that are leaping up around the fringes of American society and have as their anger not only a rage against government, but a rage against liberals, as well. And I would say that rage is not misplaced.
Chris Hedges: Obama is a "Poster Child for the Death of the Liberal Class"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
113 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Interesting opinion pieces some folk use to bash the President...who needs Fox when we got DU?
Fred Sanders
Dec 2014
#24
Are there not enough liberal sources that we have to use cons sources all the time? Or am I the one
Fred Sanders
Dec 2014
#12
Then tell us the truth -- was Obama actually lobbying hard against the sellout bill?
Jim Lane
Dec 2014
#54
Yes, absolutely nuts. I'm proud to be joined by the vast majority of liberals in this country.
NYC Liberal
Dec 2014
#103
Whoops! Even the President disagrees with you. But don't worry. Keep on dreaming.
RufusTFirefly
Dec 2014
#93
I look at actions. President Obama is a progressive, liberal Democrat. And the vast majority of
NYC Liberal
Dec 2014
#101
I don't need a "con" source to tell me I've been sold out for the last 6 years.
Fuddnik
Dec 2014
#66
What about his Black Magic Kenyan juju sticks? Folks want to know why he does not use them.
Fred Sanders
Dec 2014
#23
And once again, jiberish. Do you support the Democrats decision to help the Republicans? nm
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#91
He does propose budgets and veto or sign. BTW, Reply 17 was not all about Obama.
merrily
Dec 2014
#29
Seems to me your philosophy is to continue to give in. You always have a rationalization.
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#92
Well for some of us.. those that don't have a briefcase full of money to drop off
SomethingFishy
Dec 2014
#95
Putting windows and an upstairs apartment on the horse makes me suspect it might have people inside.
tclambert
Dec 2014
#68
"it may take another 6 years for the BOG to wake up and smell the corruption"
BeanMusical
Dec 2014
#69
look, the moment Obama criticizes Clinton II he's gonna get the full Swarm treatment
MisterP
Dec 2014
#82
it's probably worth noting that liberals abandoned voting before Obama abandoned liberals
Bucky
Dec 2014
#70
Obama was never "with" liberals. And he doesn't even put up a good false face pretending otherwise..
blkmusclmachine
Dec 2014
#71
I agree. There is way more wrong with this bill than just the bank give away. If that is the only
liberal_at_heart
Dec 2014
#94