Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This "Patriots" argument is embarrassing to watch [View all]Marr
(20,317 posts)38. I don't think it's as black and white as you're suggesting. From my perspective--
that particular argument has liberals on one side decrying the fact that the president minimized the crime of torture for political expediency, and party loyalists on the other attempting to re-frame the argument into a cartoonish strawman; that Obama is accused of 'praising torture'.
It's right for liberals to make noise about the political establishment just 'moving on' from the torture issue without addressing it, and by addressing it, I mean legal proceedings against the people who instituted these illegal policies and the people who carried them out. That is not 'climbing onto a high horse and pontificating'.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I've always thought that the problem was that Dems argue because they think for themselves.
tecelote
Dec 2014
#2
You can be embarrassed all you want. I don't care. I am proud to be a liberal and proud that some
liberal_at_heart
Dec 2014
#5
When he used the words patriots he was explaining why he didn't think we should prosecute so
liberal_at_heart
Dec 2014
#12
Well the OP can feel however he/she wants. Both points about policy and the words used to justify
liberal_at_heart
Dec 2014
#17
Because he has no influence over who his Department of Justice prosecutes?
liberal_at_heart
Dec 2014
#36
And you define anything but blind faith as hate. Democrats don't blindly follow.
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#21
He is not liberal if he doesn't understand that Liberal Democrats do not blindly follow. nm
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#22
Really this has nothing to do with his moral code, this has to do with crime going unpunished.
Rex
Dec 2014
#18
I agree that the bullcrap about patriots is embarrassing. We have a DEmocratic president
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#23
One should never let some wonky policy issue, like holding war criminals accountable,
Maedhros
Dec 2014
#27
The point is not that he called them "patriots" but that he didn't prosecute them
tularetom
Dec 2014
#28
the left doesn't win elections because it doesn't represent any moneyed faction
MisterP
Dec 2014
#31
When it comes to torture isn't absolutism okay. The RW is the one currently arguing it isn't
Johonny
Dec 2014
#42
Most of us on the left are more concerned about torture & not Obama's approval ratings.
U4ikLefty
Dec 2014
#45