Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If you believe Obama is protecting torturers, then you're advocating his impeachment. [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)47. Nope, no one made me, but I am not complaining that anyone did, either.
I said and meant that I find it interesting what motivates infrequent posters to post. For you, it agreeing with a bunch of rationalizations about torture was the motivation for one of your rare posts. Why should I not notice that and remark about it?
I'm not your victim.
Exactly my point. So stop acting as though you think you are. Or don't. It's entirely up to you.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
56 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If you believe Obama is protecting torturers, then you're advocating his impeachment. [View all]
True Blue Door
Dec 2014
OP
but they wouldn't be able to use DU if they did that , and that's even MORE important
JI7
Dec 2014
#3
Well, if indeed he is protecting them (not saying he is), perhaps he deserves impeachment
Reter
Dec 2014
#5
I like how you write, I think you went to school instead of that internet course Swearinger 101.
LawDeeDah
Dec 2014
#7
Member since 2007. Under 500 posts. Yet, agreeing with this OP motivated one of your rare posts.
merrily
Dec 2014
#29
Yep. It's true and yes, lots of "long time lurkers." We're all free to post as we wish.
merrily
Dec 2014
#44
That is what is called a sophism. I eat apples. I eat oranges. Therefor apples are oranges.
robinlynne
Dec 2014
#16
No, he is being called on to do his duty to the constitution, the rule of law, justice, and humanity
TheKentuckian
Dec 2014
#17
If Obama is protecting torturers, I am advocating for his impeachment and I'm not ashamed to say it.
951-Riverside
Dec 2014
#22
Opposing torture = teabagger. On DU, Opposite Day doesn't come only once a year.
merrily
Dec 2014
#28
Every president that America has ever had committed acts worthy of impeachment.
SolutionisSolidarity
Dec 2014
#31
Why would the GOP want to impeach Obama for colluding with them to not prosecute GOPers?
Nuclear Unicorn
Dec 2014
#49
"You've already gone halfway there by distracting the discussion away from torture"
Number23
Dec 2014
#53