Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Food Stamp Challenge starts on 4/23 - can you live on $35 a week for food? (no free/already bought) [View all]newspeak
(4,847 posts)90. is this challenge because the repugs in congress
passed a bill in house to decrease the amount of food stamps? I mean we can't tax the wealthy, it might be some kind of burden on them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
115 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Food Stamp Challenge starts on 4/23 - can you live on $35 a week for food? (no free/already bought) [View all]
Liberal_in_LA
Apr 2012
OP
Although you say meat is more of a flavoring, implying that is a bad thing,
nobodyspecial
Apr 2012
#12
Didn't you supplement the food stamps with SOME cash? I think that's what most people
Honeycombe8
Apr 2012
#77
What cash? At that time, my only income was child support which barely covered
Arkansas Granny
Apr 2012
#89
I don't think the challenge allows eating from your backyard because most people on food stamps
Liberal_in_LA
Apr 2012
#7
I realize the challange doesn't allow it but that is a bit non-realistic.
FedUpWithIt All
Apr 2012
#104
I suppose I could; I'll grant it wouldn't be fun or particularly easy...but why in the world
Johnny Rico
Apr 2012
#4
Being poor is a negative experience. What public polices should be enacted to ameliorate
Johnny Rico
Apr 2012
#15
Some people can't afford their own car, and have to use public transportation.
Johnny Rico
Apr 2012
#103
If it allows empathy or understanding to other people who may not have your insight,
LanternWaste
Apr 2012
#106
It's my experience that you can't really know without the experience. Not sure that playacting
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#112
However, in many cases, our actions certainly are predicated on our emotions. And rather than gettin
LanternWaste
Apr 2012
#108
I believe the intent is to raise awareness of the choices available to those
Arkansas Granny
Apr 2012
#35
Since I use my own money to buy food, I'm perfectly aware of what $35 will buy.
Johnny Rico
Apr 2012
#102
That's very good. I try to go for all fresh food. I have to eat it fast, though, or lose it.
freshwest
Apr 2012
#44
Food stamp benefits are not intended to pay for all groceries, that's why as income rises...
JVS
Apr 2012
#56
I just did a quick bit of googling, and the maximum benefits for a single person seems to be $200
Johnny Rico
Apr 2012
#57
I agree it's not the average, but my understanding is that as one increases one's resources
Johnny Rico
Apr 2012
#92
I lived on about $35 or less in college - About $5/day was typical.
OneTenthofOnePercent
Apr 2012
#40
I make it under that but that's because I believe the grocery stores do not deserve to have my money
RB TexLa
Apr 2012
#52
When you buy food, you ARE "having" your money. You are using it to stay alive & be healthy.
Honeycombe8
Apr 2012
#79
Saving is obviously good, but if you're just being cheap to hoard it, that's kind of weird & selfish
TheCruces
Apr 2012
#97
Nope! Only if I grew a lot of my own and that would require having some property
Cleita
Apr 2012
#65
I would love to think that I could but I know better....food stamps must be unbelievably hard
Rowdyboy
Apr 2012
#71
probably but it would be a lot of crap food which is high in sodium & starches.
WI_DEM
Apr 2012
#107