Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

joshcryer

(62,536 posts)
49. No.
Mon Dec 15, 2014, 01:31 AM
Dec 2014

I've been watching her closely since reading her book and she's come off as a demagogue of the highest order. She got seniority almost right away. Has introduced no substantive legislation to solve the problems that she decries, and generally rails on other administrators who are doing the best job that they can.

It reminds me of her first Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing how she asked about if anyone was going to trial and kept repeating it over and over as if it was a solution to something. Asking it of administrators, people whose entire lives have been doing administrative work, following policies already implemented by the previous administrators, and implementing changes as legislated by politicians like Warren. Here's a hint, the only administration on the panel with enforcement power was the SEC, who is the most rebuffed administration in the country when it comes to crony judges overturning them.

She then snidely goes down the list of panelists asking them what they have done, who they took to trial, when she gets a response that the administrations' powers in questions can't do that, she "moves on" down the list of administrators. Then she asks why banks trade at below book value, very sensible question and implication (if you break up the banks and they aren't cooking their books, then the total conglomeration of the book value of the banks goes up; Citigroup is actually considering doing this to itself, GM at least did it to itself and its own financial service subsidiary).

1:52 here.

It went further at the later Federal Reserve hearing where she grilled Yellen and acted as if the Federal Reserve was failing to do proper analysis on banks' living wills, when all it would take for Warren is to go after the banks themselves through legislation to assure that the banks provided comprehensive living wills themselves via a third party, as opposed to forcing the Federal Reserve to go over tens of thousands of pages of paperwork.

It's all talk, bluster, it reminds me of another Senator who ran with amazing rhetoric that got millions of people to rally around them. Similar backgrounds, too, no real early aspirations to lead, no real early aspirations to hold public office. Just the whole academic / community organizer approach to things.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No. bigwillq Dec 2014 #1
Same here nt newfie11 Dec 2014 #10
Yes. 840high Dec 2014 #19
Yes. I would like to see a woman President before I die, Bernie is also my first choice. Autumn Dec 2014 #2
Too soon to say. silverweb Dec 2014 #3
I agree Andy823 Dec 2014 #18
Agree completely. silverweb Dec 2014 #26
She kicked so much Senate ass this week, I'm starting to want to keep her there to kick more! arcane1 Dec 2014 #4
second after Bernie nt G_j Dec 2014 #5
Sanders Or Warren... fredamae Dec 2014 #6
I'm in a caucus state Nevernose Dec 2014 #7
I'm a Hillary supporter but would welcome Warren into the race, Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #8
I'd like to see the full menu and ask a few questions about ingredients and preparation prior to Bluenorthwest Dec 2014 #9
+1 silverweb Dec 2014 #27
I really like Warren, but she'll need to get up to speed on areas outside her expertise. amandabeech Dec 2014 #11
I'd vote for Warren or Sanders, but to be honest, I can hardly bear to see someone I admire Stardust Dec 2014 #12
Yes PAProgressive28 Dec 2014 #13
I voted "Other"; because ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #14
I have major issues with her openly declaring giftedgirl77 Dec 2014 #44
There's a good probability, LWolf Dec 2014 #15
Yes, and I would work hard for her campaign deutsey Dec 2014 #16
+1 RiverLover Dec 2014 #36
Bernie said he may run. Elizabeth said she isn't running. So Zorra Dec 2014 #17
She's said, "I'm not running", and this is true. She isn't. No one is. Yet. RiverLover Dec 2014 #24
I support Bernie at this point, because woo me with science Dec 2014 #20
Yes, she is at the top of my list. Brigid Dec 2014 #21
Probably, barring anyone else that has similar appeal. I certainly am not voting for HRC. 2banon Dec 2014 #22
But Manny, she's the "Tea Left" with ideas that will set us back decades, just like the "Tea Right" WhaTHellsgoingonhere Dec 2014 #23
Yep, apparently "tea left" TDale313 Dec 2014 #33
tea left, turd right The t's have it aspirant Dec 2014 #34
See, Manny, Chuck Todd says she's batshit crazy like Ted Cruz! WhaTHellsgoingonhere Dec 2014 #25
Even Fox News is reporting she's going to shutdown the government! WhaTHellsgoingonhere Dec 2014 #30
Not just the media Rosa Luxemburg Dec 2014 #37
I'd back either Warren or Sanders. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Dec 2014 #28
Senator Bernie Sanders would be my first choice. nt Ilsa Dec 2014 #29
Absolutely. Iggo Dec 2014 #31
Elizabeth or Bernie donco Dec 2014 #32
Yes. Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #35
I'm provisionally holding out for Sanders (provided he, of course, changes his KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #38
No. i am backing Hillary. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #39
I would vote for her in a heartbeat. Terra Alta Dec 2014 #40
I'm not jumping on any bandwagons yet dflprincess Dec 2014 #41
She'd be near the top of my list, but I still have some questions. BillZBubb Dec 2014 #42
yes helpmetohelpyou Dec 2014 #43
No, because I don't know enough about her positions Prophet 451 Dec 2014 #45
IIRC... MannyGoldstein Dec 2014 #46
That all sounds good Prophet 451 Dec 2014 #47
I like Bernie more, but Elizabeth can win... DemocraticWing Dec 2014 #48
No. joshcryer Dec 2014 #49
+1. That's been my strong impression too. Thanks for doing the homework! ucrdem Dec 2014 #51
You're right, that was being too harsh on PBO. joshcryer Dec 2014 #52
Pretty sure that her name, "Warren", only has 2 "r's" in it. Major Hogwash Dec 2014 #50
It is close but she may be a better senator than president. She has incredible knowledge and pampango Dec 2014 #53
I'll happily support her if she is nominated, but I'm leaning towards Schweitzer as of now (nt) Recursion Dec 2014 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If Elizabeth Warren annou...»Reply #49