Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
I wish... wildbilln864 Dec 2014 #1
She did. Check out the whole interview. FSogol Dec 2014 #3
She doesn't explain it because she never says she isn't going to run. RiverLover Dec 2014 #7
she isn't running for president...how thick do people have to be? snooper2 Dec 2014 #19
I agree: She's not running for President. Scuba Dec 2014 #39
no she didn't leave it open she isn't running, she isn't running she isn't fucking running snooper2 Dec 2014 #47
So why didn't she say "I will not run" when asked about it? Scuba Dec 2014 #51
In other words, "why didn't she respond in exactly the way DU wants it framed?" brooklynite Dec 2014 #84
She has carefully avoided saying "I will not run in 2016". Scuba Dec 2014 #102
...besides, how do you know she didn't have her fingers crossed? brooklynite Dec 2014 #109
In other words, she is a dishonest equivocator!!! longship Dec 2014 #151
False choice, but good try. Scuba Dec 2014 #156
She has repeatedly said she is not running in 2016!!!! longship Dec 2014 #161
Hey, your cut was better than the "she'd be a quitter just like Sarah" bullshit. Scuba Dec 2014 #165
So, she's an equivocator? longship Dec 2014 #168
Hardly. She's just smart. Scuba Dec 2014 #178
Name calling? Really Scuba? longship Dec 2014 #184
No, she's not an equivocator like Hillary, I don't think so. InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2014 #186
Do you have trouble with dumbcat Dec 2014 #70
I'm sorry you have a dumb cat snooper2 Dec 2014 #73
Does your smart cat know about English tenses? dumbcat Dec 2014 #116
my smart cat knows that "I'm not running" means "I'm not running" snooper2 Dec 2014 #117
But Hillary claims she is not running too krawhitham Dec 2014 #193
Yup, Im not running for President either, but I might. hahaha InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2014 #185
You didnt say never! Orsino Dec 2014 #200
Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #59
well a good chunk of americans are religious so people do like their fantasies snooper2 Dec 2014 #60
Almost every liberal I know "wants Liz just where she is" through 2016. I'm a little suspicious maddiemom Dec 2014 #62
Agreed ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #71
And neither is Hillary currently. Plus she has said many times she will not run in 2016 krawhitham Dec 2014 #191
If she were to run now, having said what she said.... Adrahil Dec 2014 #75
Thanks, FSogal, Where does Elizabeth Cha Dec 2014 #130
Right here: FSogol Dec 2014 #134
Thank you, exactly.. "We didn't want to shut down the government." Cha Dec 2014 #135
Since she is the new Messiah and a flawless leader treestar Dec 2014 #9
Not a messiah & not perfect, she voted against GMO labeling... RiverLover Dec 2014 #12
DU would turn on her in a split second Gman Dec 2014 #17
She voted against it as a Senator, I still support her 100%. Autumn Dec 2014 #23
True. n/t FSogol Dec 2014 #100
I wouldn't. Marr Dec 2014 #113
Someone said last year that if there were an EWG group in 2017, like there is a BOG group now . . . Major Hogwash Dec 2014 #189
Agreed. They're little more than whiners Gman Dec 2014 #209
This is why QuestionAlways Dec 2014 #18
based on the polls.. 2banon Dec 2014 #44
Being President is a horrible job! yeoman6987 Dec 2014 #30
She did ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #57
Indeed YoungDemCA Dec 2014 #177
That's true! She's not running! No one is! Yet!!!! RiverLover Dec 2014 #2
Clap for Tinkerbell! nt msanthrope Dec 2014 #10
Must be worried trying to diminish Warren supporters like that. It's cute, really. RiverLover Dec 2014 #13
Hi! She certainly is generating a lot of buzz. That other post became quite lively, the one on appalachiablue Dec 2014 #32
And then click your heels together twice. I think that MineralMan Dec 2014 #63
Off topic, but when everyone clapped for Tinkerbell, she got better Healthcare than what the FSogol Dec 2014 #92
You mean if you think Hillary is a good candidate? nt Logical Dec 2014 #96
Heheh... SidDithers Dec 2014 #179
It's all you, Sid! nt msanthrope Dec 2014 #181
I think she doesn't want to shut the door on possibilities in the future but i don't hrmjustin Dec 2014 #35
My guess is she doesn't want to go through a grueling campaign. hrmjustin Dec 2014 #4
I suppose it now means Hillary all the way. (nt) Albertoo Dec 2014 #5
It could mean a repuke POTUS 2016. L0oniX Dec 2014 #28
That will depend on their candidate Albertoo Dec 2014 #33
Many Dems will switch to Ind and won't vote for Hillary. L0oniX Dec 2014 #37
That Would Be yellowwoodII Dec 2014 #53
Many argued Gore was no better than Bush and voted Nader Algernon Moncrieff Dec 2014 #66
Generic equivalent. Save that one for those that won't vote for Hillary. L0oniX Dec 2014 #72
No, it's not a generic equivalent. It is, in fact, suggesting the exact same thing. Algernon Moncrieff Dec 2014 #74
Only if Democrats don't vote for their party's nominee MineralMan Dec 2014 #69
Some aren't into zombie voting for the candidate you select. Some will vote by their conscience... L0oniX Dec 2014 #77
I play no role at all in who becomes the Democratic nominee. MineralMan Dec 2014 #78
I don't select candidates. MineralMan Dec 2014 #174
we all select candidates tabbycat31 Dec 2014 #206
Our district election ...the Dem candidate bailed out because of a previous commitment. L0oniX Dec 2014 #207
It happens tabbycat31 Dec 2014 #208
There are qualfied Democrats out there much better than Hillary so INdemo Dec 2014 #163
That's why we have primaries. MineralMan Dec 2014 #172
My point being Hillary is not the annoited one INdemo Dec 2014 #196
I have never said she is. Right now, she's the most likely candidate. MineralMan Dec 2014 #204
It was "All the way with LBJ." Hillary will use a different slogan. Agnosticsherbet Dec 2014 #146
She did refuse to say never treestar Dec 2014 #6
Never is a long time. She could remove herself from the persistant badgering by saying, FSogol Dec 2014 #11
Exactly. treestar Dec 2014 #41
Yeah, forget the "exclaimation point".. and insert "2016". The interviewer gave up too soon. :) Cha Dec 2014 #129
No she didn't. An article said that, she didn't. Just the standard "I'm not running". Insert yet. RiverLover Dec 2014 #141
"..Senator Warren has publicly announced she is not running for President in 2016.." from her Cha Dec 2014 #144
Found something that says "No for 2016" FWIW.. Cha Dec 2014 #133
Excellent find, Cha! Hopefully NOW those "draft Warren for Prez" people on DU will accept BlueCaliDem Dec 2014 #182
She's a woman, she has the right to change her mind. Major Hogwash Dec 2014 #190
Why get sick of her when it is those who who want her to run that keep this alive. She has made it still_one Dec 2014 #38
Yeah, I agree. I'm sick of her supporters treestar Dec 2014 #42
I guess it would be a wash then. HappyMe Dec 2014 #45
When Democrats show that they really are not Democrats than they need bashing. INdemo Dec 2014 #166
Ahhh..... some sanity. I'd vote for Warren in a heartbeat, but apparently not this time around groundloop Dec 2014 #46
Its amazing how obsessed people are with this treestar Dec 2014 #50
Except Joe Biden actually told the press he is considering it still_one Dec 2014 #55
Why leave Martin O'Malley off the list? n/t FSogol Dec 2014 #91
I hope O'Malley doesn't run for POTUS Algernon Moncrieff Dec 2014 #95
That's kind of selfish (jk). I think he'd do well in the White House. n/t FSogol Dec 2014 #103
Yes, Barbara Mikulski will be 80 in 2016... DonViejo Dec 2014 #145
Well... never is pretty definitive. Adrahil Dec 2014 #76
It's smart of her to not say never. It will keep Hillary on her toes. nt Fla Dem Dec 2014 #90
So you're "getting sick" of an outspoken Democratic Senator? That bullwinkle428 Dec 2014 #107
She won't say never cuz she WILL be running. Go Elizabeth! InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2014 #187
What tense did she use? Tense matters. nt msanthrope Dec 2014 #8
she used reverse warp tense snooper2 Dec 2014 #21
Yes this needs a body language expert on it too MyNameGoesHere Dec 2014 #58
I believe it was a pluperfect subjunctive participle... TreasonousBastard Dec 2014 #158
It is about money and keeping the base excited duriing difficult times. NCTraveler Dec 2014 #14
I have concluded that Elizabeth Warren is not running for president. NBachers Dec 2014 #15
Well I'm sure this makes the Corporate Queen's followers happy. n/t benz380 Dec 2014 #16
Name calling not cool.. riversedge Dec 2014 #20
btw---I would love riversedge Dec 2014 #24
^^^this^^^ L0oniX Dec 2014 #25
Sounds like it from their nasty gloating. nt Union Scribe Dec 2014 #40
Welcome to DU... SidDithers Dec 2014 #43
This is like high school. treestar Dec 2014 #52
Well ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2014 #61
DU 2014 /nt Ash_F Dec 2014 #110
DU high school, sounds like a Broadway play that could be turned in to a reality tv show!! Major Hogwash Dec 2014 #192
I believe her. Bernie Sanders 2016!!! nt Zorra Dec 2014 #22
She's not running, Bernie says he will! Bernie all the way! Autumn Dec 2014 #26
Absolutely! HappyMe Dec 2014 #27
There is no doubt that Bernie is very serious about running. Hopefully, he will run as a Democrat, still_one Dec 2014 #34
If he runs as Ind I'll bet he gets a lot of Rep votes. L0oniX Dec 2014 #99
Nope, I don't agree still_one Dec 2014 #105
Yeah, most Republican voters are not gonna vote for Bernie Sanders YoungDemCA Dec 2014 #180
How did they treat Romney as a Morman aspirant Dec 2014 #201
Go Bernie! MissDeeds Dec 2014 #48
I did not see your post, but I agree totally! Mass Dec 2014 #67
If and when Hillary Clinton announces, I expect MineralMan Dec 2014 #29
Bill & Hillary have cashed in on Wallstreet banks so that would be very sad..... think Dec 2014 #80
Nevertheless, Warren will strongly endorse Hillary. MineralMan Dec 2014 #83
Wallstreet power trumps American democracy. I get that /nt think Dec 2014 #86
Economic policy trumps most thing, frankly. MineralMan Dec 2014 #88
So Citibank selling derivatives using funds backed by US taxpayers is sound economic policy? think Dec 2014 #97
Yes, according to Hillary and her banking buddies. I accept she's a Wall Street corporatist through and through. Just sad. InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2014 #188
It is sad. It's disgusting. AngryOldDem Dec 2014 #198
Yes! Get with the program! AngryOldDem Dec 2014 #197
If Bernie runs as a Dem, and she endorses Hillary, she will lose all her cred Zorra Dec 2014 #114
Perhaps, if that concerns her at all. MineralMan Dec 2014 #115
It is quite amazing how many people here really want to see something that isn't. I have tried to still_one Dec 2014 #31
I agree. Very amazing. Fantasy beats reality, I suppose. FSogol Dec 2014 #94
Why is it she is doing great things in the senate? aspirant Dec 2014 #203
Senate majority leader would also be an aspiring position. joshcryer Dec 2014 #210
Being President is overrated anyway BeyondGeography Dec 2014 #36
Never say never madokie Dec 2014 #49
If she continues to endorse Hillary RedCappedBandit Dec 2014 #54
Not an exclamation point. A "never" on the end. magical thyme Dec 2014 #56
She isn't running at this time. But I do believe she is testing the waters. Tatiana Dec 2014 #64
People cannot take NO for an answer. I have read people commenting on this interview by Mass Dec 2014 #65
The thought of Hillary being the POTUS is very painful for a hell of a lot of Democrats. L0oniX Dec 2014 #85
Yes, I agree, so why support somebody who is not running why an excellent progressive has signaled Mass Dec 2014 #87
I'm fine with her not running. No matter who runs or what direction they try to take Voice for Peace Dec 2014 #68
I am on the Bernie team, but would love to see Warren on the ticket, too. djean111 Dec 2014 #79
I suppose it would be rude to say "I told you so"..... brooklynite Dec 2014 #81
I'm sure you will gloat with the Queen at your next salon meeting. benz380 Dec 2014 #106
Or maybe I'll chuckle with Elizabeth Warren at our next lunch... brooklynite Dec 2014 #118
JEEEzus. Make a Sherman statement or don't. To hell with exclamation points. n/t yodermon Dec 2014 #82
...because how a bunch of bloggers interpret her remarks is the most important thing to her. brooklynite Dec 2014 #119
If Warren is not running then find someone else bl968 Dec 2014 #89
Let's be honest: if Warren said: "I WILL NOT RUN in the future"....... brooklynite Dec 2014 #93
I kind of doubt she'll run - TBF Dec 2014 #98
This is becoming the "Dead Parrot" sketch Yavin4 Dec 2014 #101
Exactly. The depths of denial on display are breath-taking. I rofl'ed. FSogol Dec 2014 #104
+1 nt steve2470 Dec 2014 #160
"No" means "yes"!!!! zappaman Dec 2014 #108
Isn't it odd that every single conservadem on this site is ecstatic that Liz probably won't run? LondonReign2 Dec 2014 #111
Here you go. FSogol Dec 2014 #112
Really? Point to one... brooklynite Dec 2014 #120
It oozes from all your pores LondonReign2 Dec 2014 #124
In other words, you can't find an example... brooklynite Dec 2014 #131
Who is ecstatic? Stating currently known facts doesn't equal ecstasy. phleshdef Dec 2014 #122
If only we had a way to understand what "I will not run" meant. FSogol Dec 2014 #123
If only we had saved our Malt-O-Meal magic decoder rings, dammit! Major Hogwash Dec 2014 #194
Yep Union Scribe Dec 2014 #136
She's playing the long game... Javaman Dec 2014 #121
She'll be 71 in 2020 - TBF Dec 2014 #125
Exactly. Age matters, its pretty much now/never. Luckily, she's never said she isn't going to run. RiverLover Dec 2014 #128
Too bad. I'm still not voting for Hillary. vi5 Dec 2014 #126
Then it would mean that you are making a decision that is and should remain political into Cal33 Dec 2014 #142
Not personal. vi5 Dec 2014 #147
I don't like her policies for exactly the same reasons. But I do think that Hillary's Cal33 Dec 2014 #149
If she lost to the repubs back then, how could she win now? aspirant Dec 2014 #205
I don't quite follow what you mean. In 1993 Hillary was not an employee of the government. She Cal33 Dec 2014 #211
So she took on repubs and lost with the support of the president aspirant Dec 2014 #213
Hillary isn't going to take away Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security, the Affordable Care Act, Cal33 Dec 2014 #214
If I don't vote for HRC, people will die. aspirant Dec 2014 #216
If you don't vote for HRC when she is running against a Republican for president, more people will Cal33 Dec 2014 #217
You can peddle this fear of death somewhere else aspirant Dec 2014 #218
Okay. I've done my best to explain, but your mind is made up. Cal33 Dec 2014 #219
then we're screwed Doctor_J Dec 2014 #127
... SidDithers Dec 2014 #132
"..Senator Warren has publicly announced she is not running for President in 2016.. " In a letter Cha Dec 2014 #137
Warren's lawyers: "not confuse donors about a non-existent run for President" FSogol Dec 2014 #138
Oh yeah, like Elizabeth doesn't want them to waste their hard earned MONEY! Nice person. But, Cha Dec 2014 #139
But how do you know she didn't have her fingers crossed? brooklynite Dec 2014 #148
I don't.. she sure is expending a lot of energy to make it as to "..not confuse donors about a non- Cha Dec 2014 #150
MAYBE she wonders why she keeps saying she's not running, and people keep saying she is? brooklynite Dec 2014 #154
If she changes her hairstyle suddenly, overnight, then we'll know for sure! Major Hogwash Dec 2014 #195
I think she needs to say this... steve2470 Dec 2014 #140
You can't see Warren's hands. Maybe her fingers are crossed! FSogol Dec 2014 #143
She hasn't signed an oath in blood yet....so....some won't believe it! VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #152
The election is.... 99Forever Dec 2014 #153
Hmm...what's she trying to tell us? brooklynite Dec 2014 #155
If there was only some way to tell what she meant. FSogol Dec 2014 #157
Thanks for pointing that out. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Dec 2014 #159
This message was self-deleted by its author INdemo Dec 2014 #162
What has O'Malley done that makes you think he is a "another Wall St hand me down"? FSogol Dec 2014 #171
Hillary is the worst. n/t PowerToThePeople Dec 2014 #164
Where in my post do I say anything about Hillary? FSogol Dec 2014 #169
Apparently, some people on DU think she's just another lying sack of shit politician baldguy Dec 2014 #167
What I want LWolf Dec 2014 #170
True. Even without running, she is probably pushing the Democrats to the left FSogol Dec 2014 #173
So whats the date when we can officially write her off? BootinUp Dec 2014 #175
I hope she's not the nominee for the following reasons YoungDemCA Dec 2014 #176
this is what candidates usually say Enrique Dec 2014 #183
It' also what non-candidates say when they're not running. brooklynite Dec 2014 #212
They just want her to declare first and get out of Clinton's way... Orsino Dec 2014 #199
So glad this thread popped up again - evidently it is "STFU because Liz said she is not running" day djean111 Dec 2014 #202
If she runs, she runs. If she doesn't, she doesn't. Rex Dec 2014 #215
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Warren on NPR: "I am...»Reply #86