Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Bernie Sanders: The solution: The major Wall Street banks must be broken up.... [View all]ozone_man
(4,825 posts)135. Don't forget that it was Clinton who signed the bill
to eliminate Glass-Steagall, so let's not blame the Republicans:
President Bill Clinton publicly declared "the GlassSteagall law is no longer appropriate."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass%E2%80%93Steagall_Legislation
Bernie Sanders is not saying much that is different than Paul Krugman was in 2009. Krugman has changed his tune now, though there was a time when he did not appear to be a lacky for this administration and Wall Street:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a4Tl65kFU96s
Feb. 2 (Bloomberg) -- President Barack Obama shouldnt hesitate to nationalize the banks that need to be bailed out, Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman said.
If taxpayers are footing the bill for rescuing the banks, why shouldnt they get ownership, at least until private buyers can be found? Krugman wrote in a column in the New York Times published today. But the Obama administration appears to be tying itself in knots to avoid this outcome.
His remarks echo those of Nassim Nicholas Taleb and Nouriel Roubini, who said last week that nationalizations will be necessary to bring the U.S. banking system out of insolvency. Obama will require banks to bolster lending in return for government aid, lawmaker Barney Frank said yesterday, stopping short of taking full ownership.
Krugman said the U.S. governments rescue plan appears to put banking risk with taxpayers when loans go bad while giving the rewards to executives and shareholders when things go well. He cited newspaper reports that Obamas rescue plan will include government purchases of troubled bank assets and guarantees against losses.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
150 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Bernie Sanders: The solution: The major Wall Street banks must be broken up.... [View all]
Playinghardball
Dec 2014
OP
We need them to be careful about how they vote too! Many Dem's voted to roll back Dodd-Frank law.
midnight
Dec 2014
#41
I hear you, but Chief Supreme Court Justice John Roberts said there was no quid pro quo.
Dustlawyer
Dec 2014
#112
Why yes! And he's the same purportedly well-educated Chief Justice who can't even get the
calimary
Dec 2014
#124
dems dont vote so if you want to stay in office and your party wont get out and vote
belzabubba333
Dec 2014
#63
yes it's the people's fault for not voting - your excuses for not voting are lame
belzabubba333
Dec 2014
#96
not a lie- in 2010; 235,809,266 was the voting-age population voter turnout 90,682,968 thats
belzabubba333
Dec 2014
#138
He totally did do this when Dems were in control. "The Nation", Thursday, November 12, 2009:
Zorra
Dec 2014
#5
Thanks for reminding our deep-pocketed, salon-going friend of that. (n/t)
WorseBeforeBetter
Dec 2014
#29
I will never go that route again, the lesser of two evils is still evil and I'm done with it.
Autumn
Dec 2014
#71
No it's not. If a party can't get a citizen to vote for them that is the fault of the party
Autumn
Dec 2014
#92
Plus +1000 No more Republican Infiltrators..whoops sorry, I mean noble 3rd way Democrats
Katashi_itto
Dec 2014
#117
and then promptly loose the white house and therefore supreme court picks
belzabubba333
Dec 2014
#49
would love bernie to run but you cant count on dems to vote - it's not the system
belzabubba333
Dec 2014
#53
What guarantee the 3rd way "Democrat" (Lol) would even give us a decent SCOTUS pick?
Katashi_itto
Dec 2014
#118
I went to the DMV on the 12. After over 40 years as a Democrat I am no longer one.
Autumn
Dec 2014
#56
The only reason I registered Dem was so I could vote in state/district races but the Dem candidates
L0oniX
Dec 2014
#60
Or he could use a veto pen. But at least Bernie HAS pushed legislation to do just that in 2009
Autumn
Dec 2014
#13
Didn't Bernie just get promoted to Chairman of the Buget Committee? His brains and his words
appalachiablue
Dec 2014
#111
Thanks. He must have proposed his bill as an amendment to a bill in the Budget Committee
onenote
Dec 2014
#97
^^That^^, in a nutshell, is the perfect illustration of why Democratic Centrists have
Zorra
Dec 2014
#137
Maybe if those in our executive branch were less interested in cultivating favor with very
JDPriestly
Dec 2014
#31
The TARP rollout was terrible, Hank Paulson started the rollout and apparently allowed
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#8
Yep ...so much for letting the free market capitalism decide who lives and dies.
L0oniX
Dec 2014
#61
Sounds good, but is there anyone in the Democratic Party leading that effort?
ozone_man
Dec 2014
#150
The next bailout is already being planned and they are flipping us off while they do it.
L0oniX
Dec 2014
#50
And it isn't just the banks. We need legislation that prevents our country from being
JDPriestly
Dec 2014
#30
While getting something like this may be hard with all the rethugs ruling, if a there is a crash it
jwirr
Dec 2014
#39
You're either with Sanders and Warren or you are with the enemy of the common people.
L0oniX
Dec 2014
#48
Is Bernie sending mixed signals on the banking industry, he attends a meeting with lobbyists
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#82
You may not but I bet he took it seriously since he and others attended.
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#132
Maybe you want to call it dumb, think I will correspond with Bernie and tell him how dumb
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#134
Not counting bills to name a post office, Bernie has introduced exactly one bill that became law
onenote
Dec 2014
#143
LOTS of industries need to be broken up. Wall Street is at or near the top though. nt
stillwaiting
Dec 2014
#104
Oh I agree the biggest 10 banks should be broken up its not going to happen any time
cstanleytech
Dec 2014
#116
I'm sure that proposal will first on Hillary's "To Do" list. Won't it?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2014
#128