Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Stars adoption of black children was little more than a fashion accessory" [View all]A-Schwarzenegger
(15,821 posts)2. A counter-view to the original 1971 NABSW claim:
Last edited Tue Dec 16, 2014, 12:01 AM - Edit history (1)
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/1994-09-14/news/9409130503_1_adoption-foster-care-trans-racialFor more than 20 years, black children in foster care have been held hostage to ideology. Adoptions of black children by white couples have been severely curtailed since the National Association of Black Social Workers blasted the practice as ''racial and cultural genocide'' in 1971.
The social workers organization charged that white parents could not raise black children to cope with a racist society, and that children were being cut off from their heritage. Better to stay in foster care or in institutions than to be so alienated, went the theory, which became policy in most states.
Since then, studies have shown that trans-racial adoption does not produce emotionally crippled, racially confused adults who fit nowhere. A 20-year study found that trans-racial adoptees (almost all adopted as infants) were as healthy, well-adjusted and close to their adoptive parents as their white siblings, who were the parents' children by birth.
...
''The greatest fear was that they'd grow up to be Oreos, black on the outside and white on the inside,'' says researcher Rita Simon, professor of public affairs and law at The American University. ''That's all garbage. The black kids are the first to say: 'We know what we are. We can look in the mirror.' ''
more
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
"Stars adoption of black children was little more than a fashion accessory" [View all]
Jesus Malverde
Dec 2014
OP
Ah, so if she had happened to adopt him it would have been "cultural genocide",
Nye Bevan
Dec 2014
#31
No, it's not. And attempting to use the word genocide in relation to this is offensive. nt
stevenleser
Dec 2014
#26
Thank you - I knew that this study existed but did not have a link. In 1971 when the first article
jwirr
Dec 2014
#8
Clearly, they weren't capable of teaching their children to copa with a racist society.
hughee99
Dec 2014
#9
Bullshite.. Amy Pascal has already shown herself to be a racist in earlier hacked emails.. and you
Cha
Dec 2014
#12
Amy P is shallow, racist, and cynical to the core. Parenthood by whatever means can turn out...
Hekate
Dec 2014
#20
They were just awful when they thought no one else would ever in a million years read
Cha
Dec 2014
#36
You might have a point if most stars adopted children in the united states.
Jesus Malverde
Dec 2014
#42
And what is your data on where 'most stars' adopt? Got any? Of course not.
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2014
#48