Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Smoking Gun: Wilson grand jury Witness #40-a liar & convicted felon was "Nowhere Near Canfield Dr" [View all]logosoco
(3,211 posts)18. That thread led me to reading that part of the transcript right away!
It was very hard to follow, I don't know how the jurors gave her testimony any weight at all. Sounds to me like she needs to be visited by the FBI again.
After reading more of the transcripts and hearing anyone commenting on how wilson was "being attacked" I want to just shout at them and say "You didn't read the transcripts!" or they have very bad reading comprehension!
I don't know legally how to bring this back to the grand jury, but it needs to be done! This is a travesty of justice and cannot stand.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Smoking Gun: Wilson grand jury Witness #40-a liar & convicted felon was "Nowhere Near Canfield Dr" [View all]
kpete
Dec 2014
OP
A lying bipolar who seeks public attention is all the FPD could come up with as a witness.
Dont call me Shirley
Dec 2014
#5
FYI: I started a thread about the infamous Witness #40 back on Dec 2. Not sure
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#6
No double jeopardy attaches to Grand Jury proceedings and there is no statute
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#20
The Grand Jury system was originally started in England and they abolished it in 1930 because it
jwirr
Dec 2014
#21
The police are no longer a police force - they are a military force let loose on the American public
jwirr
Dec 2014
#22
even a military force is not supposed to randomly murder - this is far worse, it is like a criminal
hollysmom
Dec 2014
#29
The real issue and bottom line is that the prosecutor should never have taken thise wittnesses
sammy750
Dec 2014
#30
That pretty much requires that that GJ decision must be overturned and a new Federal
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#31
She was presented as someone who witnessed the crime. That + her obvious racism should have
bettyellen
Dec 2014
#61