Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(26,549 posts)

10. There's no restrictions on seating a new grand jury.

Tue Dec 16, 2014, 08:26 PM

Dec 2014

A prosecutor could seat a new grand jury at any time.

Double jeopardy doesn't apply to grand juries, only trials.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Gawker: key witness for Wilson made whole story up [View all] Takket Dec 2014 OP

This was on MSNBC a couple weeks ago Mass Dec 2014 #1

This seems to be a more complete account of the witness, though starroute Dec 2014 #4

Yikes wc89 Dec 2014 #2

I have been saying this since the GJ docs were released Kelvin Mace Dec 2014 #3

I am sure Kelvin Mace Dec 2014 #17

K & R !!! WillyT Dec 2014 #5

Would this not be evidence that so then did Wilson? WinkyDink Dec 2014 #6

That would be the right thing to do rock Dec 2014 #8

Why England got rid of Grand Juries liberal from boston Dec 2014 #9

There's no restrictions on seating a new grand jury. jeff47 Dec 2014 #10

The prosecutor needs prosecuting. SleeplessinSoCal Dec 2014 #11

+1000 what a JOKE he is noiretextatique Dec 2014 #14

Hear, hear! - nt KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #16

This message was self-deleted by its author winterwar Dec 2014 #12

Isn't that perjury? KamaAina Dec 2014 #13

this needs traction everywhere. spanone Dec 2014 #18