Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Capitulation Is Not Compromise - 'Obama legacy will be viewed as one of sheer ineptitude' [View all]... he'll get to join the Clintons and the Bushes in $250K per speech appearances and all kinds of lavishly paid "consultancies" and such but only if he plays ball with the bankers.
So he plays ball. His personal fortune is more important than the bottom 20% of Americans being able to kep a roof over their head and food on the table.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
93 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Capitulation Is Not Compromise - 'Obama legacy will be viewed as one of sheer ineptitude' [View all]
Ykcutnek
Dec 2014
OP
people may have been correct when they said he was too "green" for the job
belzabubba333
Dec 2014
#1
So the solution would be not to vote for Obama for a third term? All righty then.....
Fred Sanders
Dec 2014
#3
A government shut down and default would have been wiser. Just wait, the GOP will do it in 2016.
freshwest
Dec 2014
#66
I get the feeling that you are ok with the status quo. Always with the clever(?) comments while
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#67
I know for certain that you are not sure what I am sure about.....you got a problem with clever?
Fred Sanders
Dec 2014
#78
You are right of course. I don't know what you are about because you cleverly don't
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#80
Hillary's supporters have been proven right that Obama was untested, too inexperienced for the job
AZ Progressive
Dec 2014
#5
Teddy Roosevelt had a history of being a fighter and FDR's hero was Teddy
AZ Progressive
Dec 2014
#6
If you consider criticising the President for supporting a bill that cuts pensions, Pell grants,
liberal_at_heart
Dec 2014
#21
I won't blast you like the other respondents but I would be interested in seeing your
Nuclear Unicorn
Dec 2014
#29
You must excuse those here that were hoping for change. After 2000 they thought that
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#68
50% of Americans think torture is OK too. Argumentum ad populum is a logical fallacy and
stevenleser
Dec 2014
#40
No, it won't. History is always good to leaders who lead out of economic malaise. Nt
stevenleser
Dec 2014
#93
Ignore ' the ready for Hillary clan', they 're still pissed off that Hillary didn't win.
Stellar
Dec 2014
#59
The writter assumes Obama didn't want to help Wall Street and the future
helpmetohelpyou
Dec 2014
#17
I read it. It notes the center of the controversy is the preception the President capitulated.
Nuclear Unicorn
Dec 2014
#35
Once again, you ruined a good bashfest with detailed questions supported by facts
BeyondGeography
Dec 2014
#77
The argument presumes the certainty of the Dodd-Frank roll-back will be superceded by
Nuclear Unicorn
Dec 2014
#82
No it won't.. just because some hack(Lance Simmens) writes it on huffpo and someone
Cha
Dec 2014
#64