Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why are some people so eager to kill the idea Warren might run? [View all]Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Uh wrong...I happen to know for a fact WOMEN who normally vote Republican are considering
VanillaRhapsody
Dec 2014
#68
Semantics - most Democrats do support her - but I suspect many Democrats would prefer
NRaleighLiberal
Dec 2014
#5
You clearly can't read. I was referring to my friends and family. Keep trying, though.
NRaleighLiberal
Dec 2014
#82
You'll see. I guarantee you that come Jan. 2016 her lead will be nowhere near that.
morningfog
Dec 2014
#77
That article does not contradict what I said. Nor was it written by Nate Silver.
morningfog
Dec 2014
#80
You are the one suggesting that Clinton will waltz into the primary with a 55 point lead.
morningfog
Dec 2014
#83
One could also ask why some people are so eager to claim she will run.
TreasonousBastard
Dec 2014
#2
There has to be more than 20+ years of name-recognition, which is why she's popular now
arcane1
Dec 2014
#29
And that is a big deal. Governing means convincing the legislative branch to pass your agenda
stevenleser
Dec 2014
#26
i don't support Hillary, i lean more Biden or Sanders, but i think because it's just not backed up
JI7
Dec 2014
#16
Show me where Hillary supporters are trying to kill the idea of her running.
William769
Dec 2014
#23
It's not about Hillary or Liz the way I see it. It is a stifling of an uncomfortable discussion.
Autumn
Dec 2014
#24
Opposites? They are both rated the same on the chart, this opposite of the same would not be
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#28
Um, yeah, about that talking point? They have less in common than you think
Electric Monk
Dec 2014
#40
Here is a link to Hillary and Elizabeth on the issues, go to the end of the links and you
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#46
Warren has never been cagey. Everytime she has been asked she has firmly stated she is not running.
Agnosticsherbet
Dec 2014
#27
Hillary is ready for the primary, any candidate who wants to throw their hat in the ring
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#30
Few are more eager to kill the idea that Warren might run, than Warren herself.
misterhighwasted
Dec 2014
#32
I'm not trying to kill anything!! I actually believe Elizabeth Warren on the subject. nt
msanthrope
Dec 2014
#38
Because Hillary Clinton has never won a seriously contested race and is unlikely to pull it off
TheKentuckian
Dec 2014
#53
That doesn't mean it was brutal or even a serious contest. In fact two is often easier than one.
TheKentuckian
Dec 2014
#99
It would be "cathartic" for a segment of America's left. It would be "grating and alienating"
Recursion
Dec 2014
#79
The short answer is "1984". The longer answer is "1988, 1984, 1980, 1972, 1968."
Recursion
Dec 2014
#72
Ms Warren offered to "put an exclamation point" on her denial. Why don't you believer her?
mulsh
Dec 2014
#86
She "offered" to put an exclamation point on her denial, BUT SHE DIDN'T DO IT, see?
brooklynite
Dec 2014
#90