Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pampango

(24,692 posts)
15. Manufacturing jobs have been declining since the 1960's in the US and since the 1970's in every
Wed Dec 17, 2014, 09:37 PM
Dec 2014

other developed country. Since the 1960's the only period of increase in manufacturing employment was during the Clinton administration after NAFTA. They had declined steadily for 30 years before Clinton and for 10 years afterwards, just increasing again starting in 2011. To blame a 50-year decline on NAFTA seems to be searching for a boogeyman.

FDR actually proposed an International Trading Organization (ITO) in 1944 (along with the IMF and World Bank) but by the time negotiations were completed republicans controlled congress and would not ratify US participation in the ITO so it died. Who knows if the ITO would have become a reality if FDR had not died in office.

GATT was what created in the FDR/Truman era to promote multilateral control of trade. It was meant to be temporary until the ITO came into force but became permanent when the ITO was rejected by republicans. FDR did not want to see a return to the high tariffs and limited trade of the republican administrations that preceded him. Truman shared his commitment.

FDR created a strong economy and middle class not by going after foreigners and trading with them, but by going after our own 1%. He raised taxes on them, empowered unions, created and strengthened the safety net and regulated the way that banks and corporations did business. He did not blame other countries for our problems. In fact, he increased trade soon after taking office then set up the beginnings of the international trading system that exists today.

Truthfully, I doubt we'd be much better off had NAFTA not been enacted. Hoyt Dec 2014 #1
It is a symptom not the cause of our economic issues. former9thward Dec 2014 #2
NAFTA was the beginning of millions of jobs being exported. Add it's effects to GATT/WTO, Elwood P Dowd Dec 2014 #3
Do you have a link supporting your claims that NAFTA cost millions of jobs? Hoyt Dec 2014 #8
I posted that NAFTA was just the beginning of millions of lost jobs. Elwood P Dowd Dec 2014 #9
Outsourcing would have happened without NAFTA, but I don't think Hoyt Dec 2014 #10
Bullshit & talking points right out of the republican playbook. Elwood P Dowd Dec 2014 #11
Maybe our standard of living got ahead of itself. Hoyt Dec 2014 #18
Manufacturing jobs have been declining since the 1960's in the US and since the 1970's in every pampango Dec 2014 #15
Nobody wants to hear the truth. Good post. Hoyt Dec 2014 #19
No, NAFTA was pretty much in the middle of millions of jobs being exported Recursion Dec 2014 #20
Truthfully, you're a TPP defender Union Scribe Dec 2014 #4
Not a defender, but like Krugman, not freaking out. Hoyt Dec 2014 #6
Huh? NAFTA destroyed us. JaneyVee Dec 2014 #5
No it did not. Hoyt Dec 2014 #7
stick to gun threads Union Scribe Dec 2014 #14
No. Wages went up. Recursion Dec 2014 #21
Free trade is bullshit libertarian/GOP love for money only. Rex Dec 2014 #12
I'm in Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #13
Done. lonestarnot Dec 2014 #16
Bill Clinton was president 21 years ago. n/t cloudbase Dec 2014 #17
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»21 years ago tomorrow Bus...»Reply #15