Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Congress passes major change to law on union pensions [View all]

House Education and Workforce Committee chair John Kline (R-Minn.) explains the pension proposal he cosponsored with Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.)
http://nwlaborpress.org/2014/12/congress-passes-major-change-law-union-pensions/
Dec 16, 2014
By DON McINTOSH, Associate Editor
Severely underfunded union pension plans will be allowed to reduce current retiree benefits in order to avoid future insolvency, under a last-minute amendment attached to the $1.1 trillion federal government appropriations bill known as the CRomnibus.
The amendment was sponsored by an unlikely duo: anti-union House Education and Workforce Committee chair John Kline (R-Minn.), and pro-union former committee chair George Miller (D-Calif.), who was serving out his final days of office after 20 years. The 161-page amendment came under the unwieldy name of Amendment 1 to H Res 776 (which itself governed consideration of HR 83). The proposal had support from a number of unions, and opposition from others. It was drawn up by committee staff based for the most part on Solutions, Not Bailouts a proposal introduced last year by the National Coordinating Committee for Multiemployer Plans (NCCMP), a group representing union benefit plans.
Amendment 1 covers multi-employer pension plans plans that unions jointly sponsor with employer groups, overseen 50-50 by trustees appointed by the union and employers. Employers contribute under the terms of collective bargaining agreements, and the funds are invested so that the plans have enough to pay guaranteed monthly benefits when employees retire. All told, about 10 million people are in multi-employer plans, which are common in unionized construction, trucking, grocery, and service industries. Theyre much easier for small employers to join up, and theyre much more stable than single-employer pensions, which fail when the single company fails. But today, many multi-employer plans are in crisis, thanks to stock market downturns and declining employment in union industries. Like single employer pension plans, multi-employer pensions are insured through the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, but PBGC pays out only a fraction of promised benefits when a plan runs out of money, and PBGC is itself in danger of insolvency.
Amendment 1 would shore up PBGC finances by doubling the per-participant premium paid by multi-employer pension plans to $26 per person per year.
FULL story at link.
44 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anytime a bunch of white men in suits get together to "fix" union pensions..
mountain grammy
Dec 2014
#3
Yikes. What does this sentence mean? "the funds are invested so that the plans have enough
midnight
Dec 2014
#4
I guess I can't tell if this is a necessary action or one that is undermining the pension system
mythology
Dec 2014
#10
Pitchforks should be coming out very soon...apologists for wall street stealing our pensions
NoJusticeNoPeace
Dec 2014
#26