Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Omaha Steve

(109,707 posts)
Thu Dec 18, 2014, 09:50 AM Dec 2014

Congress passes major change to law on union pensions [View all]



House Education and Workforce Committee chair John Kline (R-Minn.) explains the pension proposal he cosponsored with Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.)

http://nwlaborpress.org/2014/12/congress-passes-major-change-law-union-pensions/

Dec 16, 2014

By DON McINTOSH, Associate Editor

Severely underfunded union pension plans will be allowed to reduce current retiree benefits in order to avoid future insolvency, under a last-minute amendment attached to the $1.1 trillion federal government appropriations bill known as the “CRomnibus.”

The amendment was sponsored by an unlikely duo: anti-union House Education and Workforce Committee chair John Kline (R-Minn.), and pro-union former committee chair George Miller (D-Calif.), who was serving out his final days of office after 20 years. The 161-page amendment came under the unwieldy name of Amendment 1 to H Res 776 (which itself governed consideration of HR 83). The proposal had support from a number of unions, and opposition from others. It was drawn up by committee staff based for the most part on “Solutions, Not Bailouts” — a proposal introduced last year by the National Coordinating Committee for Multiemployer Plans (NCCMP), a group representing union benefit plans.

Amendment 1 covers multi-employer pension plans — plans that unions jointly sponsor with employer groups, overseen 50-50 by trustees appointed by the union and employers. Employers contribute under the terms of collective bargaining agreements, and the funds are invested so that the plans have enough to pay guaranteed monthly benefits when employees retire. All told, about 10 million people are in multi-employer plans, which are common in unionized construction, trucking, grocery, and service industries. They’re much easier for small employers to join up, and they’re much more stable than single-employer pensions, which fail when the single company fails. But today, many multi-employer plans are in crisis, thanks to stock market downturns and declining employment in union industries. Like single employer pension plans, multi-employer pensions are insured through the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, but PBGC pays out only a fraction of promised benefits when a plan runs out of money, and PBGC is itself in danger of insolvency.

Amendment 1 would shore up PBGC finances by doubling the per-participant premium paid by multi-employer pension plans to $26 per person per year.



FULL story at link.

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
unding everything one layer at a time belzabubba333 Dec 2014 #1
shame on George Miller -- is he lining up his next gig after he retires? nt antigop Dec 2014 #2
Anytime a bunch of white men in suits get together to "fix" union pensions.. mountain grammy Dec 2014 #3
Yikes. What does this sentence mean? "the funds are invested so that the plans have enough midnight Dec 2014 #4
No, the unions invest the money. former9thward Dec 2014 #13
"Wallstreet" isn't a thing. The unions invest the funds. Recursion Dec 2014 #30
So Wallstreet ripped off union pensions.... blackspade Dec 2014 #5
How did "Wallstreet" rip them off? former9thward Dec 2014 #14
The money was invested in Wall Street. blackspade Dec 2014 #36
Who invested the money in Wall Street? former9thward Dec 2014 #38
Um, the trustees? blackspade Dec 2014 #39
'there is a wealth of info out there detailing this stuff" A HERETIC I AM Dec 2014 #40
Care to clarify what I'm not understanding? blackspade Dec 2014 #41
Sure. A HERETIC I AM Dec 2014 #42
That clarified nothing. blackspade Dec 2014 #43
I made all that back, plus 50% joeglow3 Dec 2014 #44
See, the thing is, PEOPLE are not "too big to fail." WinkyDink Dec 2014 #6
big kick and big rec! nt steve2470 Dec 2014 #7
K&R! countryjake Dec 2014 #8
K&R WorseBeforeBetter Dec 2014 #9
I guess I can't tell if this is a necessary action or one that is undermining the pension system mythology Dec 2014 #10
We have several DUers I can't speak for about this Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #12
Pitchforks should be coming out very soon...apologists for wall street stealing our pensions NoJusticeNoPeace Dec 2014 #26
These were not company run pension funds. former9thward Dec 2014 #16
Link please Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #17
It is in your OP. former9thward Dec 2014 #18
Here is a little bit different take written before the budget passed Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #20
Well I agree with the Carpenters. former9thward Dec 2014 #21
But the PBGC isn't just multiple employer pensions Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #22
Right, they are both. former9thward Dec 2014 #24
I think we are back in agrement Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #25
I worked at Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel for 40 years. Part of my pension a doc03 Dec 2014 #28
I read so much in a week, here is more from THE SAME LINK Omaha Steve Dec 2014 #23
You seem to be hellbent on blaming the unions. Maybe not all but doc03 Dec 2014 #32
No one can deny plain history. former9thward Dec 2014 #33
Goes back to Reaganomics. The Republicans are now raising hell about doc03 Dec 2014 #34
If you remember being in Washington asking Bush to put tariffs on steel you should also doc03 Dec 2014 #37
Kick nt Hissyspit Dec 2014 #11
fucking criminal. spanone Dec 2014 #15
Austerity for all and to all, good luck. nc4bo Dec 2014 #19
Obama WillTwain Dec 2014 #27
I agree and you can bet the Republicans are going to hang doc03 Dec 2014 #29
So did many unions (nt) Recursion Dec 2014 #31
k&r nt bananas Dec 2014 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Congress passes major cha...