Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)The Unidentified Queen of Torture [View all]
http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/unidentified-queen-tortureFor the past eight months, there has been a furious battle raging behind closed doors at the White House, the C.I.A., and in Congress. The question has been whether the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence would be allowed to use pseudonyms as a means of identifying characters in the devastating report it released last week on the C.I.A.s abusive interrogation and detention program. Ultimately, the committee was not allowed to, and now we know one reason why.
The NBC News investigative reporter Matthew Cole has pieced together a remarkable story revealing that a single senior officer, who is still in a position of high authority over counterterrorism at the C.I.A.a woman who he does not nameappears to have been a source of years worth of terrible judgment, with tragic consequences for the United States. Her story runs through the entire report. She dropped the ball when the C.I.A. was given information that might very well have prevented the 9/11 attacks; she gleefully participated in torture sessions afterward; she misinterpreted intelligence in such a way that it sent the C.I.A. on an absurd chase for Al Qaeda sleeper cells in Montana. And then she falsely told congressional overseers that the torture worked.
Had the Senate Intelligence Committee been permitted to use pseudonyms for the central characters in its report, as all previous congressional studies of intelligence failures, including the widely heralded Church Committee report in 1975, have done, it might not have taken a painstaking, and still somewhat cryptic, investigation after the fact in order for the American public to hold this senior official accountable. Many people who have worked with her over the years expressed shock to NBC that she has been entrusted with so much power. A former intelligence officer who worked directly with her is quoted by NBC, on background, as saying that she bears so much responsibility for so many intelligence failures that she should be put on trial and put in jail for what she has done.
Instead, however, she has been promoted to the rank of a general in the military, most recently working as the head of the C.I.A.s global-jihad unit. In that perch, she oversees the targeting of terror suspects around the world. (She was also, in part, the model for the lead character in Zero Dark Thirty.)
(end snip)
See also:
http://boingboing.net/2014/12/18/354250.html
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/investigations/bin-laden-expert-accused-shaping-cia-deception-torture-program-n269551
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Agreed. Blame a woman---and then say it is Hillary's fault, no woman can be trusted blah, blah.
McCamy Taylor
Dec 2014
#5
Doesn't it go like this...first deflect, then protect, then cough up a sacrifice
HereSince1628
Dec 2014
#6
NOT a military general. Original NBC story says she was promoted to the equivalent of that rank in
hedda_foil
Dec 2014
#32
"the GW Bush White House ordered a veritable stand down...." You're almost there, 90% Jimmy. Come
WinkyDink
Dec 2014
#17
on 9/11 I was working at one of the most respected international daily television news programs
librechik
Dec 2014
#29
When that guy on CNN came running down the steps in 2000 with the ruling on Bush V Gore....
Spitfire of ATJ
Dec 2014
#58
I discovered HST in high school, laughed my rear off reading F&LiLV, and loved him ever since. You
WinkyDink
Dec 2014
#54
A Neo-Conservative crony? Acting in coordination w/Cheney re: 9/11 hijakers? (speculation)
KittyWampus
Dec 2014
#19
Maybe it wasn't a failure, that the CIA 'failed' to share that information. Remember
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#28
the second 'Doctor'? there were not to many who 'participated' in torture sessions
Sunlei
Dec 2014
#25
LOL. That's epic. Thanks for the laugh (hope you kept your position :) - nt
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#49