Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The progressive issue many progressives don't seem to like [View all]jeff47
(26,549 posts)49. They don't anymore
They used to buy treasuries as you describe.
The problem they ran into is it requires exponential growth in the amount of treasuries you buy, and it just became too much money.
Why are they doing this? I have no idea
China's economy is based on selling us cheap crap. The problem is that improved China's economy and hurt ours.
In a world without government intervention, the Yuan would go up relative to the Dollar. That would make their cheap crap no longer cheap - and so we'd stop buying it. Their political stability is based on about 3-6% economic growth every year. So this would not be a small problem for China - the peasants, no matter what country, get upity when they're starving.
So they bought treasuries to inflate the Dollar relative to the Yuan. The problem is this can't go on forever. They're trying to make a river flow uphill, and the more water you put at the top of the hill, the bigger the bucket you need to use to move the water.
So they gave up. They've been trying to play games with currency pegs, but that isn't as effective and far more problematic in international politics. The result? Business magazines talking about "re-shoring" jobs back to the US....and others looking for the next country with cheap labor that could be exploited.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
105 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Keynesian policy is failing precisely because the US does not manufacture anymore.
Selatius
Apr 2012
#63
That balance sheet recession wouldn't have happened if people didn't borrow excessively.
Selatius
Apr 2012
#95
So you do think it is feasible to cut a person's food stamps benefits when the economy
dkf
Apr 2012
#65
No, you cut a person's food stamps when they, as an individual, no longer need them.
Scuba
Apr 2012
#66
I agree with you but the inflation must be natural, controlled inflation and not
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#2
No it isn't. What you call QE is just bond buying. That bond sits on the Fed's balance
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#68
High inflation erodes buying power faster than higher yields can compensate for it.
badtoworse
Apr 2012
#12
It Makes Debtors Pay In Currency Worth More Than That They Borrowed, Sir
The Magistrate
Apr 2012
#21
I believe that's why America inflated its way out of its debt right after World War II.
Zalatix
Apr 2012
#61
No Idea What You Mean, By Now, Sir, And No Reason Even To Think You Know, Either
The Magistrate
Apr 2012
#93
I mostly agree with you but also agree with badtoworse.Retirees would suffer horribly with inflation
stevenleser
Apr 2012
#7
If Social Security C.O.L. A. Were Adjusted Honestly, Sir, This Would Be Minimized
The Magistrate
Apr 2012
#10
"With one exception... the issue that matters the most. The Macro-Economy..."
unkachuck
Apr 2012
#40
Theoretically, China could have bid 'em up to the point where no one else was buying. (nt)
jeff47
Apr 2012
#86
It would take a radical restructuring of society at this point to change that trend..
Fumesucker
Apr 2012
#67
Congrats on the best thread on inflation/deflation and the Fed I have seen
banned from Kos
Apr 2012
#90