General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Enough of the bs. Let's cut to the chase, shall we? [View all]saras
(6,670 posts)There was an INNOCENT - Trayvon Williams, who went to the store to get some junk food. No one has offered any kind of evidence whatsoever that anything else was even a reasonable interpretation.
There was a violent thug with a record, who accosted and murdered this innocent. These facts can't be changed by the trial. In the worst possible case (i.e.white racism trumps everything else), they will be set aside by the court.
What remains to be discovered are the exact details - in particular, how much police involvement there was.
So no, there's no question but that Zimmerman committed some sort of crime by shooting an innocent without justification, but there is still some small debate as to the nature of the crime.
Anyone who thinks Zimmerman, based on his past record, is a "decent guy" is someone that I would follow around MY neighborhood with a gun until they left.