"Head shots, head shots."

[Pholus]

64. I pretty much don't see the use in having non right wing RKBA types about.

Last edited Tue Dec 23, 2014, 03:45 PM - Edit history (2)

I mean, how would it have worked a couple years back to hear a few of you guys say: "Hey fellow gun enthusiasts can't you see that carrying a semiautomatic rifle into Chipotle really isn't responsible or safe. Can you please exercise some self restraint cause you really ain't looking too sane?"

Even the fricking NRA did that for like 30 seconds until they caved....and certainly I would expect liberal RKBA'ers to have slightly more moral fiber than the NRA.

But no! Complete and utter silence from you guys. So the "Gun Grabbers" do the heavy lifting and the issue ONCE AGAIN becomes media shorthanded into "Gun Grabbers" vs "RKBA" and common sense gets tossed to the curb because nobody can approach this from the idea that guns ARE a complicated issue that might require compromise.

So to your point: When the RW are the only ones vocally making interpretations on RKBA and owning the issue does it REALLY matter if non-RW RKBA types actually exist out there?

Nope. Not one bit. Because there is zero difference between "nonexistent" and "completely useless and spineless."