Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)Disabled Recipients of Social Security Fund Face Hefty Benefits Cut [View all]
This has been posted before, but a reminder can't hurt. I was going to post this as a reply in the current 401K post in GD. I decided to make it an OP on it's own.
http://www.nbcnews.com/business/economy/disabled-recipients-social-security-fund-face-hefty-benefits-cut-n127981
June 22
BY MARTHA C. WHITE
Congressional gridlock is threatening the already thin lifeline of Social Security benefits that nearly 9 million disabled American workers rely on to feed, clothe and shelter their families.
Known as SSDI, the trust fund is one of two administered by the Social Security Administration (the other is for senior citizens), and its reserves will run dry in late 2016, if lawmakers dont act sooner to shore them up. But the timing is poor; it falls in an election year and experts say it could become a target for political infighting as Americans gear up to go to the polls.
I think itll probably come down to the wire, said Mark Duggan, a professor of business economics and public policy at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
And thats what worries people like Erica Choy. The 45-year-old San Francisco resident is struggling to raise the youngest four of her five kids on about $2,100 a month, a combination of SSDI and SSI supplemental security insurance. Its a constant struggle for us, she said.
FULL story at link.
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Disabled Recipients of Social Security Fund Face Hefty Benefits Cut [View all]
Omaha Steve
Dec 2014
OP
this is bullshit...if we can bail out the banks, we can take care of the disabled. nt
antigop
Dec 2014
#1
The goverment made money on the bank bailout, it was a win win situation for the citizens
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#30
I did not address the lack of prosecution,off-shored tax profits, gutted regulations, excessive
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#44
You know the government came out well on the bank bailouts and are smart enough understand
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#46
If the government made money on this deal whose favor would you think it would be?
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#59
It is more than figuring out who purchased homes which was out of their price range from the start.
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#88
Propaganda? That would be by the denial of how much money went out and how much returned.
Thinkingabout
Dec 2014
#60
Silly! The ONLY reason Obama's socialist-marxist-nazi-commie dreams haven't come to pass...
Beartracks
Dec 2014
#15
The supposed 'fix' didn't fix a damn thing, it was just another scam. And you're misinformed;
NewDeal_Dem
Dec 2014
#19
Doubt they can either; but who's getting all the money, since GDP per capita is larger than
NewDeal_Dem
Dec 2014
#32
you midunderstood. Real (inflation adjusted) US GDP per capita is higher than ever before in
NewDeal_Dem
Dec 2014
#41
Raise the pay-in income threshold up to $500,000.00. That should fix the problem! Tax the rich.
Dont call me Shirley
Dec 2014
#52
Ask Bernie Sanders, he has the facts. Raising the cap will raise all the revenue needed.
Dont call me Shirley
Dec 2014
#53
Why is not raising the cap such a sacred cow? I don't recall ever hearing that Congress was
Stardust
Dec 2014
#55
It's a slight increase only appllied to the portion of income in excess of the cap at $118,500
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2014
#66
FWIW....when an SSDI recipient turns 65, they are switched to regular Soc. Sec. funds.
dixiegrrrrl
Dec 2014
#78
WTF? How can that be?? We gave the rich all the money so they could create jobs and save us all!
Beartracks
Dec 2014
#16
Indeed. You have to get a lawyer or you will be denied and then the lawyer gets some of the back pay
L0oniX
Dec 2014
#69
and you might see, if you study the matter, that a lot of the super-rich often have more than
NewDeal_Dem
Dec 2014
#21
The fix that will probably be agreed to is to redirect some FICA taxes from Social Security
PoliticAverse
Dec 2014
#51
Of course they could, but it doesn't seem likely the Republicans would agree to that. n/t
PoliticAverse
Dec 2014
#77
I am afraid it is all a house of cards SSI, SSDI, Medicare,SS and our pensions and nobody is doing
doc03
Dec 2014
#28
But they didn't say that about the money that bailed out the banking industry, did they?
NewDeal_Dem
Dec 2014
#36
Yeah. Where did that $15 billion in profit go? It sure as hell didn't go to shore up food stamps.
liberal_at_heart
Dec 2014
#45
All they have to do is say the right thing and then do the opposite when they get elected.
liberal_at_heart
Dec 2014
#42
That's right, I was responding to the post about SSI/SSDI recipients not being eligible
PoliticAverse
Dec 2014
#89