Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
1. "bourgeoisie landowner" is something of a contradiction in terms (and a grammatical
Thu Dec 25, 2014, 10:57 PM
Dec 2014
faux pas to boot). The 'bourgeoisie' own the means of production but this is not usually thought of as 'land' but rather industrial plants in urban or suburban centers; the bourgeoisie are usually contrasted with the 'proletariat' who, again, are urban workers toiling at industrial plants with only their labor to sell. Land-owners who did not have to work the land themselve but could live off their rents would be more properly called 'gentry' and those who worked the land 'peasants.'

The adjectival form of the word is 'bourgeois,' so it would be a 'bourgeois landowner' (and not a 'bourgeoisie landowner'). If Bill Gates owned a farm -- and I'm sure he owns more than one by now -- he would be a bourgeois landowner. He is also a member of the bourgeoisie and certainly not a proletarian.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How The American Bourgeoi...»Reply #1