General Discussion

Dr Hobbitstein

(6,568 posts)

18. A damn fine reason to vote for her.

Reply to ashling (Original post)

Fri Dec 26, 2014, 01:46 AM

Dec 2014

Pro science leaders are needed. Not gullible followers and peddlers of woo.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

78 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Hillary Clinton Goes to Bat for GMOs at Biotech Conference [View all] ashling Dec 2014 OP

Another reason to reject her as an candidate Just for Fun Dec 2014 #1

I sooo agree! newfie11 Dec 2014 #2

I do. 840high Dec 2014 #9

Exactly! But wait! I'm sure she's concocting a nuanced position that tries to splain, ie, deny, her corporatist leanings. InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2014 #10

They aren't called Monsatan for nothing - nt Boreal Dec 2014 #68

Hillary will run to Obama's right. And lose. blkmusclmachine Dec 2014 #3

Doubtful that would happen AgingAmerican Dec 2014 #73

Great! Another reason I'm glad she'll be our next President mathematic Dec 2014 #4

lol. nt laundry_queen Dec 2014 #23

This was also last year: Which Democrats Just Voted Against GMO Labeling? misterhighwasted Dec 2014 #5

Here was Elizabeth's reason for voting "no" on this~ RiverLover Dec 2014 #6

Which is pretty lame wyldwolf Dec 2014 #59

Do you have a point or just showing some statistics? Do you deny that H. Clinton-Sachs favors GMO's rhett o rick Dec 2014 #13

??? Not denying anything. Just offering a list of all the Dems who voted no. misterhighwasted Dec 2014 #15

I apologize if I misunderstood your point. You weren't very clear. nm rhett o rick Dec 2014 #71

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2014 #28

She's Not What She Seems billhicks76 Dec 2014 #7

It's as plain as the nose on your face. InAbLuEsTaTe Dec 2014 #11

You were alerted...... Logical Dec 2014 #12

I'm Sorry To See billhicks76 Dec 2014 #14

I guess they can alert on me, too Aerows Dec 2014 #17

Thank You billhicks76 Dec 2014 #21

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2014 #27

+ 1000 nt Logical Dec 2014 #33

What Really Sucks billhicks76 Dec 2014 #52

Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2014 #26

anyone else think she's going to run for president.... Doctor_J Dec 2014 #8

I love DU Aerows Dec 2014 #16

A damn fine reason to vote for her. Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2014 #18

You really believe that anyone who is against GMO is against science? n/t cui bono Dec 2014 #19

Yes. Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2014 #20

You don't understand how GMO's scientifically and negatively impact soils, crops, people. NYC_SKP Dec 2014 #22

How about just plain ole facts on herbicide use, then. RiverLover Dec 2014 #25

GMO is a tool, like a hammer, just because someone uses it to bludgeon... evirus Dec 2014 #30

LABEL or BAN???? Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #31

What other option is there for opponents of GMOs? evirus Dec 2014 #35

Any idea why Candidate Obama promised to make GMO labeling a priority? nationalize the fed Dec 2014 #24

ObAna wasn't a geneticist or a biochemist evirus Dec 2014 #29

So the PUBLIC has no right to know what they are eating? Cosmic Kitten Dec 2014 #32

If only it were that simple evirus Dec 2014 #34

I call BS. They have to put the sugar & fat content on labels RiverLover Dec 2014 #36

I'd go farther, anything less than a detailed description of how the ingredient differs from nature evirus Dec 2014 #41

ObAna? He is President Obama. misterhighwasted Dec 2014 #64

Just a typo evirus Dec 2014 #72

Good for her. Anti-GMO'ers are the creationists of this party bhikkhu Dec 2014 #37

You've bought the propaganda. RiverLover Dec 2014 #40

Sounds like you bought the propaganda coming from green peace evirus Dec 2014 #42

This was THIS year, and it is still important RiverLover Dec 2014 #38

MoveOn petition to Hillary Clinton re: GMOs RiverLover Dec 2014 #39

signed. Against Romney is the ONLY time I'm laserhaas Dec 2014 #43

Monsanto is Ready for Hillary. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2014 #44

Them and all the agra industry shills. L0oniX Dec 2014 #63

Yes & they apparently have quite a few more Dems misterhighwasted Dec 2014 #66

That bill for GMO labeling gave too much control to the states in the future RiverLover Dec 2014 #70

And Warren, and Franken AgingAmerican Dec 2014 #74

It seems like those concerned would start farming their own produce, etc. Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #45

I expect that the loved ones of those killed by GMOs will campaign against her (nt) Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #46

like who? wyldwolf Dec 2014 #47

There must be thousands, judging by all the threads on DU.... no? (nt) Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #49

ah, yes. We're on the same wavelength now. wyldwolf Dec 2014 #55

+A Brazilian! n/t Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2014 #60

Hillary would be a republican... gerogie2 Dec 2014 #48

At least she never supported Reaganomics (nt) Nye Bevan Dec 2014 #50

All presidents since the mid 70s have been Reaganites. immoderate Dec 2014 #53

you forgot the 'sarcasm' tag wyldwolf Dec 2014 #56

No I didn't gerogie2 Dec 2014 #57

So you seriously think the only thing separating Clinton from the GOP is reproductive rights? wyldwolf Dec 2014 #58

She was a Goldwater Republican. gerogie2 Dec 2014 #61

So? wyldwolf Dec 2014 #69

When she was 17 AgingAmerican Dec 2014 #75

Hillary would be a republican... FiveGoodMen Dec 2014 #67

ba-da-Boom! goes the dynamite. nt truebluegreen Dec 2014 #77

Agribusiness is detrimental to public health True Blue Door Dec 2014 #51

I'm no Hillary supporter, but I don't see the problem with GMOs. Marr Dec 2014 #54

Making sure we don't have the right to know what is in our food. L0oniX Dec 2014 #62

People who are anti GMO kind of remind me of climate deniers or anti-vaccers. dilby Dec 2014 #65

Of course she does. truebluegreen Dec 2014 #76

k & r for more exposure! n/t wildbilln864 Dec 2014 #78