Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bobclark86

(1,415 posts)
27. So... you DID entirely miss the 90s and 2000s then...
Fri Dec 26, 2014, 01:28 PM
Dec 2014

Go look at her voting record from her time in the Senate. Go look at what she pushed in the '90s -- when she was the most-active first lady since Eleanor Roosevelt (one of the main reasons Republicans hate her is because she actually DID things, unlike Laura Bush who just kind of sat there doing what women "should" do).

http://www.ontheissues.org/Profile_Hillary_Clinton.htm

Seriously, go look. There are hundreds of her positions posted with sources. Go look at gun control, health care, etc.

"We need to stand firm on behalf of sensible gun control legislation. We have to enact laws that will keep guns out of the hand of children and criminals and mentally unbalanced persons. Congress should have acted before our children started going back to school. I realize the NRA is a formidable political group; but I believe the American people are ready to come together as a nation and do whatever it takes to keep guns away from people who shouldn’t have them."
Source: www.hillary2000.org, “Gun Safety” Sep 9, 2000

"We have to do all of these things: We do have to go after racial profiling. I’ve supported legislation to try to tackle that. We have to go after mandatory minimums. You know, mandatory sentences for certain violent crimes may be appropriate, but it has been too widely used. And it is using now a discriminatory impact. We need diversion, like drug courts. Non-violent offenders should not be serving hard time in our prisons. They need to be diverted from our prison system."
Source: 2007 Democratic Primary Debate at Howard University Jun 28, 2007

"I have a comprehensive energy plan that does not rely on nuclear power. I have said we should not be siting any more coal-powered plants unless they can have the most modern, clean technology. I want big demonstration projects to figure out how we would capture and sequester carbon. This is going to take a massive effort. This should be our Apollo moon shot. There’s work for everybody to do--the states, communities and individuals. That’s what I want to summon the country to achieve."
Source: 2008 Democratic debate in Las Vegas Jan 15, 2008

"Later today, the president will veto a bill passed by Congress to support stem cell research. I co-chair the Alzheimer’s Caucus in the Senate. I’ve worked on helping to boost funding for research to look for cures and a way to prevent so many devastating diseases. And we know that stem cell research holds the key to our understanding more about what we can do. When I am president, I will lift the ban on stem cell research. This is just one example of how the president puts ideology before science."
Source: Take Back America 2007 Conference Jun 20, 2007

"This (abortion) decision, which is one of the most fundamental, difficult, and soul-searching decisions a woman and a family can make, is also one in which the government should have no role."
Source: The Case for Hillary Clinton, by Susan Estrich, p. 54 Oct 17, 2005

And one for the anti-Walmart crowd
FactCheck: Pushed Wal-Mart for women managers & environment
Obama attacked Clinton’s one-time membership on the board of directors of the world’s largest retailer, saying, “While I was watching those folks see their jobs shift overseas, you were a corporate lawyer sitting on the board at Wal-Mart.”
It’s true that Clinton sat on the Wal-Mart board for six years while her husband was governor of Arkansas, where the chain has its corporate headquarters. She was paid about $18,000 a year for doing it. At the time, she worked at the Rose Law Firm, which had represented Wal-Mart in various matters.
But according to accounts from other board members, Clinton was a thorn in the side of the company’s founder, Sam Walton, on the matter of promoting women, few of whom were in the ranks of managers or executives at the time. She also strongly advocated for more environmentally sound corporate practices. She made limited progress in both areas. In 2005 she returned a $5,000 contribution from Wal-Mart, citing “serious differences” with its “current” practices.
Source: FactCheck.org on 2008 Congressional Black Caucus Dem. Debate Jan 21, 2008


But it's easier to crap on her for "com(ing) from the same cloth; the center-right," as a friggin' Bush family member I suppose, rather than actually learning something.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

If 2016 is Clinton vs Bush [View all] DonCoquixote Dec 2014 OP
Is Jeb intelligent? TexasTowelie Dec 2014 #1
If another Bush ends up nominated, I think that it's proof of pathological sickness... MrScorpio Dec 2014 #2
Because corporations are inherently amoral, and being that silvershadow Dec 2014 #6
The same could be said regarding electing another Clinton. Jackpine Radical Dec 2014 #26
Indeed. hifiguy Dec 2014 #32
Yeah, because... bobclark86 Dec 2014 #3
show me where Hillary had said she would do these things DonCoquixote Dec 2014 #7
easy VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #19
So... you DID entirely miss the 90s and 2000s then... bobclark86 Dec 2014 #27
speeches DonCoquixote Dec 2014 #36
So... you see dozens of positions she has different than Jeb Bush... bobclark86 Dec 2014 #40
Funnt how I even said i would vote for her if she was the last choice DonCoquixote Dec 2014 #41
What other candidates have answered or given positions on everything? Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #42
not on everythign DonCoquixote Dec 2014 #45
If that happens I predict that DU will be dead in the water. delrem Dec 2014 #4
.... DeSwiss Dec 2014 #5
Have you looked at Hillary and Jeb on the issues? Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #8
Pro TPP and GMO is left liberal? PADemD Dec 2014 #17
Shhhhhh - just look at the blue linkies.......you are getting sleepy......just pledge...... n/t djean111 Dec 2014 #28
Their stands are not based on a couple of issues. As far as the GMO are concerned if the bills are Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #37
"really left liberal" marmar Dec 2014 #46
it will be quite a spectacle IMHO. n/t wildbilln864 Dec 2014 #9
Well . . . maybe from the distance of a thousand years and a galaxy far far away ucrdem Dec 2014 #10
If 2016 is Clinton vs Bush America LOSES no matter which one wins. ChosenUnWisely Dec 2014 #11
thats total bunk VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #13
OK We are all entitled to our own opinion and choice in the voting booth ChosenUnWisely Dec 2014 #16
and thank god cooler heads will prevail then VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #18
Whoever you think the "cooler heads" are, here at DU, will have zero impact djean111 Dec 2014 #29
America cannot afford anymore politicians, period. AgingAmerican Dec 2014 #44
As soon as Jeb announced he was exploring, pundits began predicting very low turnout if it's merrily Dec 2014 #12
did everyone turn out to vote for Obama? VanillaRhapsody Dec 2014 #14
could be a five-party race. rogerashton Dec 2014 #15
Young people are libertarian, really??? DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2014 #21
Your confidence is inspiring, if not rogerashton Dec 2014 #22
"Want to get your undies untwisted?" DemocratSinceBirth Dec 2014 #25
I prefer not to contemplate LWolf Dec 2014 #20
Clinton vs Bush = centrist left vs centrist right. The most boring election season evah. L0oniX Dec 2014 #23
Yeah, it used to be called the Democratic Party. Seems like that, anyway. n/t djean111 Dec 2014 #30
More like Corporatist Red vs. Corporatist Blue. hedda_foil Dec 2014 #38
I will be voting for someone else bigwillq Dec 2014 #24
I don't share your optimism about the type of SCOTUS justices Clinton might appoint tularetom Dec 2014 #31
I agree. I don't understand why anyone thinks Hillary will appoint anything but a djean111 Dec 2014 #33
true, but DonCoquixote Dec 2014 #35
Decision 2016: "One winner, 320 million losers". hughee99 Dec 2014 #34
if that happens I'll be voting third party. 99Forever Dec 2014 #39
...get me sick bucket. roamer65 Dec 2014 #43
Then Marx will be right about history repeating itself 2nd time as farce. nt daredtowork Dec 2014 #47
I've almost resigned myself that it will be Hillary Clinton vs. Jeb Bush davidpdx Dec 2014 #48
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If 2016 is Clinton vs Bus...»Reply #27