Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CountAllVotes

(22,240 posts)
91. btw ...
Fri Dec 26, 2014, 06:15 PM
Dec 2014

I'm still have my car which is going on 15 years old. It must last forever as I have no way to get another one. I'm kind of glad in a way as who wants one of these new computerized things that cost lots and lots of $$$ to fix?

As for me, I guess I got lucky. My lawyer got my case through ASAP after going blind and yes, that is what it took -- going blind and had no way to go and "see" a doctor being I was bedridden as well. *eek*

Shame shame shame on these people that are so self-absorbed that all they think of is their "portfolio" and Wall Street!

I would never wish blindness nor the disease I have on anyone but ... at times ...



Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

this is bullshit...if we can bail out the banks, we can take care of the disabled. nt antigop Dec 2014 #1
The goverment made money on the bank bailout, it was a win win situation for the citizens Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #30
Is that true.... daleanime Dec 2014 #35
I did not address the lack of prosecution,off-shored tax profits, gutted regulations, excessive Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #44
We both agree.... daleanime Dec 2014 #48
I have a rather long post I'm working on madokie Dec 2014 #84
It's not that I'm missing the one point, I get that.... daleanime Dec 2014 #93
Only because of trillions in back-door bailouts MannyGoldstein Dec 2014 #38
You know the government came out well on the bank bailouts and are smart enough understand Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #46
And in whose favor..... daleanime Dec 2014 #47
If the government made money on this deal whose favor would you think it would be? Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #59
It would hurt the country if millions more became homeless CreekDog Dec 2014 #86
It is more than figuring out who purchased homes which was out of their price range from the start. Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #88
I find myself unable to make.... daleanime Dec 2014 #94
It was a win for the banks brentspeak Dec 2014 #50
Propaganda? That would be by the denial of how much money went out and how much returned. Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #60
Win-win-lose Scuba Dec 2014 #65
+1 Enthusiast Dec 2014 #75
-1 Enthusiast Dec 2014 #74
+1 Enthusiast Dec 2014 #73
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2014 #61
screw the poor.. 1handclapn Dec 2014 #2
In addition to owning all that money customerserviceguy Dec 2014 #4
+100 NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #12
but..but...Obama is a wealth redistributionist,,, golfguru Dec 2014 #13
Silly! The ONLY reason Obama's socialist-marxist-nazi-commie dreams haven't come to pass... Beartracks Dec 2014 #15
The republicans are clueless. golfguru Dec 2014 #54
Pfft! Facts, nothing more!! Beartracks Dec 2014 #92
Meme? Those accusations were a well rehearsed smokescreen. Enthusiast Dec 2014 #76
SSDI is not income contingent CountAllVotes Dec 2014 #34
Scoot over CountAll... dotymed Dec 2014 #70
:( CountAllVotes Dec 2014 #81
btw ... CountAllVotes Dec 2014 #91
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2014 #62
The Social Security retirement funds customerserviceguy Dec 2014 #3
that term "Grand Bargain" - I always wondered LiberalElite Dec 2014 #5
The only thing grand about it customerserviceguy Dec 2014 #8
Ah. Thanks for explaining. nt LiberalElite Dec 2014 #11
The supposed 'fix' didn't fix a damn thing, it was just another scam. And you're misinformed; NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #19
Well, then customerserviceguy Dec 2014 #25
Doubt they can either; but who's getting all the money, since GDP per capita is larger than NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #32
Your question customerserviceguy Dec 2014 #37
you midunderstood. Real (inflation adjusted) US GDP per capita is higher than ever before in NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #41
How could you check this? aspirant Dec 2014 #56
huh? what does the fdic have to do with anything? NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #57
Sorry, made the change. aspirant Dec 2014 #58
Raise the pay-in income threshold up to $500,000.00. That should fix the problem! Tax the rich. Dont call me Shirley Dec 2014 #52
Message auto-removed Name removed Dec 2014 #63
Not neccesarily lancer78 Dec 2014 #82
Here is how Candidate Obama was going to fix Social Security: bvar22 Dec 2014 #29
+100 NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #33
Cap raises customerserviceguy Dec 2014 #39
You don't necessarily have to raise benefits exboyfil Dec 2014 #40
+1 daleanime Dec 2014 #49
Ask Bernie Sanders, he has the facts. Raising the cap will raise all the revenue needed. Dont call me Shirley Dec 2014 #53
Why is not raising the cap such a sacred cow? I don't recall ever hearing that Congress was Stardust Dec 2014 #55
Because it is a significant tax increase, and a lot of Democrats woould feel Hoyt Dec 2014 #64
It's a slight increase only appllied to the portion of income in excess of the cap at $118,500 Bluenorthwest Dec 2014 #66
It's a 12 percentage point increase on amounts over the cap. We can't get any Hoyt Dec 2014 #67
FWIW....when an SSDI recipient turns 65, they are switched to regular Soc. Sec. funds. dixiegrrrrl Dec 2014 #78
Good point customerserviceguy Dec 2014 #95
I hate every piece of shit that will hold onecaliberal Dec 2014 #6
imagine 9 million more Americans fucked over Ramses Dec 2014 #9
WTF? How can that be?? We gave the rich all the money so they could create jobs and save us all! Beartracks Dec 2014 #16
For 2013 there was a $32 billion shortfall. Igel Dec 2014 #7
"pushed some marginally disabled to stop working and go on disability" NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #20
Not to mention you don't go on disability. onecaliberal Dec 2014 #43
Indeed. You have to get a lawyer or you will be denied and then the lawyer gets some of the back pay L0oniX Dec 2014 #69
Yup... My wife has emphysema, heart disease, SomethingFishy Dec 2014 #72
I've already planned for it gerogie2 Dec 2014 #10
I can see right away Cryptoad Dec 2014 #14
What, no ponies? They just don't understand how government works. Doctor_J Dec 2014 #17
the swooners have not come up with the meme to cover this yet but they will Skittles Dec 2014 #24
"swooners" - like 840high Dec 2014 #26
When it comes to GOP in Congress tooeyeten Dec 2014 #18
and you might see, if you study the matter, that a lot of the super-rich often have more than NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #21
Kicked and recced. madfloridian Dec 2014 #22
There is a fallback built into the current law madville Dec 2014 #23
The fix that will probably be agreed to is to redirect some FICA taxes from Social Security PoliticAverse Dec 2014 #51
Couldn't they just raise or scrap the cap? Alkene Dec 2014 #68
Of course they could, but it doesn't seem likely the Republicans would agree to that. n/t PoliticAverse Dec 2014 #77
Here would be a good place to print. nt abelenkpe Dec 2014 #27
I am afraid it is all a house of cards SSI, SSDI, Medicare,SS and our pensions and nobody is doing doc03 Dec 2014 #28
But they didn't say that about the money that bailed out the banking industry, did they? NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #36
Yeah. Where did that $15 billion in profit go? It sure as hell didn't go to shore up food stamps. liberal_at_heart Dec 2014 #45
This will put the 2016 contenders to the test, especially the Democrats. WinkyDink Dec 2014 #31
All they have to do is say the right thing and then do the opposite when they get elected. liberal_at_heart Dec 2014 #42
BS negoldie Dec 2014 #71
We are in the exact same boat CountAllVotes Dec 2014 #80
The other zinger in California: No food stamps daredtowork Dec 2014 #79
California adds money to people's SSI payments in lieu of food stamps... PoliticAverse Dec 2014 #83
The money does not make up for the cost of living daredtowork Dec 2014 #85
Your talking about SSI CountAllVotes Dec 2014 #87
That's right, I was responding to the post about SSI/SSDI recipients not being eligible PoliticAverse Dec 2014 #89
You are correct CountAllVotes Dec 2014 #90
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Disabled Recipients of So...»Reply #91