Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Obama hopes to enlist GOP in push for trade pact, despite Democratic resistance [View all]RiverLover
(7,830 posts)16. Blast from the Past -- Obama 2008
Obama's Speech on Manufacturing and Trade
April 2008
"What I came to understand was that when a plant shuts down, its not just the workers who pay a price, its the whole community. I saw folks who felt like their government wasnt looking out for them and who had given up hope. So I worked with unions and the city government, and we brought the community together to fight for its common future. We gave job-training to the jobless and hope to the hopeless, and block by block, we helped turn those neighborhoods around.
...But we also know this is a problem that goes beyond the failures of George Bush because for decades, through both Democratic and Republican administrations, weve seen the number of American-owned steel companies dwindle down. For decades, our economic policies have been written to pump up a corporate bottom line, rather than promote whats right, without any consideration for the burden we all bear when workers are abused or the environment is destroyed.
Its an outrage, but its not an accident because corporate lobbyists in Washington are writing our laws and putting their clients interests ahead of whats fair for the American people. The men and women you represent havent been getting a seat at the table when trade agreements are being negotiated, or tax policies are being written, or health care and pension laws are being designed because the special interests have bought every chair.
Thats not the America I believe in. Thats not the America you believe in. And thats why when Im President, well make sure Washington serves nobodys interests but the peoples.
You know, theres been a lot of talk in this campaign lately about whos in touch with the workers of Pennsylvania. Senator Clinton and Senator McCain are singing from the same hymn book, saying that Im out of touch an elitist because I said a lot of folks are bitter about their economic circumstances.
...For America to win, American workers have to win, too. If CEO pay keeps rising, while the standard of living for their workers continues to decline, thats not a win for America.
Thats why I opposed NAFTA, its why I opposed CAFTA, and its why I said any trade agreement I would support had to contain real, enforceable standards for workers.
Thats why I believe the Permanent Normalized Trade agreement with China didnt do enough to ensure fairness and compliance.
Now, you can have a debate about whether my position is right or wrong. But heres what you cant do. You cant spend the better part of two decades campaigning for NAFTA and PNTR for China, and then come here to Pennsylvania, and tell the steelworkers youve been with them all along. You cant say you are opposed to the Colombia Trade deal, while your key strategist is working for the Colombian government to get the deal passed.
Thats not respect. Thats just more of the same old Washington politics. And we cant afford more of the same.
We need real change, and thats what Im offering. Im offering a new, more transparent and more inclusive path on trade so we can help promote an integrated global economy where the costs and benefits are distributed more equitably. And it starts with a principle Ive always believed in that trade should work for all Americans...."
http://www.cfr.org/elections/obamas-speech-manufacturing-trade/p16018
April 2008
"What I came to understand was that when a plant shuts down, its not just the workers who pay a price, its the whole community. I saw folks who felt like their government wasnt looking out for them and who had given up hope. So I worked with unions and the city government, and we brought the community together to fight for its common future. We gave job-training to the jobless and hope to the hopeless, and block by block, we helped turn those neighborhoods around.
...But we also know this is a problem that goes beyond the failures of George Bush because for decades, through both Democratic and Republican administrations, weve seen the number of American-owned steel companies dwindle down. For decades, our economic policies have been written to pump up a corporate bottom line, rather than promote whats right, without any consideration for the burden we all bear when workers are abused or the environment is destroyed.
Its an outrage, but its not an accident because corporate lobbyists in Washington are writing our laws and putting their clients interests ahead of whats fair for the American people. The men and women you represent havent been getting a seat at the table when trade agreements are being negotiated, or tax policies are being written, or health care and pension laws are being designed because the special interests have bought every chair.
Thats not the America I believe in. Thats not the America you believe in. And thats why when Im President, well make sure Washington serves nobodys interests but the peoples.
You know, theres been a lot of talk in this campaign lately about whos in touch with the workers of Pennsylvania. Senator Clinton and Senator McCain are singing from the same hymn book, saying that Im out of touch an elitist because I said a lot of folks are bitter about their economic circumstances.
...For America to win, American workers have to win, too. If CEO pay keeps rising, while the standard of living for their workers continues to decline, thats not a win for America.
Thats why I opposed NAFTA, its why I opposed CAFTA, and its why I said any trade agreement I would support had to contain real, enforceable standards for workers.
Thats why I believe the Permanent Normalized Trade agreement with China didnt do enough to ensure fairness and compliance.
Now, you can have a debate about whether my position is right or wrong. But heres what you cant do. You cant spend the better part of two decades campaigning for NAFTA and PNTR for China, and then come here to Pennsylvania, and tell the steelworkers youve been with them all along. You cant say you are opposed to the Colombia Trade deal, while your key strategist is working for the Colombian government to get the deal passed.
Thats not respect. Thats just more of the same old Washington politics. And we cant afford more of the same.
We need real change, and thats what Im offering. Im offering a new, more transparent and more inclusive path on trade so we can help promote an integrated global economy where the costs and benefits are distributed more equitably. And it starts with a principle Ive always believed in that trade should work for all Americans...."
http://www.cfr.org/elections/obamas-speech-manufacturing-trade/p16018
I really wish, more than anything, that this had been sincere.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
116 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Obama hopes to enlist GOP in push for trade pact, despite Democratic resistance [View all]
n2doc
Dec 2014
OP
If you have a min wage and a Chinese company can go to their in house negotiator court and win damages
Vincardog
Dec 2014
#86
How do you know what is in it? Even Congress cannot see this 'global deal' which is an outrage. The
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#36
What we've learned (no scare quotes) is OBAMA's discreditable negotiating position
Jim Lane
Dec 2014
#79
You emphasize public review but you're OK with fast track, which drastically curtails that review.
Jim Lane
Dec 2014
#94
Considering that they don't seem to be doing much else, you're probably right.
Buns_of_Fire
Dec 2014
#100
Union membership holds a vote to accept or decline a contrat. Without that vote there is no contract
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2014
#95
If as you state "The time to debate/comment on the agreement is the time between when the trade
Vincardog
Dec 2014
#102
There hasn't been a modern trade deal that has benefitted American workers ...
1StrongBlackMan
Dec 2014
#67
I'm wishing him a major fail on the TPP. This is a horrible bit of legislation, IMHO. n/t
CaliforniaPeggy
Dec 2014
#3
Sad, isn't it? So much good will built up, particularly over the past month or so.
arcane1
Dec 2014
#9
I can't wait to come on to DU and read about how this is supposed to be a good thing.
arcane1
Dec 2014
#4
Like how every superb liberal thing he does is instantly forgotten or denigrated?
True Blue Door
Dec 2014
#13
You don't have to wait, I just responded to such a post above. The Third Way is ready for anyone
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#38
Intellectualism is not defined by giving the same old bullshit credence each time it is uttered.
TheKentuckian
Dec 2014
#108
Obama is an '80s Republican. He's said so himself on more than one occassion.
blkmusclmachine
Dec 2014
#7
Let the teabaggers use whatever terminology they want. The point is that Obama is trying
totodeinhere
Dec 2014
#23
I thought the complaint du jour was that TPP was being negotiated secretively.
True Blue Door
Dec 2014
#25
Yes, of course that is a complaint. Are you suggesting that our elected officials in Congress have
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#39
I guess you have't been following this over the past few years. Congress would like, in fact they
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#42
'Hysteria, paranoia'! That says it all. You clearly refuse to accept the FACTS which you are
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#56
"I said any trade agreement I would support had to contain real, enforceable standards for workers."
pampango
Dec 2014
#29
Looks like Obama and his GOP partners are going to succeed in getting fast track. How nice for them.
pa28
Dec 2014
#19
Then we have to listen to right wingers blaming the Democratic party for the next 30 yrs.
B Calm
Dec 2014
#116
"Democrats keep losing because we don't defend government actions enough!" (or something like that)
MisterP
Dec 2014
#28
This could mean a pay cut for 90% of US workers, of course Democrats don't want it.
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#46
600 corps have seen the TPP in full, along with some unions. Here's what the unions think~
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#50
K&R It is the desire of Wall St supporters and investors, it will happen. nt
raouldukelives
Dec 2014
#54
As long as we get those 2 dollar a day salaries. It will be cause to celebrate more American
Katashi_itto
Dec 2014
#59
Holy Crap%*!@ Just read full article linked...This started out as a George W Bush deal.
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#72
Right, but that isn't what this story is about. Its about his own party being ag it and needing GOP
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#83
"Obama Ran Twice on Anti-NAFTA Free Trade; He was Lying to Us. Big TPP Push"
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#85