Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Whoa... X-Posted From DU Religion Group... 'Jesus Wasn’t Born Rich. Think About It.' - DailyBeast [View all]merrily
(45,251 posts)83. Please see Reply 31.
The OT is indeed part of the Christian Bible, but, as we all know, everything in the OT is not part of the Christian religion. Supposedly, only the things "carried forward" into the NT are part of the Christian religion. As reply 31 states, Jesus did not purport to carry forward very much. The Apostle Paul, who never met Jesus, however, "carried forward" a lot of mess.
Again, for purposes of easy discussion only, I am not citing in each post the possibility that Jesus never existed, even as a mortal. We all know what the relevant arguments are and are not. But, if we are debating what the Bible says and does not say, it's just easier to assume certain things, rather than qualify every sentence.
Cannot edit, recommend, or reply in locked discussions
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
86 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Whoa... X-Posted From DU Religion Group... 'Jesus Wasn’t Born Rich. Think About It.' - DailyBeast [View all]
WillyT
Dec 2014
OP
Being a distant descendant of a king in Biblical times was no guaranty of wealth.
merrily
Dec 2014
#3
You were the one who brought up the alleged significance of his descent from King David, first as
merrily
Dec 2014
#46
Obviously, I assumed that Warren was continuing our conversation and did not even
merrily
Dec 2014
#68
Actually he's not of David's line and not the Messiah given the virgin birth....
Moonwalk
Dec 2014
#69
Yep. And Jews trace lineage through the Mom, not the father (or putative father).
merrily
Dec 2014
#81
Manger... Such A Nice Word For A Barn... And A Word Most Of Us Would Not Have Heard Of...
WillyT
Dec 2014
#12
A barn houses animals. A manger is where the food for animals is placed. We might say "trough."
merrily
Dec 2014
#18
You said manger is such a nice word for a barn. It's not. (BTW, you're welcome for the right info.)
merrily
Dec 2014
#25
Yes, you've now proved that, as I said, "manger" is not a nice word for a barn.
merrily
Dec 2014
#75
Not sure, either, especially since Jesus birth is the subject of the OP, not the OT.
merrily
Dec 2014
#59
Context matters, both the written word and the context of a few thousand years B.C.
merrily
Dec 2014
#31
All agree the Bible contains some nasty stuff and some inconsistent stuff. My prior post also
merrily
Dec 2014
#58
"Be nice to the poor: doesn't equate to "give everything you own away," either.
merrily
Dec 2014
#62
If we're talking context then remember that god has innocent Canaanites murdered, their land stolen...
Moonwalk
Dec 2014
#74
And that relates to whether the Bible says Joseph was poor when Jesus was born how?
merrily
Dec 2014
#79
There's a lot of condemnation of greed, self-centeredness and heartlessness in the Bible.
merrily
Dec 2014
#16
But if you call it socialism, then you get to call some self-righteous bigots
daredtowork
Dec 2014
#26
The same Jesus who said great things about helping the poor also said some stuff
merrily
Dec 2014
#28
Yes, I've had that discussion before. However, if you are posting on a thread talking about
merrily
Dec 2014
#44
Joseph? Yes. (The OP is talking about the alleged finances of the family when Jesus was born.)
merrily
Dec 2014
#48
Jesus was also a carpenter. (I don't know that the Bible talks of apprenticeship as such. I assume
merrily
Dec 2014
#52
I've read the Bible cover to cover several times. (Have you?) As to matters about Joseph and Mary,
merrily
Dec 2014
#65
Do you think changing the subject will make you any "righter" about whether Joseph
merrily
Dec 2014
#71
PS My replying to a specific post to me does not mean my reply equals all I got from the OP.
merrily
Dec 2014
#67
What ??? - Joseph And Mary Were Broke... But Once Jesus Was Born It Was All Null And Void ???
WillyT
Dec 2014
#19
Unless you can cite a biblical verse to show that Joseph and Mary were broke, you
merrily
Dec 2014
#33
No, I asked you first. As for Robinson, I can't help what he says. Does he claim infalliblility?
merrily
Dec 2014
#43
Well merrily... You Bring Up Provacative Points... But I'm Gonna Go With The Bishop On This One...
WillyT
Dec 2014
#51
Going with the Bishop on Joseph, as opposed to going with the Bible? Okay. It's a free country.
merrily
Dec 2014
#53
Agree. "Blessed are the poor..." But the moneychangers story has a whole other level to it.
merrily
Dec 2014
#23
Anyone can say anything. Can anyone back up the statement that Joseph was poor is the issue.
merrily
Dec 2014
#45
Jesus got it but the rw do not - they just think well if it was good enough for our Lord then it is
jwirr
Dec 2014
#22