Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NewDeal_Dem

(1,049 posts)
15. Inspiring story
Sat Dec 27, 2014, 05:26 PM
Dec 2014

To use Le Guin’s language, physics is inevitable: if you put more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, the planet warms, and as the planet warms, various kinds of chaos and ruin are let loose. Politics, on the other hand, is not inevitable. For example, not so many years ago it would have seemed inevitable that Chevron, currently the third biggest corporation in the country, would run the refinery town of Richmond, California, as its own private fiefdom. You could say that the divine right of Chevron seemed like a given. Except that people in Richmond refused to accept it and so this town of 107,000 mostly poor nonwhites pushed back.

In recent years, a group of progressives won election to the city council and the mayor’s seat, despite huge expenditures by Chevron, the corporation that also brought you gigantic oil spills onshore in Ecuador and offshore in Brazil, massive contamination from half a century of oil extraction in Nigeria, and Canadian tar-sands bitumen sent by rail to the Richmond refinery. Mayor Gayle McLaughin and her cohorts organized a little revolution in a town that had mostly been famous for its crime rate and for Chevron’s toxic refinery emissions, which periodically create emergencies, sometimes requiring everyone to take shelter (and pretend that they are not being poisoned indoors), sometimes said — by Chevron — to be harmless, as with last Thursday’s flames that lit up the sky, visible as far away as Oakland.

As McLaughin put it of her era as mayor:

“We’ve accomplished so much, including breathing better air, reducing the pollution, and building a cleaner environment and cleaner jobs, and reducing our crime rate. Our homicide number is the lowest in 33 years and we became a leading city in the Bay Area for solar installed per capita. We’re a sanctuary city. And we’re defending our homeowners to prevent foreclosures and evictions. And we also got Chevron to pay $114 million extra dollars in taxes.”

For this November’s election, the second-largest oil company on Earth officially spent $3.1 million to defeat McLaughin and other progressive candidates and install a mayor and council more to its liking. That sum worked out to about $180 per Richmond voter, but my brother David, who’s long been connected to Richmond politics, points out that, if you look at all the other ways the company spends to influence local politics, it might be roughly ten times that.

Nonetheless, Chevron lost. None of its candidates were elected and all the grassroots progressives it fought with billboards, mailers, television ads, websites, and everything else a lavishly funded smear campaign can come up with, won.

If a small coalition like that can win locally against a corporation that had revenues of $228.9 billion in 2013, imagine what a large global coalition could do against the fossil-fuel giants. It wasn’t easy in Richmond and it won’t be easy on the largest scale either, but it’s not impossible. The Richmond progressives won by imagining that the status quo was not inevitable, no less an eternal way of life. They showed up to do the work to dent that inevitability. The billionaires and fossil fuel corporations are intensely engaged in politics all the time, everywhere, and they count on us to stay on the sidelines. If you look at their response to various movements, you can see that they fear the moment we wake up, show up, and exercise our power to counter theirs.

That power operated on a larger scale last week, when local activists and public health professionals applied sufficient pressure to get New York Governor Andrew Cuomo to sign legislation banning fracking statewide. Until the news broke on December 17th, the outcome had seemed uncertain...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

k and r and thank you for posting. niyad Dec 2014 #1
... xchrom Dec 2014 #2
Highly misleading title. I wish the title were true but, if anything, the periodic KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #3
Perhaps 2naSalit Dec 2014 #5
"Capitalism is ending. To find out more, buy my book!" Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #20
Heh. branford Dec 2014 #26
I'll buy that... 2naSalit Dec 2014 #51
Thanks for posting 2naSalit Dec 2014 #4
If King George had had Fox "News" and hate radio, we'd still be flying the Union Jack Doctor_J Dec 2014 #6
Indeed. The nonstop medIa propaganda and psyops hifiguy Dec 2014 #11
My Own Quote Dirty Socialist Dec 2014 #7
K&R. This should be today's top story on DU. JDPriestly Dec 2014 #8
K&R.... daleanime Dec 2014 #9
Every time I see someone saying that I wonder - where to from here? We seem to be heading to jwirr Dec 2014 #10
At this point we are too far down the rabbit hole. hifiguy Dec 2014 #12
Thank you for the honest answer. And unfortunately that is exactly what I fear. And I have assumed jwirr Dec 2014 #13
Have you read about this? Boreal Dec 2014 #32
To agree that this is what's coming for us could be called tin foil hat conspiracy. ladyVet Dec 2014 #44
make it so. NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #14
Inspiring story NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #15
If voters in Richmond voted against Chevron, it's cuz Chevron has been shitting on them for decades. Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #21
I didn't notice solnit taking credit, I noticed her reporting. I also noticed you have some kind of NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #22
I dont know why, since the refinery catches on fire every few years. Do you know anyone who actually Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #25
I think my writing is fairly straightforward. NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #28
As is mine. Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #30
Welcome to DU Caretha Dec 2014 #50
If Rebecca Solnit is worried about climate change, maybe she should stop trying to force Google Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #16
can you explain what you're talking about? NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #18
Happy to. She was a big poop-bah behind the SF protests trying to shut down the google commuter Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #19
all i see in your article about solnit is that she wrote a newspaper article about the buses. NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #23
Uh... Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #24
those aren't the link you gave me and i'm really not in the mood to read 4 links now to see if one NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #27
Every time there was an article about those goofy protests, they interviewed her first. Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #29
if so, maybe because she's well-known and had already written the first article? maybe because NewDeal_Dem Dec 2014 #31
I didn't say it was secret. I said it was goofy. Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #33
Well, I agree that she's Boreal Dec 2014 #35
that, and cronyism. Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #37
She didn't say it. So, "full of shit" is just perpetuating the misunderstanding here. ancianita Dec 2014 #41
Agree that "the age of captalism is over" is sweeping. NOWHERE does Solnit claim that. ancianita Dec 2014 #38
And if anything is going to move the human race off of its primary energy source, it's a Salon Op-Ed Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #39
And I say that your discrediting a writer based on an editor title, or the writer's tackling Google ancianita Dec 2014 #40
Right, whatever. Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #42
That her writing can weather your criticism I'll agree with, however humble you claim it is. ancianita Dec 2014 #45
When the true master completes the great work, the people say "it happened of its own accord" Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #46
Solnit's work against Google brought attention to many levels of injustice in SF, ancianita Dec 2014 #47
Fair enough. Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #48
Read your first link Boreal Dec 2014 #34
Crap, man, tell me about it. Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #36
Huge K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Dec 2014 #17
... xchrom Dec 2014 #43
Capitalism doesn't need to die. It just needs to shrink a little. dawg Dec 2014 #49
One of the things about capitalism is that it can't shrink. rogerashton Dec 2014 #52
Not true. dawg Dec 2014 #53
If the electorate has the ultimate say, rogerashton Dec 2014 #54
The Scandinavian countries generally do a fine job of regulated capitalism. dawg Dec 2014 #55
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rebecca Solnit: The Age o...»Reply #15