Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: U.S. skies to be full of drones [View all]sad sally
(2,627 posts)18. Here's an US media source (which of course we can always believe, for your 90 sarcasms)
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/04/05/the-coming-drone-revolution-what-you-should-know
The Coming Drone Revolution: What You Should Know - April 5, 2012
In a couple years there could be as many as 30,000 drones swooping through American skies doing everything from taking aerial photos, monitoring natural disasters, and maybe even delivering tacos. While drones can certainly help law enforcement and bolster the economy, America needs to think long and hard about the implications of unmanned aircraft use, a panel of experts said at the Brookings Institution Thursday.
(snip)
Kenneth Anderson, a law professor and senior fellow at Brookings, says the government needs to anticipate there will be bumps in the road when drones are eventually implemented. Someone will weaponize them, creeps will use them to spy on their neighborsbut that doesn't mean drones are bad, he says.
"The worst thing we can do is allow the law to be driven by really ugly cases," he says. Peeping tom and stalking laws should be updated now, not after drones are already in the air. "There will be casessomething horrific is going to happen, it'll be drones combined with cyber stalking and someone throws themselves off a roof in despair. If we enacted a criminal set of sanctions in response to this, it'd be a bad approach. We can already anticipate these situations."
(snip)
The cost of flying a surveillance airplane or helicopter is several magnitudes above that of a battery-powered drone. The UAVs can stay aloft for long periods of time, and unlike helicopters, they can't be easily detected. "People behave differently when they know they're under surveillance," says Catherine Crump, of the American Civil Liberties Union. "We are not opposed to the domestic use of drones, but we're concerned that they could become tools of general or pervasive surveillance."
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/04/05/the-coming-drone-revolution-what-you-should-know
The Coming Drone Revolution: What You Should Know - April 5, 2012
In a couple years there could be as many as 30,000 drones swooping through American skies doing everything from taking aerial photos, monitoring natural disasters, and maybe even delivering tacos. While drones can certainly help law enforcement and bolster the economy, America needs to think long and hard about the implications of unmanned aircraft use, a panel of experts said at the Brookings Institution Thursday.
(snip)
Kenneth Anderson, a law professor and senior fellow at Brookings, says the government needs to anticipate there will be bumps in the road when drones are eventually implemented. Someone will weaponize them, creeps will use them to spy on their neighborsbut that doesn't mean drones are bad, he says.
"The worst thing we can do is allow the law to be driven by really ugly cases," he says. Peeping tom and stalking laws should be updated now, not after drones are already in the air. "There will be casessomething horrific is going to happen, it'll be drones combined with cyber stalking and someone throws themselves off a roof in despair. If we enacted a criminal set of sanctions in response to this, it'd be a bad approach. We can already anticipate these situations."
(snip)
The cost of flying a surveillance airplane or helicopter is several magnitudes above that of a battery-powered drone. The UAVs can stay aloft for long periods of time, and unlike helicopters, they can't be easily detected. "People behave differently when they know they're under surveillance," says Catherine Crump, of the American Civil Liberties Union. "We are not opposed to the domestic use of drones, but we're concerned that they could become tools of general or pervasive surveillance."
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2012/04/05/the-coming-drone-revolution-what-you-should-know
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
the cynic in me almost wishes I owned the company that builds those nightmares...
Blue_Tires
Apr 2012
#1
There is nothing inherently military about a remote control aircraft with a camera...
stevenleser
Apr 2012
#21
FROM THE U.K. FUCKING TELEGRAPH!! That's worse!! They knowingly let their pieces get republished by
TransitJohn
Apr 2012
#42
"Dogtown" to be monitored by drones? really? As they say in L'Rock...thad ain't raht!
HereSince1628
Apr 2012
#11
if you don't think that the friendly folks at the Tehran Times aren't looking out for your best
dionysus
Apr 2012
#17
The story is actually from the Daily Telegraph in the UK, not the Tehran Times.....
marmar
Apr 2012
#22
Here's an US media source (which of course we can always believe, for your 90 sarcasms)
sad sally
Apr 2012
#18
I already have a method for dealing with them and the black helicopters which keep circling my home
Major Nikon
Apr 2012
#25