Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)An independent progressive movement? [View all]
Offered as food for thought and discussion.
Salon / By Bill Curry comments_image 82 COMMENTS
The Democratic Party Keeps Screwing Up: Why Progressives Need to Be Independent of the Party
Progressives have no power in a corporate, focus-grouped, Wall Street-leaning party.
December 26, 2014 |
Democrats are in denial regarding the magnitude and meaning of their defeat. It is a rejection not just of current leaders but of the very business model of the modern Democratic Party: how it uses polls and focus groups to slice and dice us; how it peddles its sly, hollow message and, worst, how it sells its soul to pay for it all. Party elites hope party activists will seek to lift their moods via the cheap adrenaline high of another campaign. For once, activists may resist the urge.
The vital task for progressives isnt reelecting Democrats but rebuilding a strong, independent progressive movement. Our history makes clear that without one, social progress in America is next to impossible. For 100 years progressive social change movements transformed relations between labor and capital, buyers and sellers, blacks and whites, men and women, our species and our planet. But in the 1970s progressives began to be coopted and progress ceased. Their virtual disappearance into the Democratic Party led to political stultification and a rollback of many of their greatest achievements.
Much is written of the rise of the right, but very little of the fall of the left. Were apt to see the lefts decline, if we do see it, as a consequence of the rights superior funding, organizing and messaging, of the corporate dominance of all politics, and of white backlash against government, liberalism or modernity itself.
Its a bad analysis. The lefts fall is as much a cause as an effect of what ails us. Middle-class anger isnt about race, taxes, social services or social change. Its mainly about middle-class decline and public corruption. Democrats talk a lot about both problems but if they were really trying to solve either one, wed all know it.
The prevailing analysis fosters passivity. Whenever people speak of forces rather than choices its a sure sign they arent about to do anything. Progressives who blame their losses on globalization, white backlash or money in politics are less apt to focus on the one thing they alone control: their own choices.
The Democratic Party Keeps Screwing Up: Why Progressives Need to Be Independent of the Party
Progressives have no power in a corporate, focus-grouped, Wall Street-leaning party.
December 26, 2014 |
Democrats are in denial regarding the magnitude and meaning of their defeat. It is a rejection not just of current leaders but of the very business model of the modern Democratic Party: how it uses polls and focus groups to slice and dice us; how it peddles its sly, hollow message and, worst, how it sells its soul to pay for it all. Party elites hope party activists will seek to lift their moods via the cheap adrenaline high of another campaign. For once, activists may resist the urge.
The vital task for progressives isnt reelecting Democrats but rebuilding a strong, independent progressive movement. Our history makes clear that without one, social progress in America is next to impossible. For 100 years progressive social change movements transformed relations between labor and capital, buyers and sellers, blacks and whites, men and women, our species and our planet. But in the 1970s progressives began to be coopted and progress ceased. Their virtual disappearance into the Democratic Party led to political stultification and a rollback of many of their greatest achievements.
Much is written of the rise of the right, but very little of the fall of the left. Were apt to see the lefts decline, if we do see it, as a consequence of the rights superior funding, organizing and messaging, of the corporate dominance of all politics, and of white backlash against government, liberalism or modernity itself.
Its a bad analysis. The lefts fall is as much a cause as an effect of what ails us. Middle-class anger isnt about race, taxes, social services or social change. Its mainly about middle-class decline and public corruption. Democrats talk a lot about both problems but if they were really trying to solve either one, wed all know it.
The prevailing analysis fosters passivity. Whenever people speak of forces rather than choices its a sure sign they arent about to do anything. Progressives who blame their losses on globalization, white backlash or money in politics are less apt to focus on the one thing they alone control: their own choices.
59 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
All we have now are the moderate and hard-right/fascist wings of the Money Party.
hifiguy
Dec 2014
#56
The Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks Own And Control The Politicians That Own And Control Us
cantbeserious
Dec 2014
#2
I totally agree. My post was intended to make it clear that starting a third party
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#10
I posted something similar below. That is what the rw did with the Republican Party and it worked
jwirr
Dec 2014
#8
Yes, I agree but I don't think the suggestion is to form a Third Party, but to start a MOVEMENT.
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#39
My fault for making my point in a more clear manner. Plez see my post #10 above. nm
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#54
I cannot help but agree after seeing that we are probably going to run Hillary in 2016. After
jwirr
Dec 2014
#7
Which is why I vote for/against policies and principles rather than party or politician. K&R
Tierra_y_Libertad
Dec 2014
#16
We have a group for this here at DU - 'Populist Reform' under "Democrats" topic
RiverLover
Dec 2014
#29
I was just going to suggest that. It looks like a lot of people are moving towards the kind of
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#43
I think that is why we need a movement within the party, to change the leadership.
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#44
Of course you are correct. The Progressive Movement will have trouble raising money to
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#55