Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: End the war on heroin and cocaine NOW! [View all]Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)15. Which is one reason we should treat addiction as a public health issue, not a law enforcement one.
Rather than spending 60+ billion a year locking up otherwise nonviolent people for doing things with their bodies and nervous systems the 'we-know-betters' don't want them to, we could fund an awful lot of treatment on demand AND services for the homeless, etc.
Of course, if someone has some sort of philosophical inclination that prevents them from being able to grok that individuals are capable of making their own decisions, I suppose...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And what better way to say "society loves you" than a 10 year mandatory minimum drug sentence?
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2014
#8
and who said anything like that? fyi, where i live there are lots of drugs, to the detriment of
NewDeal_Dem
Dec 2014
#14
Which is one reason we should treat addiction as a public health issue, not a law enforcement one.
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2014
#15
And that bit of obvious snark came after "end the war on heroin and cocaine NOW"
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2014
#19
"growing epidemic" means "more money for the DEA to harass doctors into being terrified
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2014
#20
do you actually read the posts? that was posted in response to the other poster's
NewDeal_Dem
Dec 2014
#23
I have no moral panic, nor do I think we need tighter controls over people's behavior (except the
NewDeal_Dem
Dec 2014
#25
You aren't discussing, you're attacking, and reading your own agenda into everything I write.
NewDeal_Dem
Dec 2014
#27
How many of the the vicodin deaths come from acetominophen toxicity, vs. the opioid component?
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2014
#38
We should treat addiction as a public health issue, not a law enforcement one.
Warren DeMontague
Dec 2014
#5
Law enforcement is a crappy way to deal with social issues and that's why we love it. nt
bemildred
Dec 2014
#7
"California took a responsible step towards sanity this last November..."
nomorenomore08
Dec 2014
#32
Just stop throwing drug users in jail. That's all I would ask for, really.
nomorenomore08
Dec 2014
#33
I did object to the Social Darwinist aspect downthread, but otherwise I'm fairly indifferent
nomorenomore08
Dec 2014
#41
Well Wachovia laundered $378 billion of Cartel and was hit with $70 million fine
JonLP24
Dec 2014
#45
if I wanted to tar liberal positions on addictive recovery and opposition to the drug war
reddread
Dec 2014
#54
Throwing money at the problem which has failed to do anything about the problem
JonLP24
Dec 2014
#51
Dealers should be prosecuted. But simple possession should not be "criminal".
phleshdef
Dec 2014
#48