Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Sen. Bernie Sanders: "Please join me in vigorously opposing the #TPP trade agreement." [View all]RiverLover
(7,830 posts)41. He's not the only one to oppose it.
One of Senator Elizabeth Warrens top priorities since coming to Washington has been opening up ongoing international trade talks to public scrutinyshe has, on several occasions, criticized the secret nature of the negotiations, and has pressed the administrations trade representative directly about transparency.
On Wednesday night in DC, at Public Citizens annual gala, Warren spoke about the trade deals in some of her most direct remarks to date on the issueand revealed some inside details about the debate in Congress.
...From there, Warren launched a direct broadside on the trade deals, which would include the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement, and suggested it should be scuttled.
Think about that. Real people, people whose jobs are at stake, small-business owners who dont want to compete with overseas companies that dump their waste in rivers and hire workers for a dollar a daythose people, people without an army of lobbyiststhey would be opposed. I believe if people across this country would be opposed to a particular trade agreement, then maybe that trade agreement should not happen.
http://hanfordsentinel.com/news/opinion/columnists/we-need-more-than-elizabeth-warren-we-need-warrenism/article_dbf86135-499f-530f-82d1-6a39c1bc7416.html
On Wednesday night in DC, at Public Citizens annual gala, Warren spoke about the trade deals in some of her most direct remarks to date on the issueand revealed some inside details about the debate in Congress.
...From there, Warren launched a direct broadside on the trade deals, which would include the Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement, and suggested it should be scuttled.
Think about that. Real people, people whose jobs are at stake, small-business owners who dont want to compete with overseas companies that dump their waste in rivers and hire workers for a dollar a daythose people, people without an army of lobbyiststhey would be opposed. I believe if people across this country would be opposed to a particular trade agreement, then maybe that trade agreement should not happen.
http://hanfordsentinel.com/news/opinion/columnists/we-need-more-than-elizabeth-warren-we-need-warrenism/article_dbf86135-499f-530f-82d1-6a39c1bc7416.html
the TPP "could erode U.S. financial safeguards designed to prevent future financial crises." Tammy Badwin (D-WI) and Ed Markey (D-MA), neither of whom tried to help her stop the derivatives deregulation in the CRomnibus last week, both signed on to Warren's letter to U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman. "We cannot afford," they wrote. "a trade deal that undermines the governments ability to protect the American economy."
In her letter, Warren raises concerns that the deal could include provisions that would allow foreign companies to challenge U.S. policies before a judicial panel outside the domestic legal system, increasing exposure of American taxpayers to potential damages.
She also objects to potential provisions that she said would grant foreign companies access to U.S. markets without being subject to restrictions on predatory or toxic financial products and that would restrict the U.S. governments ability to impose capital controls, such as transaction taxes, on international firms.
http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2014/12/can-elizabeth-warren-bernie-sanders-and.html
In her letter, Warren raises concerns that the deal could include provisions that would allow foreign companies to challenge U.S. policies before a judicial panel outside the domestic legal system, increasing exposure of American taxpayers to potential damages.
She also objects to potential provisions that she said would grant foreign companies access to U.S. markets without being subject to restrictions on predatory or toxic financial products and that would restrict the U.S. governments ability to impose capital controls, such as transaction taxes, on international firms.
http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/2014/12/can-elizabeth-warren-bernie-sanders-and.html
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
111 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Sen. Bernie Sanders: "Please join me in vigorously opposing the #TPP trade agreement." [View all]
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
OP
I stand with Senator Sanders on this, and many other, issues! Run, Bernie. Run! n/t
CaliforniaPeggy
Dec 2014
#1
All his posts should! I wish the other Progressive Senators and Congressmen and women were
Dustlawyer
Dec 2014
#11
Yes, any Democrat worth the title should be out there supporting Sanders on this issue.
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#25
Bill Moyers has been spot on all year and then some. His interview with former Texas state
Dustlawyer
Dec 2014
#33
Someone's got to oppose Obama on it. Bernie may be the only one, though. The 1% wants it, REAL BAD!
blkmusclmachine
Dec 2014
#4
I don't know why Bernie, who isn't even a Democrat, should be the only one to oppose this.
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#26
That is good news, but still nowhere near enough to stop this from happening.
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#60
Those who engage in those kinds of distractions know they don't matter. They are simply trying
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#78
'A Corporate Coup D'etat'! Exactly. And yet, we see people claiming that 'we don't know what's in
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#15
About that Fast Track, if anyone here is a member of/fellow traveler with ANY of
genwah
Dec 2014
#27
One of the many reasons why I will not support her, even if she is the nominee. I will focus on
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#21
No, it's not a disclosure. I've said that openly from the day she voted for the neocon war which she
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#47
I stand with you. I made a pledge to never support any Democrat that betrayed their
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#55
Thank you rhett. I don't get the 'horror' that anyone would state the truth or that they should be
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#58
I think "they" want us to commit to "never supporting" HRC, so that if she wins the nomination, they
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#80
You guys think that you are soo very clever. But actually you are very transparent.
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#97
And this is your Pres Obama's administration. Tougher on whistle-blowers and journalists
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#107
I sure hope the Dem Party hasn't sunk to the level of threatening voters that
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#87
I think you are confusing me with someone else. I have never refused to answer such
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#88
It's interesting that no one, not Pres Obama or any of his supporters will argue the merits of
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#53
I assume that you would like to hold Boy Bush accountable for the lies he used to get
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#79
The Third Way/DLC changed the Dem Party from the Party of the Working Class to the Party of
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#19
Good question. And I don't know the answer. Why did Clinton approve of NAFTA?
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#24
All i can say to that is, the party obviously needs new strategists. They are out of touch with the
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#49
That's the wrong question. He is doing his part. The question is, 'what are WE the People going to
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#38
Is it? Where did you get that from? How about calling YOUR Rep and asking them to support
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#50
No, I'm saying that Senator Sanders (like Senator Franken, frankly) -- likes to talk..
X_Digger
Dec 2014
#51
That's it?? When the senate comes back in session, be could be on the floor throwing a cog in it.
X_Digger
Dec 2014
#89
He's using the mike he has to get information out to the people. How many Americans
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#65
Seems you're disparaging the ones that are at least speaking out. What are other reps doing?
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#77
So you are waiting for someone to lead? It's not his place. Join moveon.org, or DFA or another
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#91
I'm not waiting for anything. I'd like Bernie to join us and do more than yap! n/t
X_Digger
Dec 2014
#92
I am surprised I haven't put you on ignore before this. You have nothing to add here but
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#98
You feel free. And continue to finger wag at people who don't just pay lip service. n/t
X_Digger
Dec 2014
#101
I'm with him, and he can oppose it, but I don't see how any of us will even get a say about it.
ancianita
Dec 2014
#35
Very good information, thank you. We may have to depend on some Republicans opposing it also, as
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#63
"Fast-track doesn’t have support in the current Congress and won’t have support in the next Congress
pampango
Dec 2014
#71
What a great post. Should be an OP on its own. True, we are hoping that we can achieve
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#57
I don't know how they sleep at night. To be able to do so requires suppressing
sabrina 1
Dec 2014
#73