General Discussion

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)

8. I see it a different way.

Wed Dec 31, 2014, 01:56 PM

Dec 2014

Despite being the most expensive midterm in history, the turnout was lower than it has been in seventy years? Polling indicated that people were interested in issues, they wanted the candidates to talk about the economy. They wanted the candidates to discuss what is going on and what plans for the future the candidates held. They did not want propaganda, and they did not want assurances that the water running down their back was rain.

What was the core of the Democratic campaign plan? We suck, but we suck less than the Republicans. We had polling that showed the Republicans were were barely more popular than Herpes. But we didn't read the next line in the poll. We were only a couple points more popular than the Republicans. To most of the voters it came down to the ones who wanted to discuss the issues.

Republicans addressed the economy by opposing the job killing insert things here. Job Killing Minimum wage. Job killing Obamacare. They would have opposed the Job Killing Daylight Savings time if they could have gotten away with it.

We ran on the War on Women. Senator Udall was known as Senator Uterus. We didn't inspire people to vote for us, we ran a half assed campaign waiting, at first patiently, and then desperately for the Republicans to obligingly give us a Real Rape quote to campaign against. They learned from their defeats in 2012. We didn't learn.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

49 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So it's my imagination that people are PAID to disrupt us and convince us NOT to vote? [View all] randys1 Dec 2014 OP

Yes. n/t leeroysphitz Dec 2014 #1

Here in Oregon turnout was about 70%. Roughly twice the national average.... Bluenorthwest Dec 2014 #2

Doesn't Oregon have some kind of really practical and elaborate mail in voting system? eom Blanks Dec 2014 #15

Yes. And so do at least fredamae Dec 2014 #27

Practical and simple. Everyone votes by mail. Or you can use a drop box. Bluenorthwest Dec 2014 #31

Being a "Native Oregonian" fredamae Jan 2015 #49

Internet trolls keep voters home? LittleBlue Dec 2014 #3

I think there are people who are paid to disrupt and discourage people from voting notadmblnd Dec 2014 #4

Yep, no wonder the approval rating of congress is so low dissentient Dec 2014 #6

There are, to be sure. Igel Dec 2014 #5

No, randys1, it is not in your imagination. There are people who cheat and lie for money to win. Dont call me Shirley Dec 2014 #7

I see it a different way. Savannahmann Dec 2014 #8

I agree. Elections have bee dumbed down to... TreasonousBastard Dec 2014 #16

I don't know if they were paid but I had heard Rove had a bunch going and I Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #9

You are not going to get much support for those upaloopa Dec 2014 #10

Then they do not have a complaint. Thinkingabout Dec 2014 #11

Agreed. Bobbie Jo Dec 2014 #36

Nope no imagination... Historic NY Dec 2014 #12

One of the reasons politics is so negative is to disgust and turn off voters. It's effective. Scuba Dec 2014 #13

Negative ads work. former9thward Dec 2014 #20

Oh they work all right. In multiple ways. Scuba Dec 2014 #24

It's definitely not your imagination. Tarheel_Dem Dec 2014 #14

In the long run it's probably better for democrats... Blanks Dec 2014 #17

Hope you are right and it is all the more reason why you will see an extreme effort randys1 Dec 2014 #18

I will vote for Hillary if she's on the ballot... Blanks Dec 2014 #21

Maybe a "None of the Above" option and vote by mail would put them out of business. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2014 #19

Yes, please vive la commune Dec 2014 #38

Anybody that bases their decisions on anonymous internet postings is a weak-willed dimwit. Throd Dec 2014 #22

Many many many minions base votes on much less, all the time randys1 Dec 2014 #25

Yes mmonk Dec 2014 #23

Nope not your imagination. mstinamotorcity2 Dec 2014 #26

Nope. It's true. With the money that side has to throw around, I bet there's a paid troll calimary Dec 2014 #28

While I believe people are paid to do just that SomethingFishy Dec 2014 #29

Of course it works, the question is to what extent, otherwise they wouldnt do it randys1 Dec 2014 #30

Are you saying you might decide not to vote because a troll told you not to? SomethingFishy Dec 2014 #32

You BetterBelieveIt is not your imagination. great white snark Dec 2014 #33

Start with the thread posted asking of it's worth democrats winning at all Renew Deal Dec 2014 #34

Who is "us" in the sentence "PAID to disrupt us"? Are you speaking of DU? rhett o rick Dec 2014 #35

IDK who didnt vote from DU, neither do you unless you did a poll, I assume. randys1 Dec 2014 #40

You wrote "are PAID to disrupt us ". Are people paid to disrupt who? nm rhett o rick Dec 2014 #41

Can I presume we are all Democrats? If so, it is probably safe to say boston bean Jan 2015 #48

Blame voters AgingAmerican Dec 2014 #37

It may not be your imagination... ElboRuum Dec 2014 #39

No. Warren DeMontague Dec 2014 #42

Yes. Wall St is what disrupts our democracy. Not YouTube comments. raouldukelives Dec 2014 #43

I can't say for sure Jamaal510 Jan 2015 #44

I get the feeling there are people deliberately trying to convince the public that "the left" is Warren DeMontague Jan 2015 #45

Citizens United freed up an awful lot of money .. MinM Jan 2015 #46

here you go. wyldwolf Jan 2015 #47