General Discussion

dawg

(10,777 posts)

6. I agree.

Wed Dec 31, 2014, 03:42 PM

Dec 2014

Osama came out of the woodwork with a *scary* video, just in time to frighten enough voters back into the arms of the war party.

Click here to purchase valentine hearts!

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bernie Sanders"what we have to conclude,some people may not want to hear this,Bush won the election [View all] J_J_ Dec 2014 OP

The thought of another Bush as president makes me physically sick to my stomach. Initech Dec 2014 #1

Where do you work? grahamhgreen Dec 2014 #2

Two things, Bernie was not a Senator at that time and as we all know, it takes a Senator to Bluenorthwest Dec 2014 #3

Gore had already conceded at that point, IIRC. So while I obviously would have liked a KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #18

the OP is about 2004, not 2000 hfojvt Jan 2015 #34

Yes, but the post to which I was responding mentioned the 2000 election in its KingCharlemagne Jan 2015 #37

but hil supporteed gore strongly at that time elehhhhna Dec 2014 #24

I have always acknowledged that Bush legitimately won in 2004 bluestateguy Dec 2014 #4

I agree. dawg Dec 2014 #6

There were counties in Ohio that had marym625 Dec 2014 #5

Which ones? Recursion Dec 2014 #9

Oh my! marym625 Dec 2014 #11

Thanks! I looked for weeks when I first heard that, but that was a decade ago or so (nt) Recursion Dec 2014 #13

I have to run marym625 Dec 2014 #14

Actually, check Greg Palast's website marym625 Dec 2014 #15

stolen elections can cause a stir. Adam051188 Dec 2014 #7

Sorry, bullshite.. "Kerry would have been no different than bush". You really have to have your Cha Dec 2014 #26

Bush won 2004 fairly. Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2014 #8

Dean's campaign faltered because he got less than half as many delegates as Kerry in Iowa Recursion Dec 2014 #10

He and Kucinich were the only two willing to tell the (mostly) unvarnished truth KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #20

Maybe I don't remember it as well... Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2014 #23

All the print media chains did exhaustive analyses of the Florida vote and ballots after Bush KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #19

From your link. Dr Hobbitstein Dec 2014 #22

That is the general answer at the top of my source. The devil, as always, lies in the details (or in KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #25

Bush lost 2000. He actually lost Fla after the real count was finished. The USSC appointed bush. Dont call me Shirley Dec 2014 #31

Then trust the corporations. They care about you mmonk Dec 2014 #12

Tryin' something, are ya? Iggo Dec 2014 #16

+1 Dont call me Shirley Dec 2014 #32

I usually try to figure out why a particular op is made Doctor_J Jan 2015 #35

Amazing: Bernie Sanders agrees with me -- and with all the Ohio pols I've asked about this... brooklynite Dec 2014 #17

For once, you and I agree. (Whew!) Just out of curiosity, have any of your contacts explained KingCharlemagne Dec 2014 #21

SCOTUS called it for bush.. that's not winning. Months later below the fold in the NYT Gore did Cha Dec 2014 #27

Gore got more votes in 2004 than Bush did? arcane1 Dec 2014 #29

Sorry, I jumped in thinking about bush didn't win from the get-go.. he never would have been Cha Dec 2014 #30

Oh give me a fucking break already. arcane1 Dec 2014 #28

Well, Bush "won" the first one five to four....after that, with all the voter suppression and MADem Jan 2015 #33

WWHD? reddread Jan 2015 #36