Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
29. K&R.
Wed Dec 31, 2014, 05:47 PM
Dec 2014

The article tries to be a hit piece on Warren, but only endears her to me and other thinking Americans.

Law and financial firms are full of retreads from positions in the government. They use their knowledge of the fine print, convoluted language and tedious contradictions in our law to "help" their clients and screw the American people. (And I never use the word "screw" in polite or even impolite conversation so you know I am trying to express myself in the strongest language possible here.)

Why can't the administration hire a lawyer who specializes in defending or prosecuting on behalf of ordinary people say in civil courts for a change? Why do they always have to choose people for these top jobs who have never fought a bank, never challenged a corporation, never pursued a tax cheat? Why can't s certain share of these appointments be made to lawyers or other talented people who are fighters for a fair deal for all Americans?

Why do they always choose those who get rich defending, advising and supporting the tax cheats, the polluters, the poisoners and all the other numb defenders of the corrupt status quo? How about a little creativity in these appointments. Why not work toward a balance and a meeting of minds and interests between those who represent the very wealthy and those who represent the rest of the country -- the majority of citizens?

Why is our government, no matter who is in power, so utterly unresourceful, so utterly lacking in creativity and originality and research when making these awful, singularly unimaginative and unsatisfactory appointments? What is with these people? What is wrong with the Obama advisers who are making the same mistakes that presidents have made since FDR? Taking the easy comfortable route instead of including people who come from different backgrounds?

Shouldn't be all social reformers or people who looked into Wall Street and the banks and corporations from the outside. But shouldn't be such a corporate, Wall Street, banker heavy bunch either. How about some balance?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

K and a big R DrDan Dec 2014 #1
K and R (nt) bigwillq Dec 2014 #2
bbbut... tk2kewl Dec 2014 #3
He's working with Warren on this opposition, not endorsing her for 2016 RiverLover Dec 2014 #5
No, he's already been kissing Hillary's ass davidpdx Dec 2014 #7
I can see why you'd believe that given the media spin, however RiverLover Dec 2014 #8
I think it's mostly just a very negative feeling I have davidpdx Dec 2014 #10
LOL South Korea. How exciting! I'm a cord cutter here, no cable. So the spin I refer to is RiverLover Dec 2014 #12
"Al Franken endorses Hillary Clinton".. ".. I'm ready for Hillary".. Cha Dec 2014 #31
And there are other progressives against this...GOOD info on Maddow last night RiverLover Dec 2014 #4
That's my Senator! Puglover Dec 2014 #6
K & R !!! WillyT Dec 2014 #9
What is Obama thinking?.... Helen Borg Dec 2014 #11
One word MONEY RunInCircles Dec 2014 #13
Same thing he was thinking with Lawrence Summers and Geithner and Pritzker etc. progressoid Dec 2014 #20
I was at Harvard when Larry was Prez there. Such an embarrassment. Helen Borg Dec 2014 #27
He was something else, going after Cornel West for trivial issues and the bizarre comment about appalachiablue Jan 2015 #32
K and R for our junior senator! geardaddy Dec 2014 #14
Very misleading headline from a right wing website. JohnnyRingo Dec 2014 #15
I got Franken's email & did a search in google news. The front page talked about Cheney's war crimes RiverLover Dec 2014 #17
You're right, that's better. JohnnyRingo Dec 2014 #23
That's what I say re: no one expected Obama to get the nom until late in the game. RiverLover Dec 2014 #26
I was gonna point out the same thing d_legendary1 Dec 2014 #18
This message was self-deleted by its author jwirr Dec 2014 #16
Who is 'Amy'? RiverLover Dec 2014 #22
This message was self-deleted by its author jwirr Dec 2014 #25
Speaking of unwanted nominees aspirant Dec 2014 #19
I haven't heard anything, sadly. RiverLover Dec 2014 #21
While endorsing Hillary Goldman Sachs Clinton? Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2014 #24
Kicked and recommended a whole bunch! Enthusiast Dec 2014 #28
K&R. JDPriestly Dec 2014 #29
Good.... supercats Dec 2014 #30
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Al Franken joins Elizabet...»Reply #29