Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Election 2016: Hillary Must Sever All Ties to Obama’s Economic Team [View all]Cha
(319,173 posts)153. Maybe it's the same one? lol or there's more than one of them out there who shouldn't be on juries.
And, are of the same calibre who wouldn't like you and Nance.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
168 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Election 2016: Hillary Must Sever All Ties to Obama’s Economic Team [View all]
WillTwain
Dec 2014
OP
Not at all. she is the presumptive candidate. I think we can win with any of a variety of candidates
WillTwain
Dec 2014
#8
You are way off on this. You seem to want H. Clinton to tell you she supports unions
rhett o rick
Dec 2014
#51
Better a bullet to the head under Republicans, than a slow death by a thousand paper cuts.
Katashi_itto
Dec 2014
#13
not sure I'm understanding you...you mean you'd rather vote for a Republican than HC
Sheepshank
Dec 2014
#18
whatever shall we do without your usual unwavering supporrt for democrats?
arely staircase
Jan 2015
#75
That is fallacious reasoniing, reminiscent of the German Communist Party in
KingCharlemagne
Dec 2014
#31
If you think Democrats can win without union support, you have not canvassed or worked on a
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#93
I had alot of people screaming on DU that not voting for her was being a traitor to the
Katashi_itto
Dec 2014
#15
SCOTUS seats, not unions, will play the most important part in my decision to vote in 2016.
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#78
Have you ever actually volunteered, made calls and walked precincts for Democrats?
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#94
You've misread my post (wouldn't be the first time, JD), but I wasn't knocking unions. I"m
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#99
Nothing in your post applies to me or my original post. Again, my argument centers
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#108
Great. If you are SEIU, you are one of the people who comes out when elections are near.
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#127
" . . . in part thanks to the lack of Democratic support for unions . . . "
Major Hogwash
Jan 2015
#161
If she wins the primaries, then yes, if you don't vote for her after the majority of Dems
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#77
Yes, we need to reject "the lesser of two evils" but NOT in a general election.
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#111
How cute! But seriously, you should look up the definition of the word rather than some YouTube
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#128
I didn't post a YouTube video like some clueless teenager, so how should I "take my own advice"?.
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#155
Um...take a look at your response to my original comment and then get back to me
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#165
I will ask you what I have asked others who do not understand the importance of union support
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#95
Trumka gave a good speech recently in Missouri....I recommend reading or watching it in full
Bluenorthwest
Dec 2014
#17
LOL! The only thing Hillary has going for is whatever ties she can get to Obama.
True Blue Door
Dec 2014
#35
She voted for the Iraq War. She enthusiastically championed the Iraq War.
True Blue Door
Dec 2014
#37
And cut off her main revenue stream, both for her campaign and her personal finances?
Doctor_J
Dec 2014
#41
My closest and best friends criticize me much more often than acquaintances.
LanternWaste
Mar 2015
#168
Richard, her neolib Roladex has a deeper bench than her husband's retreads
TheKentuckian
Dec 2014
#47
Of course to drive you do have to win elections but you can never lose track of the being a means
TheKentuckian
Dec 2014
#54
And President Obama has done an incredible job changing lives for the better
BlueCaliDem
Jan 2015
#157
"I think that Hillary did an excellent job as secretary of state. I think she is very, very
Cha
Dec 2014
#62
Here is a link to the story. Read it and weep. it cannot be any clearer. Sorry.
WillTwain
Dec 2014
#65
What is your trip? Did you read it? Did you listen to the girl? They are done with Obama's economic team.
WillTwain
Dec 2014
#71
I am tired of the childish ankle biting. Did you read the article. The first word are clear as hell.
WillTwain
Jan 2015
#73
If you're so tired of "childish ankle biting" then you should really act as role model and practice
Cha
Jan 2015
#166
I'd like to see unions take it a step farther using ALL political funds to develop labor candidates.
pa28
Dec 2014
#57
What a silly thing to say. What are the unions going to do? Wait until she's elected to find out
Autumn
Dec 2014
#64
Maybe it's the same one? lol or there's more than one of them out there who shouldn't be on juries.
Cha
Jan 2015
#153
Damn, everything was going so good,too. The Ducks won big. Where is the wine?
WillTwain
Jan 2015
#154
and when labor went for Reagan how did that work out for them? In fact labor is started going
still_one
Jan 2015
#87
Anyone who has ever partgicipated in a Democratic campaign on the ground in the final
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#92
Some people have short memories. Union membership has been in decline and I am very sorry
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#144
Trumka is betting that he still has enough muscle to swing this election. Without unions dems are in
WillTwain
Jan 2015
#145
I am a union member in retirement, give a lot of credit to unions, was a job steward for years, took
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#146
The unions worked hard for everyone to have minimun wage increases and so many issues which
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#148