Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
4. Note to DU (especially those who run it):
Fri Jan 2, 2015, 04:46 PM
Jan 2015

This is what comes of worshipping the letter 'D' and not the principles of someone like, say, FDR.

There's been LOTS of complicity on this site.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Sen Sanders Says No to TPP – Why Do Conservative Dems Say Yes? rhett o rick Jan 2015 #1
A conservative dem is a fantasy. A conservative dem is a republican Autumn Jan 2015 #2
Thank you, Autumn MissDeeds Jan 2015 #35
I am so sick of moderate republicans hiding behind a magic D. They can call themselves Autumn Jan 2015 #37
I could not agree more. MissDeeds Jan 2015 #42
+ a kabillion. nt Mojorabbit Jan 2015 #101
+1 whereisjustice Jan 2015 #23
Since when did America get virtuous and all about what it does to other countries economically? Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #30
Each of those points will be happening to AMERICANS. djean111 Jan 2015 #40
You raise an interesting issue. Country of origin labelling for meat is being used by America to Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #43
I want to know where the meat comes from. Or I don't buy it, period. djean111 Jan 2015 #46
Thanks for the link! PearliePoo2 Jan 2015 #152
Gee, and I thought your real point was that no one should merrily Jan 2015 #65
No telling what folks will label other folks with. Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #67
Didn't label you with anything, just pointed out merrily Jan 2015 #70
Meat labeling changes is another whine nilesobek Jan 2015 #111
The system required to track each piece of beef is expensive. Instead of guessing the cost, ask Fred Sanders Jan 2015 #113
I'm only talking about country of origin labeling right now. nilesobek Jan 2015 #117
It's not costly to label it. It's costly to produce it in the US, under minimal standards of NewDeal_Dem Jan 2015 #104
A uniform safety code is no value if the safety codes in some countries are not enforced. JDPriestly Jan 2015 #95
What's your beef with valid points? merrily Jan 2015 #63
Thank you. I'm disgusted at the number of people here on DU who Nay Jan 2015 #120
You're welcome. merrily Jan 2015 #148
Totally DISAGREE With Your Reasoning About WHY ChiciB1 Jan 2015 #91
WHAT'S YOUR PIECE HAVE TO DO WITH TPP? WE HAVE A REAL THREAT ABOUT TO BE UNLEASHED. INFORM. drynberg Jan 2015 #118
I admire you loyalty sulphurdunn Jan 2015 #123
Glad you asked but surprised that you needed. The TPP will cause extreme harm to the 99%. rhett o rick Jan 2015 #146
Check this out... L0oniX Jan 2015 #145
This message was self-deleted by its author Corruption Inc Jan 2015 #3
Note to DU (especially those who run it): FiveGoodMen Jan 2015 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jan 2015 #7
Well said. n/t crim son Jan 2015 #10
You think they give a shit about the complicity? L0oniX Jan 2015 #20
voting only means that you approve of the oligarchy system that doesn't really give a fuck about us. NewDeal_Dem Jan 2015 #107
So don't vote already. Hekate Jan 2015 #108
Enjoy your voting for the oligarchy. L0oniX Jan 2015 #154
Voting IS the oligarchy's system! Brought to you by Diebold™! DeSwiss Jan 2015 #110
You know very well that "Underground" refers to our place during the BushCheney regime... Hekate Jan 2015 #109
It doesn't say we have to vote for poseurs, people pretending to be Democrats. Democrats sabrina 1 Jan 2015 #142
I'll vote for a REAL DEMOCRAT! L0oniX Jan 2015 #155
I think this is a ToS violation, or at least a call to abandon the franchise; but, ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #119
Has this person answered yet? Pretty irresponsible to make that statement and then walk away randys1 Jan 2015 #126
Nope ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #128
I can understand ignoring you, you seem to ask uncomfortable questions all the time, who in the heck randys1 Jan 2015 #130
LOL ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #132
yes. ellenrr Jan 2015 #25
And very interestingly - a pro-Keystone Pipeline ad is now on the truedelphi Jan 2015 #31
The site admins don't chose the ads placed. Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2015 #137
Very good to know. truedelphi Jan 2015 #140
Screen cap it if you can... Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2015 #141
it's exhibit A AtomicKitten Jan 2015 #36
To be fair . . . markpkessinger Jan 2015 #49
Critical or factually accurate? merrily Jan 2015 #81
Both markpkessinger Jan 2015 #84
I wasn't referring to the site admins at all. merrily Jan 2015 #85
The post I originally replied to was titled, "Note to DU (especially those who run it)" markpkessinger Jan 2015 #86
Thanks. "Especially" is not a synonym for "exclusively;" and the 3 admins are by no means all merrily Jan 2015 #153
Yep. 840high Jan 2015 #55
Exactly. The FFs warned against party politics and we are seeing now what they sabrina 1 Jan 2015 #66
If you believe the FFs warned against party politics, then a Dem forum is about fighting the FFs muriel_volestrangler Jan 2015 #131
'Warned against' meaning they predicted that political parites would sabrina 1 Jan 2015 #144
who does that? VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #72
Lol! Katashi_itto Jan 2015 #114
What did they tell you about why they were ardent devotees? That is the story of the answer to your TheKentuckian Jan 2015 #149
No I asked YOU....they are both dead....WHAT do YOU mean... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #162
Why are you going to ask a stranger about the motivations of your relations? TheKentuckian Jan 2015 #164
I am not going to ask that.....I am ASKING why YOU think being a loyal Democrat.... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2015 #165
You inspired me to say this... MrMickeysMom Jan 2015 #79
A lot of complicity indeed. And it gets more obvious day by day. NewDeal_Dem Jan 2015 #105
Principles like locking up Japanese Americans in Dr Hobbitstein Jan 2015 #138
k & fucking r! n/t wildbilln864 Jan 2015 #5
Take a look at my 'toon at the top of "GOOD READS." gregcrawford Jan 2015 #6
But..but..some of those CEOs give money to the party that wants money out of politics! Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2015 #8
Strangely, it may be the the Party of No (R) that puts the brakes on TPP progressoid Jan 2015 #9
Strange bedfellows indeed... daleanime Jan 2015 #17
The GOP is working hard with Obama to ram TPP through brentspeak Jan 2015 #134
How dare you! kentuck Jan 2015 #11
Link, please, to President Obama's quote about TPP rainbows and unicorns. blue neen Jan 2015 #12
Really--i'd like to see it, too....and gee, did we miss the SENATE VOTE on the TPP? MADem Jan 2015 #27
No, it has to be agreed to by the White House and then submitted to the Senate for ratification. former9thward Jan 2015 #44
From here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6032129 Maedhros Jan 2015 #32
RE: Editorial Sarcasm blue neen Jan 2015 #58
Agreed. Maedhros Jan 2015 #74
heated between.... paleotn Jan 2015 #82
I posted elsewhere a theory I'm formulating: Maedhros Jan 2015 #89
What is disingenuous about the OP? Do you doubt that the OP sincerely objects strongly to Obama's merrily Jan 2015 #76
Actually, I did not know full well that it did not exist. blue neen Jan 2015 #99
What on earth makes you think I feel threatened by your posts? merrily Jan 2015 #151
Did you even follow the link provided? paleotn Jan 2015 #80
Actually, I did. blue neen Jan 2015 #100
"opponents are ignorant of the benefits of trade" paleotn Jan 2015 #77
Hyperbole is both an acceptable device in writing and widely-recognized by readers. merrily Jan 2015 #73
That's true. blue neen Jan 2015 #103
Taking a subject seriously or asking for clarification are both different from asking for a link, merrily Jan 2015 #150
I believe he stated that those who oppose this disaster are 'ignorant' of sabrina 1 Jan 2015 #143
I'd love to find out what the corporations want from TPP. L0oniX Jan 2015 #156
My new year prediction is . . . the administration's pile of TPP horse manure will grow ever larger. pa28 Jan 2015 #13
why would he? why would the party deviate from its current path? MisterP Jan 2015 #14
We must invest wisely aspirant Jan 2015 #24
Will make them more likely to listen hughee99 Jan 2015 #127
When they reveal their true colors aspirant Jan 2015 #135
K&R.... daleanime Jan 2015 #15
K & R !!! WillyT Jan 2015 #16
Vote Hillary! UNDER EITHER PARTY WE GET A 1ST WORLD VERSION OF SOMALIA Katashi_itto Jan 2015 #18
And... the jury is back. hedda_foil Jan 2015 #19
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jan 2015 #21
A pathetic alert. They are getting desperate to shut out the truth. L0oniX Jan 2015 #22
REALLY desperate Skittles Jan 2015 #97
I think "shut the fuck up" *is* inappropriate and disrespectful BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #26
Obama is, essentially, telling US to "sit down and shut the fuck up." Maedhros Jan 2015 #33
I don't disagree that the President and Rahm have all told liberals to STFU BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #34
If it were my OP, I would have chosen other words simply to avoid the semantic argument altogether. Maedhros Jan 2015 #50
Yes, especially on this board, the language will be discussed, not the policy BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #53
TPP is wrong, disrespect of Obama is not new, here or anywhere. I think TPP is his payback randys1 Jan 2015 #54
Agreed BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #56
For them to NOT make the deal, they have to be elected President, right? randys1 Jan 2015 #60
I don't know the answer BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #62
Great you mention that, I remember hearing him say on "hardball" special edition college randys1 Jan 2015 #64
Well said! (nt) paleotn Jan 2015 #83
It's appropriate. 840high Jan 2015 #57
I'm not saying the post should be hidden and I do think it's important to fight the TPP BrotherIvan Jan 2015 #61
He got our vote ...and that's enough respect. L0oniX Jan 2015 #157
I am grateful to this jury. Curmudgeoness Jan 2015 #39
I thank this jury also. I personally don't think the language is necessary but I also rhett o rick Jan 2015 #52
Excellent. 840high Jan 2015 #59
yes, good jury decision, but what an asshole move to alert in the first place, ellenrr Jan 2015 #112
Dear President Obama: if the TPP is so wonderful why the dark cloak of secrecy? 99th_Monkey Jan 2015 #28
Because the oligarchy runs the show. L0oniX Jan 2015 #158
Looks like the megacorps are gonna get their way. Jester Messiah Jan 2015 #29
Grayson is out talking about this provision: SomethingFishy Jan 2015 #38
Excuse my ignorance oldlib2 Jan 2015 #41
There is really no excuse for your ignorance about the TPP, if you are going to post about it, djean111 Jan 2015 #47
I now know what TPP means. oldlib2 Jan 2015 #78
Educate Yourself before you post something. This is not a faith based message board. Tommymac Jan 2015 #75
"faith based message board" LMFAO L0oniX Jan 2015 #88
Dear President Obama, Please shut the f' up about TPP rainbows and unicorns... 48lowes Jan 2015 #139
Compromise is how 10 million people moved into poverty during this administration. jtuck004 Jan 2015 #90
INFORM YOURSELF ABOUT THE TERRIBLE TPP, NO EXCUSES. ACT. drynberg Jan 2015 #116
K&R! This post should have hundreds of recommendations! Enthusiast Jan 2015 #45
link to the rainbows and unicorns stonecutter357 Jan 2015 #48
K & R Thespian2 Jan 2015 #51
Shut the what up? I am not familiar with your posts, if you show respect to Obama randys1 Jan 2015 #68
Democrats are hostile to labor because we don't hold them accountable. fbc Jan 2015 #69
"You can smell it from here to Vietnam"... SidDithers Jan 2015 #71
TPP is a job killing, wealth sucking device to move wages/benefits from American workers into the blkmusclmachine Jan 2015 #87
Freedom of speech and all that treestar Jan 2015 #92
Kick....for all the great links & info above on this thread. here's a few more~ RiverLover Jan 2015 #93
+1, thanks for these whereisjustice Jan 2015 #94
I APPROVE OF THIS MESSAGE Skittles Jan 2015 #96
Over $400 mill has already been paid out to corps in a series of investor-state FTA cases RiverLover Jan 2015 #98
And so many of the good liberals here are on board with the cardboard shack too. NewDeal_Dem Jan 2015 #102
Gee, I gave it a rec and it stayed at 149. Whis is that? TheNutcracker Jan 2015 #106
It will also render powerless every evironmental protection regulation . . . another_liberal Jan 2015 #115
Sadly we are far, very far from mainstream Democrats here. raouldukelives Jan 2015 #121
Like labor unions? 150 Democratic house members last year? All the people ag NAFTA? RiverLover Jan 2015 #122
While the people pushing it may be in the minority. The ones funding the pushers exist on both sides raouldukelives Jan 2015 #147
100% Agreed! raindaddy Jan 2015 #124
As long as they believe fredamae Jan 2015 #129
Here's what Obama promised~ RiverLover Jan 2015 #125
When I was campaigning for Obama in '08 Jakes Progress Jan 2015 #133
We share the same story, Jakes Progress RiverLover Jan 2015 #136
Whatchu got against unicorns? Nuclear Unicorn Jan 2015 #159
What is TPP? ann--- Jan 2015 #160
CEO's get pockets lined here too ramprat63 Jan 2015 #161
Jeez, all I wanted was a pony, they got unicorns now? hughee99 Jan 2015 #163
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dear President Obama, Ple...»Reply #4