Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Dear President Obama, Please shut the f' up about TPP rainbows and unicorns... [View all]Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)67. No telling what folks will label other folks with.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
165 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Dear President Obama, Please shut the f' up about TPP rainbows and unicorns... [View all]
whereisjustice
Jan 2015
OP
I am so sick of moderate republicans hiding behind a magic D. They can call themselves
Autumn
Jan 2015
#37
Since when did America get virtuous and all about what it does to other countries economically?
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#30
You raise an interesting issue. Country of origin labelling for meat is being used by America to
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#43
The system required to track each piece of beef is expensive. Instead of guessing the cost, ask
Fred Sanders
Jan 2015
#113
It's not costly to label it. It's costly to produce it in the US, under minimal standards of
NewDeal_Dem
Jan 2015
#104
A uniform safety code is no value if the safety codes in some countries are not enforced.
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#95
WHAT'S YOUR PIECE HAVE TO DO WITH TPP? WE HAVE A REAL THREAT ABOUT TO BE UNLEASHED. INFORM.
drynberg
Jan 2015
#118
Glad you asked but surprised that you needed. The TPP will cause extreme harm to the 99%.
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#146
voting only means that you approve of the oligarchy system that doesn't really give a fuck about us.
NewDeal_Dem
Jan 2015
#107
You know very well that "Underground" refers to our place during the BushCheney regime...
Hekate
Jan 2015
#109
It doesn't say we have to vote for poseurs, people pretending to be Democrats. Democrats
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#142
I think this is a ToS violation, or at least a call to abandon the franchise; but, ...
1StrongBlackMan
Jan 2015
#119
Has this person answered yet? Pretty irresponsible to make that statement and then walk away
randys1
Jan 2015
#126
I can understand ignoring you, you seem to ask uncomfortable questions all the time, who in the heck
randys1
Jan 2015
#130
The post I originally replied to was titled, "Note to DU (especially those who run it)"
markpkessinger
Jan 2015
#86
Thanks. "Especially" is not a synonym for "exclusively;" and the 3 admins are by no means all
merrily
Jan 2015
#153
Exactly. The FFs warned against party politics and we are seeing now what they
sabrina 1
Jan 2015
#66
If you believe the FFs warned against party politics, then a Dem forum is about fighting the FFs
muriel_volestrangler
Jan 2015
#131
What did they tell you about why they were ardent devotees? That is the story of the answer to your
TheKentuckian
Jan 2015
#149
Why are you going to ask a stranger about the motivations of your relations?
TheKentuckian
Jan 2015
#164
I am not going to ask that.....I am ASKING why YOU think being a loyal Democrat....
VanillaRhapsody
Jan 2015
#165
But..but..some of those CEOs give money to the party that wants money out of politics!
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jan 2015
#8
Really--i'd like to see it, too....and gee, did we miss the SENATE VOTE on the TPP?
MADem
Jan 2015
#27
No, it has to be agreed to by the White House and then submitted to the Senate for ratification.
former9thward
Jan 2015
#44
From here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6032129
Maedhros
Jan 2015
#32
What is disingenuous about the OP? Do you doubt that the OP sincerely objects strongly to Obama's
merrily
Jan 2015
#76
Hyperbole is both an acceptable device in writing and widely-recognized by readers.
merrily
Jan 2015
#73
Taking a subject seriously or asking for clarification are both different from asking for a link,
merrily
Jan 2015
#150
My new year prediction is . . . the administration's pile of TPP horse manure will grow ever larger.
pa28
Jan 2015
#13
I don't disagree that the President and Rahm have all told liberals to STFU
BrotherIvan
Jan 2015
#34
If it were my OP, I would have chosen other words simply to avoid the semantic argument altogether.
Maedhros
Jan 2015
#50
Yes, especially on this board, the language will be discussed, not the policy
BrotherIvan
Jan 2015
#53
TPP is wrong, disrespect of Obama is not new, here or anywhere. I think TPP is his payback
randys1
Jan 2015
#54
Great you mention that, I remember hearing him say on "hardball" special edition college
randys1
Jan 2015
#64
I'm not saying the post should be hidden and I do think it's important to fight the TPP
BrotherIvan
Jan 2015
#61
I thank this jury also. I personally don't think the language is necessary but I also
rhett o rick
Jan 2015
#52
yes, good jury decision, but what an asshole move to alert in the first place,
ellenrr
Jan 2015
#112
Dear President Obama: if the TPP is so wonderful why the dark cloak of secrecy?
99th_Monkey
Jan 2015
#28
There is really no excuse for your ignorance about the TPP, if you are going to post about it,
djean111
Jan 2015
#47
Educate Yourself before you post something. This is not a faith based message board.
Tommymac
Jan 2015
#75
Dear President Obama, Please shut the f' up about TPP rainbows and unicorns...
48lowes
Jan 2015
#139
Compromise is how 10 million people moved into poverty during this administration.
jtuck004
Jan 2015
#90
Shut the what up? I am not familiar with your posts, if you show respect to Obama
randys1
Jan 2015
#68
TPP is a job killing, wealth sucking device to move wages/benefits from American workers into the
blkmusclmachine
Jan 2015
#87
Kick....for all the great links & info above on this thread. here's a few more~
RiverLover
Jan 2015
#93
Over $400 mill has already been paid out to corps in a series of investor-state FTA cases
RiverLover
Jan 2015
#98
And so many of the good liberals here are on board with the cardboard shack too.
NewDeal_Dem
Jan 2015
#102
It will also render powerless every evironmental protection regulation . . .
another_liberal
Jan 2015
#115
Like labor unions? 150 Democratic house members last year? All the people ag NAFTA?
RiverLover
Jan 2015
#122
While the people pushing it may be in the minority. The ones funding the pushers exist on both sides
raouldukelives
Jan 2015
#147