Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: You might have to work forever: The honest reality about Social Security and retirement [View all]n2doc
(47,953 posts)35. Tom Friedman (aka the 'stache of freedom), David Brooks, George Will
Basically the punditocracy in DC and New York.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
103 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You might have to work forever: The honest reality about Social Security and retirement [View all]
xchrom
Jan 2015
OP
Spoiled and lazy I see...just kidding, a very funny response you have there. and probably true
randys1
Jan 2015
#28
People like to say that, but the reality is that if health problems don't take you out
CTyankee
Jan 2015
#6
Interesting point. Because that also means that you will have to work for lowerer
GoneFishin
Jan 2015
#13
There is good news on that front, I think...Since the Koch bros want you working till you die, they
randys1
Jan 2015
#29
You better hope it isnt a loser in the end, though, especially if you are a minority of any kind
randys1
Jan 2015
#38
A better pitch and relentless effort to back it up are a better hope investment.
TheKentuckian
Jan 2015
#51
Give Dems a candidate to vote for who will deal with employers who discriminate based on age
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#83
i already know i'll work till i die. i do have a profession i can do sitting on my ass
KG
Jan 2015
#3
Oh, but you'll downsize. I've already faced that situation. I'm looking for a place to
CTyankee
Jan 2015
#37
First you are talking about Social Security and then pensions. Aren't they two different things?
jwirr
Jan 2015
#7
Practically every retirement plan out there didn't factor in life extension.
TampaAnimusVortex
Jan 2015
#8
The TPP will delay the time in which drugs go generic. I susupect that is the reason that
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#84
There has been some discussion of increasing the maximun amount of salary which FICA is taken.
Thinkingabout
Jan 2015
#9
And once again we are told things (like retirement and universal HC) are impossible to maintain
n2doc
Jan 2015
#11
+100. Millionaire writers who write these things don't want their own taxes raised.
closeupready
Jan 2015
#23
Don't worry. Your employers will force you out when you get into your 50s. nt
LiberalEsto
Jan 2015
#18
The baby boomers funded their SS...was the reasoning behind raising the SS payroll tax
SammyWinstonJack
Jan 2015
#27
During the Reagan era, Social Security taxes were raised on baby boomers so that the baby
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#86
Corporate CEOs can retire anytime, generations of their families never have to work,
whereisjustice
Jan 2015
#20
My wife and I just retired in June. She is 46 and I am 44. We have never had taxable income over
kelly1mm
Jan 2015
#55
I agree that the 'no kids' factor was probably the biggest single reason we were able to
kelly1mm
Jan 2015
#73
You're right, but there was no "golden age" for retirement income hereabouts
HardLineDem
Jan 2015
#40
The reality is that older workers face terrible discrimiination in the workplace.
JDPriestly
Jan 2015
#87
And just what does the author think will happen to unemployment if people work an extra decade?
strategery blunder
Jan 2015
#45
I'm just saying the idea and existence of "retirement" is relatively new and could only exist in
Omnith
Jan 2015
#59
They're really not, but people in agrarian societies breed their retirement plan.
LeftyMom
Jan 2015
#71
This book is written on the cherished premise that the Social Security cap must not be raised. nt
djean111
Jan 2015
#85
Life expectancy is not rising significantly, except in a few small subgroups.
raging moderate
Jan 2015
#102