Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
13. yep, "How (Wachovia) laundered billions from Mexico's murderous drug gangs "
Sun Jan 4, 2015, 11:49 AM
Jan 2015

Funny how corporate media keeps us largely in the dark about these things.

How a big US bank laundered billions from Mexico's murderous drug gangs
Apr 2011

...The authorities uncovered billions of dollars in wire transfers, traveller's cheques and cash shipments through Mexican exchanges into Wachovia accounts. Wachovia was put under immediate investigation for failing to maintain an effective anti-money laundering programme.

...In March 2010, Wachovia settled the biggest action brought under the US bank secrecy act, through the US district court in Miami. Now that the year's "deferred prosecution" has expired, the bank is in effect in the clear. It paid federal authorities $110m in forfeiture, for allowing transactions later proved to be connected to drug smuggling, and incurred a $50m fine for failing to monitor cash used to ship 22 tons of cocaine.

More shocking, and more important, the bank was sanctioned for failing to apply the proper anti-laundering strictures to the transfer of $378.4bn – a sum equivalent to one-third of Mexico's gross national product – into dollar accounts from so-called casas de cambio (CDCs) in Mexico, currency exchange houses with which the bank did business.

"Wachovia's blatant disregard for our banking laws gave international cocaine cartels a virtual carte blanche to finance their operations," said Jeffrey Sloman, the federal prosecutor. Yet the total fine was less than 2% of the bank's $12.3bn profit for 2009. On 24 March 2010, Wells Fargo stock traded at $30.86 – up 1% on the week of the court settlement....

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/apr/03/us-bank-mexico-drug-gangs


So by only paying a large fine to the US govt, not only is Wachovia/Wells Fargo complicit in drug smuggling & profiting from it, so is the US govt.

And the beat goes on.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Dam the Torpedos and bully for Sen. Warren nolabels Jan 2015 #1
Money should have no seat at all Demeter Jan 2015 #2
Amen.... daleanime Jan 2015 #4
Like water and food or night and day.......... nolabels Jan 2015 #15
+1 Enthusiast Jan 2015 #18
And this is why "Wall Street braces for Warren run" RiverLover Jan 2015 #3
Not only do they launder 378 billion - Wachovia JonLP24 Jan 2015 #6
yep, "How (Wachovia) laundered billions from Mexico's murderous drug gangs " RiverLover Jan 2015 #13
K&R.... daleanime Jan 2015 #5
Why does she hate Obama? ybbor Jan 2015 #7
She doesn'thate (President) Obama ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #9
I'm pretty sure ybbor forgot the sarcasm smiley tavalon Jan 2015 #24
heh SammyWinstonJack Jan 2015 #11
I'll say it again ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #8
He's being paid a $22 million bonus from the bank he works for if he gets this job at Treasury. RiverLover Jan 2015 #10
I suspect it's the bank hedging its bet ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #12
And what's the down side for him when he fails? A very lucrative job for Wall Street? rhett o rick Jan 2015 #16
Question ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #17
Correct me if I misunderstand your insinuation, but you seem to be suggesting that rhett o rick Jan 2015 #23
Do you know any governmental workers? ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #30
See clearly the problem is that there aren't enough Wall Streeters in government... PoliticAverse Jan 2015 #27
Are there no Progressive Dems without that questionable history and without the bribe money sabrina 1 Jan 2015 #25
Elizabefh Warren... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2015 #31
The people claimed to be selected for "knowing where the bodies are buried" don't seem overly TheKentuckian Jan 2015 #14
Thanks for the laugh -- though you didn't intend it. n/t brentspeak Jan 2015 #20
Dumbest post of 2015 so far. Holy shit Doctor_J Jan 2015 #21
And unfortunately, we've got two more years of this to go. brentspeak Jan 2015 #22
By that logic, John Gotti should be in the cabinet - probably AG Doctor_J Jan 2015 #32
Good point. All of Obama's other nominees from Wall Street have worked out pretty well MannyGoldstein Jan 2015 #26
Kicked and recommended! Enthusiast Jan 2015 #19
K&R liberal_at_heart Jan 2015 #28
Good for her. AtomicKitten Jan 2015 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why Senate Dems Led by Li...»Reply #13