Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Showing Original Post only (View all)How Quickly Did Fukushima Radiation Reach North America, and When Will it Peak? [View all]
http://www.techtimes.com/articles/24309/20150102/how-quickly-did-fukushima-radiation-reach-north-america-and-when-will-it-peak.htmScientists have released the results of a study on just how long it took the radioactive elements released from Japan's Fukushima nuclear plant into the ocean by the 2001 earthquake and tsunami to reach the west coast of North America.
Cesium 137 and cesium 134 that spilled into the waters of the Pacific ocean from the damaged Fukushima Daiichi plant took about 2.1 years to show up in measurable amounts on the shores of North American, Canadian researchers report in the Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences.
Snip
By June 2013 the radiation had reached Canada's continental shelf, the researchers say.
However, the amount of radiation detected was small, they say -- below 1 Becquerels per cubic meter. (A Becquerel is the number of radioactive decades event per second for each 260 gallons of water.)
That level is at least 1,000 lower than what the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency considered acceptable in drinking water.
It is also lower than the levels present in the Pacific Ocean in the 1980s due to fallout from testing of nuclear weapons, the researchers point out.
Cesium 137 and cesium 134 that spilled into the waters of the Pacific ocean from the damaged Fukushima Daiichi plant took about 2.1 years to show up in measurable amounts on the shores of North American, Canadian researchers report in the Proceeding of the National Academy of Sciences.
Snip
By June 2013 the radiation had reached Canada's continental shelf, the researchers say.
However, the amount of radiation detected was small, they say -- below 1 Becquerels per cubic meter. (A Becquerel is the number of radioactive decades event per second for each 260 gallons of water.)
That level is at least 1,000 lower than what the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency considered acceptable in drinking water.
It is also lower than the levels present in the Pacific Ocean in the 1980s due to fallout from testing of nuclear weapons, the researchers point out.
Don't be deceived by doomers who pretend to know something about science. And don't listen to dumbass conspiracies that governments are hiding the effects of the Fukushima disaster. Real scientists are doing real science, and publishing their results.
And those results tell us that while The effects from Fukushima should not be minimized, they should also not be wildly exaggerated. Fukushima was bad enough without having to make shit up to make it seem worse.
Sid
71 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Quickly Did Fukushima Radiation Reach North America, and When Will it Peak? [View all]
SidDithers
Jan 2015
OP
I read this 10 years ago when I hitched a ride with the time traveling radiation.
zappaman
Jan 2015
#2
....Yeah- I caught that, too. 2001- so not as quickly as we thought, huh?
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2015
#8
Well, AFAIC we're all on the same team. At least I am. Fukushima was and is a clusterfuck.
Warren DeMontague
Jan 2015
#42
well, then, let's just build us some more "nucular plants"! I feel safer already.
bbgrunt
Jan 2015
#15
Actually, yes, we should. Just not ones based on tech 60 years out-of-date...
DRoseDARs
Jan 2015
#17
Says the guy who quoted a non-biologist from 1982 about the earliest life. nt
DRoseDARs
Jan 2015
#38
Be my guest, but it is not changing the subject and you DID imply pollution in China was a hoax.
Bonobo
Jan 2015
#45
If that's the topic and China is the subtopic then I'll add the fact that China is currently running
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2015
#62
I think the following is good advice for any and all important subjects in discussion:
Bluenorthwest
Jan 2015
#64