General Discussion

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)

10. You need ENEnews.com then

Reply to Warren DeMontague (Reply #8)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 03:36 AM

Jan 2015

You don't have to look at the comments, just read the reports that are linked in the headlines.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

71 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

How Quickly Did Fukushima Radiation Reach North America, and When Will it Peak? [View all] SidDithers Jan 2015 OP

But, but, but Sid! The Sea Starzzzzz! longship Jan 2015 #1

I read this 10 years ago when I hitched a ride with the time traveling radiation. zappaman Jan 2015 #2

But but ... the Starfish are melting FreakinDJ Jan 2015 #3

About the virus said to be found RobertEarl Jan 2015 #24

No thanks FreakinDJ Jan 2015 #46

2001? Control-Z Jan 2015 #4

....Yeah- I caught that, too. 2001- so not as quickly as we thought, huh? Warren DeMontague Jan 2015 #8

You need ENEnews.com then RobertEarl Jan 2015 #10

I've seen it. Warren DeMontague Jan 2015 #14

No, you must not have RobertEarl Jan 2015 #22

Well, AFAIC we're all on the same team. At least I am. Fukushima was and is a clusterfuck. Warren DeMontague Jan 2015 #42

+1 newfie11 Jan 2015 #59

Pretty much sums up my opinion on nuclear as well. NuclearDem Jan 2015 #69

Half a million not dead, 25,000 not mourned properly here. nt Bonobo Jan 2015 #5

What do you mean about Boreal Jan 2015 #13

No, 25,000. Bonobo Jan 2015 #16

I still have great empathy Boreal Jan 2015 #20

You're gonna love this sid RobertEarl Jan 2015 #6

"doomers who pretend to know something about science"...nt SidDithers Jan 2015 #7

Well RobertEarl Jan 2015 #9

Kinda like rejecting the report that Fukushima rice is no longer dangerous? nt Bonobo Jan 2015 #11

I didn't reject it RobertEarl Jan 2015 #12

The Japanese gove says up to 2,000 becquerels/kilo of vegetable is acceptable. Bonobo Jan 2015 #19

6.9? Seriously? FBaggins Jan 2015 #50

well, then, let's just build us some more "nucular plants"! I feel safer already. bbgrunt Jan 2015 #15

Actually, yes, we should. Just not ones based on tech 60 years out-of-date... DRoseDARs Jan 2015 #17

So why even pretend that it could possibly exist? delrem Jan 2015 #27

You don't follow modern nuclear developments, do you? DRoseDARs Jan 2015 #28

Thanks for the uplifting post! delrem Jan 2015 #29

What do we do with the waste? RobertEarl Jan 2015 #32

Ah, another one that thinks the US nuclear industry is all there is. nt DRoseDARs Jan 2015 #37

Wrong again RobertEarl Jan 2015 #39

Germany is not even close. The answer is France. Bonobo Jan 2015 #40

Oh, damn! And here I was... freshwest Jan 2015 #18

Post removed Post removed Jan 2015 #21

Some background on nuclear radiation from an expert RobertEarl Jan 2015 #23

Prokaryotes ~3.6 billions years ago DRoseDARs Jan 2015 #25

Typical pro-nuke response RobertEarl Jan 2015 #34

Says the guy who quoted a non-biologist from 1982 about the earliest life. nt DRoseDARs Jan 2015 #38

He was a nuclear expert RobertEarl Jan 2015 #41

+1 nt newfie11 Jan 2015 #60

No, that fact is not true. jeff47 Jan 2015 #66

That was a good lock and a good hide. zappaman Jan 2015 #70

That's an entire ocean, Mr. Dithers. delrem Jan 2015 #26

Radiation didn't do this~~ Bonobo Jan 2015 #30

No, but radiation isn't a youtube "viral" hoax, either. nt delrem Jan 2015 #31

You think the particulate contamination in China...is a...hoax? Bonobo Jan 2015 #33

That's what I say about the nuke industry RobertEarl Jan 2015 #35

Great quote! Sadly out of context. nt Bonobo Jan 2015 #36

No, I think you are changing the topic. delrem Jan 2015 #43

Be my guest, but it is not changing the subject and you DID imply pollution in China was a hoax. Bonobo Jan 2015 #45

Post removed Post removed Jan 2015 #47

31. No, but radiation isn't a youtube "viral" hoax, either. nt hobbit709 Jan 2015 #48

Again, pollution in China isn't "radiation" a la Fukushima. delrem Jan 2015 #52

If that's the topic and China is the subtopic then I'll add the fact that China is currently running Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #62

Whatever you do, don't mention France jeff47 Jan 2015 #67

What did this mean? "No, but radiation isn't a youtube "viral" hoax, either." Bonobo Jan 2015 #49

Post removed Post removed Jan 2015 #51

you might want to delete that "idiot" remark hobbit709 Jan 2015 #53

NO! delrem Jan 2015 #54

Don't say you weren't warned. hobbit709 Jan 2015 #55

Starfish was already looked into jeff47 Jan 2015 #68

Strange little encounter, Bonobo Jan 2015 #56

Once a fanatic's mind is made up, there is no swaying with facts or reality. hobbit709 Jan 2015 #57

Now Sid, you know the time traveling radiation alters the facts. hobbit709 Jan 2015 #44

ROFL: But the MILK! The California MILK!!!!! alcibiades_mystery Jan 2015 #58

+1 FSogol Jan 2015 #61

Heheh... SidDithers Jan 2015 #63

I think the following is good advice for any and all important subjects in discussion: Bluenorthwest Jan 2015 #64

Hell, I almost NEVER agree with him but he's right on this one. nt Bonobo Jan 2015 #65

Just returning to the U.S. from Japan. tblue Jan 2015 #71