General Discussion

John1956PA

(4,952 posts)

28. You may be thinking of Prince Harry (n/t)

Reply to shraby (Reply #22)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 04:21 PM

Jan 2015

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

87 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Was *that* pic of Prince Andrew photoshopped? [View all] CJCRANE Jan 2015 OP

A small room with a central light-source gets you this effect. DetlefK Jan 2015 #1

I hope that was a joke. Atman Jan 2015 #6

I meant the tiny elliptic sheen above the mirror-image of the flash. DetlefK Jan 2015 #8

Nope. Flash reflecting off of the plastic window shade. Atman Jan 2015 #11

I agree with the poster above. There is the flash and also an ellipse of light above it CJCRANE Jan 2015 #15

Exactly what I am saying... Atman Jan 2015 #16

Based solely on "a Martian landing on your granny's taint" ... 11 Bravo Jan 2015 #21

I WANT TO BELIEVE Warren DeMontague Jan 2015 #54

Damn you !!! KentuckyWoman Jan 2015 #85

You don't know what you're talking about. It's clearly a UFO Orrex Jan 2015 #86

This message was self-deleted by its author JTFrog Jan 2015 #2

It's like people forgot what film photos looked like. Brickbat Jan 2015 #3

When the entire western media goes big on a story like this CJCRANE Jan 2015 #4

They have very strict libel laws in the UK to protect the rich. Jesus Malverde Jan 2015 #44

What do you think the outcome will be of all this? CJCRANE Jan 2015 #47

From the guardian Jesus Malverde Jan 2015 #48

Ridiculous. Atman Jan 2015 #5

They both have the same red-eye effect... Atman Jan 2015 #7

Fair enough. CJCRANE Jan 2015 #9

I'm no forensic expert, but... Atman Jan 2015 #10

The one thing that makes me question this photo TexasMommaWithAHat Jan 2015 #12

He might be stupid. Iggo Jan 2015 #13

He's probably no more stupid than... Oilwellian Jan 2015 #17

I don't think Harry was posing for the photos, though TexasMommaWithAHat Jan 2015 #19

You do make a good point n/t Oilwellian Jan 2015 #30

You were correct in that both were stupid :) TexasMommaWithAHat Jan 2015 #36

He used to be known as "Randy Andy" nt LiberalElite Jan 2015 #56

I'm old enough to remember that. LOL TexasMommaWithAHat Jan 2015 #60

This is a good point nichomachus Jan 2015 #78

Not photoshopped. He's a vampire, ergo no shadow. lumberjack_jeff Jan 2015 #14

Right. There is a flash, but no shadow. You would expect a shadow nichomachus Jan 2015 #77

A couple of things make me think P-shop marions ghost Jan 2015 #18

Re: #3 Arugula Latte Jan 2015 #23

I see that marions ghost Jan 2015 #34

What bothers me her arm angle is different in the foreground than in the reflection csziggy Jan 2015 #29

good points marions ghost Jan 2015 #31

Both appear to have eye contact with the camera TexasMommaWithAHat Jan 2015 #38

I think you're right marions ghost Jan 2015 #40

My prediction is that he'll be exonerated CJCRANE Jan 2015 #20

There are flight logs where epstien was allowed to fly into UK military bases to visit the price. Jesus Malverde Jan 2015 #45

Most of the One Percent gets special access to the UK nichomachus Jan 2015 #79

Here's some background to Epstein and what went on... KoKo Jan 2015 #67

Andrew will never be "exonerated," for there will not be a trial of him. He will, instead, be WinkyDink Jan 2015 #71

That's supposed to be Prince Andrew??? The hair is too dark and too straight. shraby Jan 2015 #22

You may be thinking of Prince Harry (n/t) John1956PA Jan 2015 #28

lulz Jesus Malverde Jan 2015 #46

Whoops! You can see how much I pay attention to the Monarchy. Royal families shraby Jan 2015 #49

Totally agree! Jesus Malverde Jan 2015 #61

I was going say "it's good pshop if it is pshop"... but it's not that good Schema Thing Jan 2015 #24

That's what I see marions ghost Jan 2015 #32

The story just seems so outlandish AngryAmish Jan 2015 #25

Some were kids allegedly. IIRC there were at least 40 victims allegedly. CJCRANE Jan 2015 #42

He pled guilty to soliciting sex from a 14-yr-old. What more do you want? The details have been out WinkyDink Jan 2015 #53

OK, I am wrong. AngryAmish Jan 2015 #57

No. Agschmid Jan 2015 #26

The light source is on the right of the photo CJCRANE Jan 2015 #27

Yep marions ghost Jan 2015 #33

is that his daughter ? JI7 Jan 2015 #35

No a 17 year old sex slave of Jeffrey Epstien a registered sex offender/billionaire..nt Jesus Malverde Jan 2015 #41

You don't know what Eugenie and Beatrice look like? Or what this story comprises? WinkyDink Jan 2015 #52

There's a night sky, but you can't see any stars. NASA clearly faked this on a sound stage. Bucky Jan 2015 #37

Nice one! But don't forget, for example, Ashley Todd was busted by bloggers first CJCRANE Jan 2015 #39

Oh dear, keep calm and carry on. Jesus Malverde Jan 2015 #43

wondering how many american politicians will end up exposed formernaderite Jan 2015 #66

No. here's the full photo alp227 Jan 2015 #50

Complete with Procurer Sans Peer, Ghislaine Maxwell. WinkyDink Jan 2015 #55

she supposedly kept the "sex toy cabinet" and he liked to have her play role of KoKo Jan 2015 #82

Here is my humble opinion of why this story is BS.... and it's not what you think... underahedgerow Jan 2015 #59

Your post shows a lack of understanding about prostitution, sex work and sex trafficking. Brickbat Jan 2015 #63

I hear what you're saying, but I wasn't addressing these problems overall, which are globally underahedgerow Jan 2015 #76

She started working for Epstein when was 15. That's where the coercion comes in. CJCRANE Jan 2015 #65

"I mean seriously, it's just sex." For me to comment on this incredible statement would get me WinkyDink Jan 2015 #70

Massage Therapists vs sex workers and that "fine line" crap uppityperson Jan 2015 #73

Hi there... I intended no offense to the professional massage therapists, underahedgerow Jan 2015 #74

IN NO WAY. Good grief. Not even ANDREW, who is denying everything else, is denying this photo. WinkyDink Jan 2015 #51

Remember, Dan Rather's Memogate? Was that about the accusations CJCRANE Jan 2015 #58

That is not comparable in the slightest. (Yes, I remember, not having had a lobotomy). A secretary WinkyDink Jan 2015 #68

And those fake documents shut down the discussion about Shrub going AWOL. CJCRANE Jan 2015 #72

Well, if there's no evidence other than that photo, MineralMan Jan 2015 #62

They first met in London allegedly, where the required age is 16. CJCRANE Jan 2015 #64

Are you KIDDING here? WTH is a Prince of the REALM doing with his arm clutched tightly around a WinkyDink Jan 2015 #69

Clutched tightly? You can see space between the two of them. n/t nichomachus Jan 2015 #80

Sex slavery is rampant in the inner circles of the rich and powerful. chrisa Jan 2015 #75

Assume the photo is real -- what does it prove nichomachus Jan 2015 #81

It looks weird, the girl's pants/legs and no red eyes for Ghislaine Maxwell jakeXT Jan 2015 #83

Plus there is smudging near her thumb CJCRANE Jan 2015 #84

His red eyes obviously confirm that he's a demon. Orrex Jan 2015 #87