Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)

9. Having read the suit, I think this is a meritorius case. I think McCullogh can reasonably

Reply to pintobean (Reply #6)

Mon Jan 5, 2015, 05:40 PM

Jan 2015

restrict some evidence...such as the identities of other GJs. But I don't think he can reasonably restrict this juror from rendering their opinion on the proceedings.

I don't know that I would have filed the lawsuit, though.....I might just have given an anonymous interview with a foreign network. McCullough wouldn't have been able to touch either the reporter or network.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

19 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Michael Brown grand juror sues St. Louis County prosecutor, asking to speak out on case [View all] pintobean Jan 2015 OP

Interesting... Spazito Jan 2015 #1

Will read suit later and comment. nt msanthrope Jan 2015 #2

Cool, thanks pintobean Jan 2015 #6

Having read the suit, I think this is a meritorius case. I think McCullogh can reasonably msanthrope Jan 2015 #9

Thanks. My concern is with the other GJs. pintobean Jan 2015 #10

McCulloch is going to fight this tooth and nail. And if the other prosecutors are smart, they msanthrope Jan 2015 #11

Do those allegations have to be made publicly? pintobean Jan 2015 #12

No---they don't. But let me tell you what I think is going on here. msanthrope Jan 2015 #13

Okay. Thanks for taking the time pintobean Jan 2015 #14

I wonder if they filed because just making the allegations public is a good thing? bettyellen Jan 2015 #15

Definitely....making the allegations public is not only a good thing, it's a siren call to the media msanthrope Jan 2015 #16

I felt that way about some witnesses in this case- that they might worry they would never be heard bettyellen Jan 2015 #17

Odds are... Lee-Lee Jan 2015 #3

I doubt it is about a book NJCher Jan 2015 #4

If the system isn't working or is corrupted, I Skidmore Jan 2015 #7

It does not matter her motivation AngryAmish Jan 2015 #19

There's definitely more to see here TexasMommaWithAHat Jan 2015 #5

Interesting. K&R. n/t Jefferson23 Jan 2015 #8

k&r... spanone Jan 2015 #18